Former Centre County District Attorney Stacy Parks Miller.
I now have two small-town (county) legal systems to compare. However, I am more familiar with the Centre County (PA) legal system than the Monroe County (MI) legal system. My experiences with the Monroe County system have been much better than my experiences with the Centre County system.
While things seem to be turning around over the last couple of years, the Centre County legal system was a mess for the ten years before that. There is even a Facebook group called Crisis in our Courthouse about the mess. I did not create it and don’t know who did. It has documented much of the turmoil in great detail and contains more information about the stuff I will discuss briefly here.
Scanned copy of a civil action complaint filed in Centre County Court.
The image displays a typed legal document titled 'ROGERS CASTOR' at the top left, listing attorneys for the plaintiff. The case is identified as 'STACY PARKS MILLER v. CENTRE COUNTY' and other defendants, with 'COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CENTRE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA' on the right side. A blue ink stamp reading 'FILED FOR RECORD 2015 AUG 28 PM 1:25 DEBRA C JANEL PROTHONOARY CENTRE COUNTY, PA' appears in the lower right corner.
Notice to defend a civil lawsuit filed in Centre County, Pennsylvania.
The image shows a formal legal notice from the Court of Common Pleas, Centre County, PA. It lists Stacy Parks Miller as plaintiff and multiple individuals and entities as defendants. A handwritten number '3434' appears next to case number '2015-'. The document includes instructions for responding within twenty days.
A flyer providing information on hiring a lawyer and available legal aid services.
The image shows a single-page printed document titled 'LAWYER REFERRAL AND INFORMATION SERVICE' from the Centre County Court Administration located at 102 South Allegheny Street, Bellefonte, PA 16823. The text explains that the office can provide information about hiring a lawyer and may offer referrals to agencies providing legal services at reduced fees or no fee for eligible persons.
Scanned page of a civil complaint detailing allegations against Centre County District Attorney Stacy Parks Miller.
The image shows a two-page legal document labeled 'COMPLAINT', featuring text under headings 'Preliminary Statement' and 'Background'. A blue ink stamp reading 'FILED FOR RECORD' is visible on the right side, along with partial text indicating filing date and time. The document references Plaintiff Stacy Parks Miller and includes footnotes defining defendant classes.
Document excerpt detailing District Attorney Parks Miller’s activities and conflicts with Centre County Commissioners.
This is a single-page scan of a formal document, likely part of a civil complaint or legal filing. It contains five numbered paragraphs (5–7) describing the District Attorney’s re-election, professional rivals, and specific actions taken against county officials regarding prison investigations and sentencing policies.
Page four of a civil complaint outlining allegations against Parks Miller and related individuals.
The image shows a printed document page with numbered paragraphs discussing legal actions taken by District Attorney Parks Miller in 2012. It mentions investigations into drug trafficking, search warrants served on the Masorti Law Group, and employment history of Defendant Shutt.
Page 5 of a civil complaint alleging defamation and murder-for-hire by attorneys Glantz and Cantorna.
The image shows a printed document, likely a court filing or legal complaint, with numbered paragraphs recounting events involving District Attorney Parks Miller. It includes allegations about child abuse cases, expert testimony failures, retaliatory attacks, and credible information received in early summer 2013 regarding solicitation to kill Assistant District Attorney Nathan Boob.
Page excerpt from a civil complaint detailing events involving ADA Nathan Boob and Ryan Richard.
The image shows a single page of text from a legal document, with paragraph numbers 22 through 30 visible. The text discusses Assistant District Attorney Nathan Boob’s employment at the Centre County District Attorney’s Office and describes actions taken against Ryan Richard, including new charges brought by ADA Boob.
Page 7 of a civil complaint detailing law enforcement actions involving Ryan Richard and ADA Boob.
The image shows a single page of text from a legal document, specifically paragraphs 31 through 39. The content discusses District Attorney Parks Miller's conclusions about potential danger to ADA Boob, Albro's prior work with Trooper James Ellis, and the setup of a sting operation involving an undercover trooper posing as 'Home Cookin'.
Page 8 of a civil complaint detailing a covert investigation into a murder-for-hire scheme.
The image shows a single page from a legal document, likely a civil complaint, containing numbered paragraphs from 40 to 48. The text describes a plan involving law enforcement, bail procedures, and secret recordings to gather evidence against Ryan Richard for a murder-for-hire plot. It mentions individuals named Albro and Parks Miller in the context of judicial actions.
Scanned text from a legal document detailing investigative procedures and court approvals.
The image shows a single page of a typed legal document containing numbered paragraphs (49–58) describing law enforcement actions, including transferring an individual to jail under a false name and obtaining wiretap approval from Judge Pamela Ruest. The text references District Attorney Parks Miller, Albro’s lawyer Matthew McClenahan, and Pennsylvania State Police involvement.
Scanned text from a civil complaint detailing legal procedures involving judges, attorneys, and bail orders.
The image shows a single page of a typed legal document with paragraph numbers 59 to 66. The text describes interactions between defendants, prosecutors, and a judge regarding wiretaps and pretend bail orders. A page number '10' is visible at the bottom center.
Page from a civil complaint detailing events surrounding a wiretap and legal operations in Centre County.
The image shows a printed legal document, likely a civil complaint or court filing, with numbered paragraphs discussing a wiretap at Centre County Prison and a sting operation involving Defendant Shutt. The text references Attorney Sean McGraw and Defendant Ruest in connection with a pretend order and false affidavit.
Page 12 of a legal document detailing allegations against Defendants regarding forged court orders and misuse of public resources.
The image shows a single page from a legal filing containing numbered paragraphs (75–80) that describe events involving multiple defendants, an undercover investigation, and false accusations filed by one defendant against another. The text references District Attorney Parks Miller, Judge Ruest, and the Office of Attorney General in connection with alleged forgery and improper allocation of county resources.
Page 13 of a civil complaint detailing legal actions against county and lawyer defendants.
The image shows a single page from a legal document with numbered paragraphs (81–87) describing alleged misconduct by various defendants. The text references District Attorney Parks Miller, Bellefonte Borough, forgery laws in Pennsylvania, and claims of false allegations made by Richard Shutt.
Scanned text from a civil complaint regarding police investigation procedures and grand jury reports.
The image shows a single page of a typed legal document with paragraph numbers 88 through 95. The text discusses Pennsylvania law on law enforcement ruses, the Bellefonte Police decision to refer a case to the State Police, and subsequent findings by a grand jury regarding Centre County Commissioners' authority.
Page 15 of a legal complaint detailing events surrounding a January 2015 Centre County Commissioners meeting.
The image shows page 15 of a typed legal document containing numbered paragraphs from 96 to 102. The text discusses actions taken by the Centre County Commissioners, appearances by Bernard Cantorna and Defendant Andrew Shubin at a January 20, 2015 meeting, false statements made about an investigation, and a subsequent search warrant executed on January 24, 2015.
Page 16 of a civil complaint detailing grand jury findings on signature evidence.
This is a single-page scan of a legal document, likely a civil complaint or indictment. The text includes numbered paragraphs (103–109) discussing court findings regarding signatures on bail orders and investigations into a murder-for-hire plot. It references defendants, plaintiffs, handwriting experts, and law enforcement officials.
Page 17 of a civil complaint detailing allegations regarding search warrants and media exposure.
The image shows a single page from a legal document with paragraph numbers 109 through 116 visible. The text discusses the Plaintiff's claims about defendants acting recklessly in obtaining search warrants, media broadcasting images of belongings being carried out of an office, and seizure of sensitive law enforcement information.
Page 18 of a civil complaint detailing allegations against county officials regarding false statements and a search warrant.
The image shows a single page from a legal document with paragraph numbers 117 through 122. The text discusses defendants Exarchos, Dershem, and Pipe, mentions a grand jury exoneration on July 31, 2015, and references an unsealed search warrant that negatively impacted an investigation into Nathan Boob.
Page 19 of a civil complaint detailing alleged retaliatory actions by defendants.
The image shows a single page from a legal document with paragraph numbers 123 through 128. The text discusses criminal investigations involving murder-for-hire plots and mentions specific individuals like Ryan Richard, ADA Boob, and Parks Miller. A section heading reads 'IV. The Attacks Continue'.
Page excerpt detailing allegations regarding the dissemination of fabricated judicial records.
This is a single-page scan of a legal complaint or court filing. The text includes numbered paragraphs (129-134) discussing defendants directing requests for 'Judicial Records' and creating color-coded spreadsheets to highlight contacts between court members and District Attorney staff.
Page 21 of a civil complaint detailing allegations against Defendants regarding illegal record access and attempts to remove the District Attorney.
The image displays a single page from a legal document, identified by the filename context as part of a civil complaint involving Parks Miller. The text is organized into numbered paragraphs (135–142) discussing attorney conduct, personal information exposure, and efforts to exclude the District Attorney from her role.
Scanned text from a legal document detailing court proceedings and appeals.
The image shows a single page of a typed legal document with paragraph numbers 143 through 150. The text discusses rulings by Judge Stewart Kurtz, preliminary injunctions issued to the County, violations of those orders, and subsequent appeals to the Commonwealth Court and Pennsylvania Office of Open Records.
Page excerpt from a civil complaint detailing legal actions and grand jury investigation details.
The image displays a single page of text from a legal document, likely a civil complaint, with paragraph numbers 151 through 158. It discusses judge rulings, county defendants' behavior, and the initiation of a grand jury investigation by the Office of Attorney General. The bottom center shows the page number '23'.
Page excerpt from a civil complaint regarding alleged misconduct by Defendant Ruest.
The image displays a single page of text from a legal document, likely a civil complaint, with paragraph numbers 159 through 165. The text discusses statements made by Defendant Ruest, investigations involving wiretaps in Centre County Prison, handwriting expert testimony on signatures, and allegations of illegal prosecution.
Page 25 of a civil complaint detailing jury findings on various legal issues.
The image shows a single page from a legal document, likely a civil complaint, containing numbered paragraphs (166–173) that summarize jury findings regarding bail orders, theft of services allegations, and the printing of an election guide. The text references multiple defendants including Ruest, Parks Miller, Shutt, and Andrew Shubin, and discusses issues such as falsified affidavits and defamation.
Page 26 of a civil complaint detailing biographical information of the plaintiff and defendants.
The image shows a printed legal document page with text paragraphs numbered 174 through 182 under the heading 'VI. Biographical Information.' It lists personal details including names, addresses, and professional roles for Stacy Parks Miller, Michelle Shutt, Philip Masorti, Bernard Cantorna, Andrew Shubin, and Sean McGraw.
Page 27 of a civil complaint listing multiple defendants from Centre County, PA.
The image shows a printed legal document page numbered 27, containing paragraphs 183 through 189 that identify adult individuals as defendants in a lawsuit. The text includes their addresses in Bellefonte and State College, Pennsylvania, along with their professional roles such as judge, commissioner, administrator, and solicitor.
Page from a civil complaint detailing defamation claims against Centre County.
This is a single-page scan of a legal document, specifically a civil complaint. It includes an address for the Defendant (Centre County) and numbered paragraphs (190–198) outlining allegations of false and defamatory statements regarding criminal and professional misconduct. The text references harm to the plaintiff’s reputation in various communities.
Page from a civil complaint detailing defamation claims and requesting monetary damages.
The image shows a printed legal document page with numbered paragraphs discussing defamation allegations against Defendants. It includes a request for compensatory and punitive damages totaling over $50,000 and introduces 'COUNT II – INJURIUS FALSEHOOD' (likely intended as 'INJURIOUS FALSEHOOD'). The text references ongoing criminal investigations involving law enforcement and attempted murder.
Page 30 of a civil complaint alleging malicious prosecution.
The image displays a printed legal document, specifically Count III of a civil complaint titled 'Plaintiff v. Defendants Exarchos, Dersham, Pipe, Glantz, & Ruest'. The text details allegations of malicious prosecution and includes numbered paragraphs from 207 to 213.
Page 31 of a civil complaint detailing claims for compensatory and punitive damages.
The image shows a printed legal document titled 'COUNT IV – INTENTIONAL AND/OR NEGLIGENT INFLECTION OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS'. It includes paragraphs 214–219 discussing the importance of the District Attorney office, public trust, and emotional distress suffered by the Plaintiff. The text references Pennsylvania law and Centre County.
Page 32 of a civil complaint detailing allegations of conspiracy and requesting damages.
The image displays a printed legal document with numbered paragraphs discussing emotional distress, harm, and a conspiracy to illegally prosecute the plaintiff. It includes a demand for compensatory and punitive damages under Count V - Conspiracy.
Page 33 of a civil complaint alleging common law abuse of process.
The image displays a printed legal document, specifically Count VI of a civil complaint titled 'Plaintiff v. Defendants Exarchos, Dershem, Pipe, Glantz, Cantorna, Shubin, Boyde & McGraw'. It includes numbered paragraphs (229–234) describing procedural misconduct and concludes with a demand for compensatory damages exceeding $50,000.
Page 34 of a civil complaint detailing negligence and federal claim counts against multiple defendants.
The image displays a printed legal document page with numbered paragraphs under two counts: Count VII (Negligence) and Count VIII (Claim Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983). The text includes allegations of failure to investigate, damages sought, and incorporation of prior paragraphs.
Page 35 of a civil complaint detailing claims against Centre County officials for constitutional violations.
The image displays a printed legal document, specifically pages from a civil complaint. It includes numbered paragraphs (242-243) arguing government liability and denial of due process, followed by 'WHEREFORE' demands for damages. A section titled 'COUNT IX – CLAIM PURSUANT TO 42 U.S.C. 1983' lists specific allegations regarding Fourth Amendment violations related to searches and seizures.
Legal document excerpt with wherefore clause and attorney signature block.
The image shows the bottom portion of a civil complaint or legal pleading. It includes numbered point 5 regarding damage to Plaintiff's rights, a 'WHEREFORE' section demanding over $50,000 in damages plus costs and fees, followed by a signature line for Rogers Castor with typed names Bruce L. Castor Jr. and Lance Rogers, along with their firm address and contact details.
Verification statement signed by Stacy Parks Miller on page 37 of a legal document.
This is a single-page scan of a legal verification form. The text states that Stacy Parks-Miller, as Plaintiff, verifies the facts are true to the best of her knowledge and belief, subject to penalties under 18 Pa. C.S. §4904. A handwritten signature appears above the typed name 'Stacy Parks Miller'.
Title page for Exhibit A.
The image displays the text 'Exhibit “A”' in bold, black font centered on a plain white background. No other visual elements or content are present.
Scanned page of a grand jury report investigating allegations against Stacy Parks Miller.
The image shows a formal legal document header and introduction from the Thirty-Seventh Statewide Investigating Grand Jury. It details an investigation into possible law violations by Stacy Parks Miller, including forged signatures and misuse of office resources.
Page 2 of a legal document citing relevant Pennsylvania criminal statutes and legislation.
The image shows a printed page from a legal document, likely part of a civil complaint or brief. It lists three criminal statutes (18 Pa.C.S.A. 4101 Forgery, 4104 Tampering with records or identification, and 3926 Theft of Services) and one relevant legislation section (16 P.S. § 1405 Misconduct of District Attorney). The text is formatted in standard legal citation style with underlined headings.
Excerpts from Pennsylvania laws concerning district attorney responsibilities and Attorney General prosecution powers.
The image displays a printed legal document containing text from Pennsylvania statutes, including sections on district attorneys charged with crimes and the Attorney General's role in criminal prosecutions. The page includes numbered subsections detailing conditions under which the Attorney General may intervene in cases involving state officials or corrupt organizations.
Page four of a legal document detailing criminal culpability findings involving Stacy Parks Miller.
The image shows a printed legal document with text discussing district attorney procedures, Commonwealth intervention, and specific allegations against Stacy Parks Miller. The visible section includes numbered items (5) through (8), followed by a heading 'FACTUAL FINDINGS CRIMINAL CULPABILITY' and introductory paragraphs about her election and office.
Page 5 of a civil complaint describing an undercover surveillance operation.
The image shows a single page (numbered 5) of a typed legal document discussing a criminal investigation. The text details how DA Parks Miller arranged for an undercover trooper to pose as a spiritual advisor named 'Home Cookin' to record conversations with inmate Ryan Richard regarding a murder-for-hire plot against Nathan Boob.
Document excerpt detailing allegations of forged bail orders in a Pennsylvania case.
The image shows a single page (numbered 6) from a legal text, likely part of a civil complaint or court filing. It describes a plan to create a fake bail order for Albro, involving DA Parks Miller, Michelle Shutt, and Philip Masorti. The text references testimony about forged signatures and interactions with Judge Ruest.
Page of a civil complaint detailing witness testimonies on signature authenticity and legal procedures.
The image shows a single page from a typed legal document with numbered paragraphs describing witness statements. The text discusses testimony regarding fake bail orders, consensual recordings, and forensic handwriting analysis by Mr. Detwiler comparing signatures of Pamela A. Ruest.
Page 8 of a civil complaint detailing forensic analysis of signatures and employment-related claims.
The image shows a single page (numbered 8) from a legal document containing text about signature authentication, peer review by Gus Lesnevich, and testimony regarding campaign work for DA Parks Miller. The visible text includes calculations of costs related to copying documents and notary services.
Scanned text page detailing legal proceedings under the Commonwealth Attorneys Act involving Stacy Parks Miller.
The image shows a single page of a typed legal document with visible text referencing the Commonwealth Attorneys Act, Stacy Parks Miller, and the Bellefonte Police. The page includes numbered sections discussing statutory requirements for complaints and attorney appointments.
Page 10 of a legal document outlining case findings and recommendations for statutory clarification.
The image shows a printed page, numbered 10 at the bottom, containing text about legal case findings and recommendations. It discusses confusion between statutes and notes that evidence does not support charging Stacy Parks Miller with forgery or tampering. The document recommends legislative clarification regarding the interplay of existing statutes.
A formal legal response from Centre County District Attorney Stacy Parks Miller regarding allegations in a grand jury report.
The image shows a single-page scanned document, likely from a WordPress Media Library, containing text about legal proceedings involving the Thirty-Seventh Statewide Investigating Grand Jury and Centre County. The document includes references to campaign activities, election guides, and notary services performed by District Attorney Stacy Parks Miller.
A letter from District Attorney Stacy Parks Miller addressing concerns about her public appearances and testimony credibility.
The image shows a scanned page of a formal legal letter addressed to a Grand Jury. The text discusses Ms. Shutt's claims regarding DA Parks Miller's calendar and campaign activities, as well as testimony about a bail reduction order. It is signed by Stacy Parks Miller, District Attorney of Centre County, Pennsylvania.
Legal correspondence from Caputo & Mariotti addressing objections to a statewide investigating grand jury report.
This is a scanned letterhead document from the law firm Caputo & Mariotti, P.C., dated July 23, 2015. It contains typed text outlining objections to a proposed report concerning Robert Ruggiero and Chief Shawn Weaver, referencing Commonwealth Attorney Fact and police department assignments.
Legal correspondence from Abom & Kutulakis LLP concerning a Grand Jury investigation.
This is a scanned document of a formal letter on the letterhead of Abom & Kutulakis, Attorneys at Law. The letter, dated July 21, 2015, is addressed to Simquita Bridges, Senior Deputy Attorney General, in Pittsburgh, PA. It concerns a Grand Jury Investigation and references Centre County Commissioners Steven Dersham and Chris Exarchos.
Title page for Exhibit B.
The image shows a single white document page with the centered, bold text 'Exhibit “B”'. There are no other visible elements, graphics, or content on the page. The filename suggests this may be part of a civil complaint document set.
A formal letter from Rogers Castor addressing Centre County Commissioners about a special prosecutor appointment.
This is a scanned document of a formal letter dated January 27, 2015, from Bruce L. Castor Jr. on Rogers Castor letterhead. The letter is addressed to Hon. Chris Exarchos, Hon. Steve Dershem, and Hon. Michael Pipe at Centre County Court House in Bellefonte, PA. It discusses District Attorney Stacy Parks Miller and references Pennsylvania statutes 16 P.S. §1406 and 71 P.S. §732-101 et seq.
A formal legal letter signed by Bruce L. Castor, Jr., regarding jurisdiction over a bail inquiry.
The image shows a single-page scanned document containing legal text referencing Pennsylvania court rulings and statutes. It includes a typed signature block with 'Bruce L. Castor, Jr.' and a list of recipients in the cc section.
Title page for Exhibit C.
The image shows a single white document page with the centered text 'Exhibit “C”' printed in bold black serif font. No other content, graphics, or people are visible on the page.
A formal letter regarding legal counsel and defamation issues addressed to a solicitor.
The image shows a scanned letterhead document from Rogers Castor dated August 4, 2015, addressed to Louis T. Glantz, Solicitor of Centre County, PA. The text discusses potential criminal investigation, defamation claims, and requests for legal counsel among county officials.
Typed letter signed by Bruce L. Castor, Jr., addressing concerns over defamatory remarks and reputational damage.
The image shows the bottom portion of a typed letter on white paper, ending with the closing 'Very truly yours,' followed by a handwritten signature and the typed name 'Bruce L. Castor, Jr.' The visible text requests that members of the Centre County Administration avoid making derogatory remarks about DA Parks Miller to mitigate damage to county taxpayers.
Legal motion filed by District Attorney Stacy Parks Miller against the County of Centre.
This is a one-page scanned court document from the Court of Common Pleas in Centre County, Pennsylvania. It outlines a motion for contempt and sanctions filed by DA Stacy Parks Miller regarding alleged violations of Right to Know Law orders by the County of Centre between November 2014 and May 2015.
Page 2 of a legal document detailing the handling of unlawfully released records by attorneys and the judiciary.
The image shows a printed page (numbered 2) from a legal text discussing unlawful record releases to Attorney Bernard Cantorna, motions filed by attorneys, and efforts by defense lawyers. The footer indicates it was printed from Centre County Online Access on 6/10/2015.
Page 3 of a legal opinion regarding Centre County's response to right-to-know law requests.
The image shows a printed legal document, likely from a court case involving the Centre County. It includes text referencing cases Grine v. County of Centre and Gillette-Walker v. County of Centre, discussing injunctions against making responses to public records requests. The page contains footnotes citing specific case numbers and mentions the Prothonotary and District Court Administrator.
Page 4 of a legal document detailing court rulings regarding records and policy violations.
The image shows a printed legal document page with numbered paragraphs from 6 to 11. The text discusses court decisions concerning the Commonwealth, County policies, RTKL requests, and judicial records. A footer indicates it was printed from Centre County Online Access on 6/10/2015.
Page 5 of a legal document detailing a May 13, 2015 court order concerning the County of Centre.
The image shows a printed legal document page containing paragraphs numbered 12 through 16. It includes text about a hearing on May 13, 2015, and an excerpt from a court order enjoining the County of Centre from making responses to requests under the Pennsylvania Right-to-Know law.
A legal document excerpt detailing violations of court orders by the County regarding record access and response protocols.
The image shows a printed legal document page containing text about procedural violations by the County. It references specific dates (May 8, 2015; May 13, 2015), individuals (Dave Crowley, Judge Kurtz), and exhibits (Exhibit 4, Exhibit 5). The footer indicates it was printed from Centre County Online Access on 6/10/2015.
Page 7 of a legal filing regarding court orders and open records requests.
This is a scanned page from a legal document, likely part of a brief or motion. It contains numbered paragraphs discussing the County's actions, the Office of Open Records (OOR), and RTKL (Right to Know Law) requests. The text references the Jerry Sandusky trial and argues that judicial records are not subject to OOR jurisdiction.
Page 8 of a legal document detailing allegations of indirect criminal contempt against the County.
This is a scanned page from a legal filing, showing paragraphs 21 through 24. The text discusses elements required to establish indirect criminal contempt and alleges that the County has violated court orders regarding RTKL requests by refusing to direct them to the District Attorney. A citation to Commonwealth v. Brumbaugh appears in paragraph 21.
Page 9 of a legal document detailing claims about judicial records and county policy.
This is a scanned page from a legal filing containing numbered paragraphs (25–30) that assert facts regarding telephone records as judicial records, the District Attorney’s role in the Unified Judicial System, and court-ordered procedures for handling requests under RTKL. The text references former President Judge Brown and mentions dual appeals in OOR and Commonwealth Court.
Page 10 of a legal document detailing allegations against the County regarding judicial record handling.
The image shows a printed page from a legal filing or opinion, with numbered paragraphs (31–34) and subsections (a, b). It references a May 7, 2014 ruling, press tour statements by the Commissioner’s office, and includes URLs to State College news articles. The footer indicates it was printed on 6/10/2015 via Centre County Online Access.
Page 11 of a legal document detailing discussions on county cell phone usage and policy changes.
This is a scanned page (numbered 11) from a legal document or court transcript. The text discusses various points labeled c through h, mentioning commissioners Chris Exarchos and Steve Dershem, the Right to Know Law, and issues regarding county cell phones and privacy policies.
Page 12 of a legal document regarding Centre County's refusal to accept a court ruling.
This is a printed page from a legal filing, likely part of an opinion or brief. It contains numbered paragraphs (i, 35, 36) discussing the County's refusal to accept a court ruling that records are 'judicial'. The text mentions the Commonwealth and District Attorney requesting the Court find Centre County in Indirect Criminal Contempt.
Page 13 of a legal document signed by Bruce L. Castor Jr., counsel to District Attorney Stacy Parks Miller.
This is a scanned page from a legal document, ending with the phrase 'upon proof beyond a reasonable doubt, such other criminal sanctions as the Court might believe appropriate.' Below that is a typed closing 'Respectfully Submitted,' followed by a handwritten signature and printed name Bruce L. Castor Jr., Counsel to District Attorney Stacy Parks Miller. The page number 13 appears at the bottom center, and a footer indicates it was printed from Centre County Online Access on 6/10/2015.
Certificate of Service confirming U.S. Mail delivery to two attorneys on June 9, 2015.
This is a scanned page from a legal document titled 'CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE', certifying that service was made by U.S. Mail to Mary Lou Maierhofer and Craig J. Staudenmaier, Esquire, representing Centre County. The document includes typed addresses, a handwritten signature of Bruce L. Castor, Jr., and the date June 9, 2015.
Exhibit 1 document page.
This is a scanned or printed document page titled 'EXHIBIT 1' in bold, centered, uppercase serif typeface. At the bottom left, small text indicates it was printed from Centre County Online Access on 6/10/2015 at 4:12:08 PM.
Judge urges DA and County to settle dispute out of court.
This is a scanned article from State College, PA dated May 13, 2015, reporting on Judge Stewart Kurtz’s suggestion that Centre County officials resolve their legal dispute through mediation rather than litigation. The document includes an exhibit label and a grayscale photograph of two individuals, but no oversized bank check or ceremonial financial instrument is visible.
News report on legal conflicts involving judges, prosecutors, and defense attorneys regarding record releases.
This is a scanned page (Page 2 of 3) from a State College newspaper article dated 6/8/2015. The text discusses a lawsuit where Judge Parks Miller has dismissed some law firms but threatens to drag others back in due to their use of her phone records. It also mentions other judges suing the county over similar issues.
Printed article page from StateCollege.com featuring local news headlines and copyright notice.
This is a scanned printout of the third page (of three) from StateCollege.com, dated June 8, 2015. It displays three underlined headlines: one about a judge urging DA and county to settle a dispute out of court; another titled 'Penn State Football: Smith An Outsider No More On Franklin's Staff'; and a third about business owners recognized as best in Western Pennsylvania. A disclaimer and URL are visible below the headlines.
Exhibit 2 document page.
The image shows a single-page document titled 'EXHIBIT 2' in bold, centered, uppercase serif typeface. At the bottom left, small text indicates it was printed from Centre County Online Access on 6/10/2015 at 4:12:08 PM.
Legal article discussing Centre County’s appeal of judicial records request injunctions.
This is a screenshot or printout of a legal news article titled 'Centre County to Appeal Injunctions on Records Requests' from The Legal Intelligencer, dated May 26, 2015. It reports that three preliminary injunctions have been issued in Centre County preventing the government from responding to judicial records requests involving judges and district attorneys.
Page from a legal article about Centre County appeal injunctions on records requests.
The image shows a scanned page of text titled 'Centre County to Appeal Injunctions on Records Requests | The Legal Intelligencer', dated 6/8/2015. It contains multiple paragraphs discussing court orders, legal arguments regarding public records and privacy, and statements from attorneys representing various parties.
Legal article excerpt on record requests and judicial conduct investigations.
This is a scanned page from The Legal Intelligencer dated 6/8/2015, titled 'Centre County to Appeal Injunctions on Records Requests'. It discusses RTKL (Right-to-Know Law) requests involving Grine, Walker, Parks Miller, and Judge Bradley Lunsford. The text includes quotes from Louis Glantz, Castor, Colonna, Lizzy McLellan, and Max Mitchell regarding transparency, propriety of communication, and ongoing investigations by the Office of the Attorney General and Judicial Conduct Board.
Exhibit 3 document page.
The image shows a single-page document titled 'EXHIBIT 3' in bold, centered text. At the bottom left, there is a small print statement indicating it was printed from Centre County Online Access on 6/10/2015 at 4:12:08 PM.
Scanned legal correspondence excerpt marked as Exhibit 3.
The image displays a printed document containing a U-Mail Confidentiality Notice and a brief excerpt of a message dated November 4, 2014, from Craig Staudenmaier to Louis. The text indicates the content is attorney-client privileged and confidential. A black-and-white EXHIBIT stamp with the number '3' appears in the bottom right corner.
Scanned legal text analyzing public records requests under the RTKL and citing court precedents.
This is a scanned page from a legal document or email thread discussing Request for Trial by Jury (RTKJ) analysis. It outlines findings about whether certain records are subject to disclosure, referencing cases like Court of Common Pleas of Lackawanna County v. OOR and Frazier v. Philadelphia County Office of Prothonotary.
Legal analysis of Right-to-Know Law appeals regarding judicial agency records in Pennsylvania.
This is a scanned page from a legal opinion or memo dated around June 2015, authored by Craig J. Staudenmaier of Nausan Smith Shabster & Hall LLP in Harrisburg, PA. The text analyzes whether the Office of the Attorney General (OOR) has jurisdiction over Right-to-Know Law appeals from judicial agencies under Pennsylvania law.
Exhibit 4 document page.
This is a scanned or printed document page titled 'EXHIBIT 4', with no other visible content except for a small speck near the center. The bottom left corner contains a footer indicating it was printed from Centre County Online Access on 6/10/2015 at 4:12:08 PM.
Official letter denying a public records request from Judge Bradley P. Lunsford's office.
This is a formal letter dated May 18, 2015, from the Centre County Board of Commissioners in Pennsylvania. It responds to a written request for Verizon Wireless Invoice Summaries under the Pennsylvania Right-to-Know law and states that the request has been denied based on a prior court order.
Final agency response letter from Centre County Government.
This is Page 2 of a formal letter from the Centre County Government, ending with a signature block for Tim Boyde. It includes an enclosure note referencing Judge Kurtz May 13, 2015 Order and a CC to RTK File. The document was printed on 6/10/2015 via Centre County Online Access.
Exhibit 5 document page.
This is a scanned or printed document page titled 'EXHIBIT 5'. At the bottom left, there is a small text indicating it was printed from Centre County Online Access on 6/10/2015 at 4:12:08 PM. The rest of the page is blank except for this title and footer.
Official denial letter regarding a public records request.
This is a formal letter dated May 18, 2015, from the Centre County Board of Commissioners in Pennsylvania. It responds to a written request under the Pennsylvania Right-to-Know law for Verizon Wireless invoice summaries related to Judge Bradley P. Lunsford. The county states it has been enjoined from responding directly and directs the requester to contact Kendra Miknis at the Centre County District Court Administrator.
Final agency response letter from Centre County Government.
This is Page 2 of a formal letter from the Centre County Government, signed by Tim Boyde, Director of Administration and Open Records Officer. The document references an enclosure titled 'Judge Kurtz May 13, 2015 Order' and includes a cc note for 'RTK File'. A footer indicates it was printed from Centre County Online Access on June 10, 2015.
Official correspondence from the Pennsylvania Office of Open Records about a legal appeal process.
This is a printed letterhead document from the Pennsylvania Office of Open Records dated May 20, 2015. It addresses parties involved in an official notice of appeal (Docket # AP 2015-0812) and outlines procedures for submitting information under the Right-to-Know Law.
Legal guidance on public records appeals and third-party notifications.
The image shows a printed page from a legal or administrative document discussing burden of proof in record access cases. It includes sections on notifying third parties, law enforcement records, and informal mediation programs, signed by Nathanael J. Byerly, Acting Executive Director.
A completed appeal form for a denied right-to-know request submitted to the Pennsylvania Office of Open Records.
This is a scanned document showing a 'Right to Know Law Appeal' form from the Pennsylvania Office of Open Records, dated May 19, 2015. The form includes fields for requester name, agency details, and reasons for appeal, with checkboxes indicating receipt of supporting documents and agreement to mediation.
Scanned legal correspondence about a public records appeal.
The image shows a printed document from Centre County Online Access dated June 10, 2015. It contains an email header with redacted sender/recipient names and addresses, followed by text referencing a notice received on May 20, 2015 regarding an appeal filed under the Office of Open Records.
Printed correspondence regarding an appeal filed with the Office of Open Records.
The image shows a scanned page (page 2) of a formal letter or notice from the Centre County Public Defender to Dave R. Crowley, dated May 20, 2015. It includes contact details for direct dial, cell, and fax, along with email addresses linked via mailto: protocol. The body text references an attached appeal filed with the Office of Open Records and directs future correspondence to an Appeals Officer.
Official attestation letter concerning a Right-To-Know Law request and court injunctions.
This is a printed legal document titled 'Attestation of Timothy T. Boyde' issued by the Centre County Board of Commissioners in Pennsylvania. It details a response to a records request involving Judge Bradley P. Lunsford and District Attorney Stacy Parks-Miller, referencing court docket numbers and redacted information.
Notarized affidavit confirming signature on a document related to an appeal filed with the Office of Open Records.
This is a scanned legal document titled 'Commonwealth of Pennsylvania' containing a sworn statement signed by Timothy T. Boyde, dated May 28, 2015. The document includes a notarial acknowledgment signed and sealed by Kimberly C. Smeltzer, Notary Public, with her commission expiration date listed as July 12, 2018.
Email exchange about an open records appeal involving Centre County Public Defender.
The image shows a printed email from Timothy T. Boyde dated May 21, 2015, responding to a notice from the Office of Open Records (OOR) regarding an appeal for Centre County Public Defender v. Centre County. The document includes forwarding instructions and references to legal notification requirements under Pennsylvania law.
Blank page with header information from the Office of Open Records.
This is a scanned document page showing only the top section with contact details for Faith Henry, Administrative Officer at the Office of Open Records in Harrisburg, PA. The rest of the page is blank except for a footer indicating it was printed from Centre County Online Access on 6/10/2015.
Legal correspondence from Myers Brier & Kelly concerning a request for judicial communications under Pennsylvania law.
This is a scanned letter on official letterhead from Myers Brier & Kelly, dated May 27, 2015. It addresses the Pennsylvania Office of Open Records regarding an appeal docket number AP 2015-0812 involving Judge Bradley P. Lunsford and references to the Pennsylvania Right-to-Know Law.
Legal affidavit denying public record access based on judicial orders.
This is a scanned page of an official legal affidavit titled 'AFFIDAVIT' from Tim Boyde, Director of Administrative Services and Open Records Officer for the County of Centre. The document references Docket # AP 2015-0812 and cites Pennsylvania statutes regarding public records and judicial orders that bar release of certain documents.
Notarized acknowledgment form for Tim Boyde executed in Centre County, Pennsylvania.
This is a scanned legal document page from the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, specifically an acknowledgment and notarization form. It includes handwritten entries for the date (May 28, 2015), signatures of Tim Boyde and Notary Public Kimberly C. Smeltzer, and references to 18 Pa. C.S.A. Section 4904 regarding unsworn falsification penalties.
Final Determination document from the Pennsylvania Office of Open Records.
This is a scanned page from a Final Determination issued by the Pennsylvania Office of Open Records. The document concerns a dispute between Drew Johnson (on behalf of The Washington Times) and Bedford County regarding records requests under the Right-to-Know Law. It states that the appeal was granted and the county must take further action.
Page 2 of a legal document outlining requests for public records related to District Attorney Bill Higgins.
The image shows a two-page scanned document with the heading 'FACTUAL BACKGROUND' listing three categories of requested records: telephone records, internet browsing history, and email account screenshots. The text references dates in January and February 2015 and cites Pennsylvania Public Records Law sections.
Page 3 of a legal document detailing appeal procedures and right-to-know law analysis.
The image shows a printed legal document page with text about appeals, public records exemptions, and the Right to Know Law. It includes case citations like SWB Yankees L.L.C. v. Wintermantel and references Pennsylvania statutes such as 65 P.S. § 67.1101(c). The footer indicates it was printed from Centre County Online Access on 6/10/2015.
Legal text excerpt regarding appeals process and public record exemptions.
This is a single-page scan of a legal document, likely from a court opinion or brief, citing Pennsylvania statutes (65 P.S.) and case law. The text discusses the Office of Open Records' authority to hear appeals, the requirements for disclosing public records under the Right-to-Know Law (RTKL), and the burden of proof on agencies to demonstrate record exemptions.
Legal text analyzing the sufficiency of public records requests.
This is a single-page scan of a legal document, likely from a court opinion or brief. The visible text discusses the 'Requests are sufficiently specific' threshold matter regarding public records law (RTKL). It cites cases like Pa. State Troopers Ass'n v. Scolforo and mentions District Attorney Higgins.
Legal text analyzing the specificity of electronic record requests in Pennsylvania court cases.
The image shows a single page (page 6) of a typed legal opinion or brief, citing cases like Worcester and Baxter regarding whether email requests are sufficiently specific. It discusses requirements for subject matter and timeframes in discovery requests involving government agencies.
Page 7 of a legal opinion regarding public records access and OOR jurisdiction.
This is a scanned page (page 7) from a Pennsylvania Open Records appeal decision. The text discusses the specificity of document requests, the Office of the Appeals Officer's (OOR) jurisdiction over appeals involving criminal investigations, and cites statutes like 65 P.S. § 67.708(b)(16). It references cases such as Dep't of Environ. Prot. v. Legere and Silver v. City of Pittsburgh.
Legal text arguing that Bedford County District Attorney's Office records are not exempt under RTKL due to lack of criminal investigation content.
This is a scanned page from a legal document, likely a court brief or opinion, discussing the Right-to-Know Law (RTKL) and record exemptions. It references cases such as Mattes v. Westtown-East Goshen Regional Police Dep't and Levy v. Senate of Pa., arguing that possession by the District Attorney’s Office does not make records related to criminal investigations exempt.
Page 9 of a legal opinion addressing public records requests and appeal procedures.
The image shows a printed legal document page with text referencing Section 708(b)(16) of the RTKL, District Attorney Higgins, and the definition of 'record' under 65 P.S. § 67.102. The footer indicates it was printed from Centre County Online Access on 6/10/2015.
Legal text analyzing record definitions and evidentiary standards under the Right-to-Know Law.
This is a single-page scan of a legal opinion or brief discussing the definition of 'record' under the Pennsylvania Right-to-Know Law (RTKL). The page cites multiple court cases including Sherry v. Radnor Township, Moore v. Office of Open Records, and Gould v. North Strabane Township. It argues that unsworn statements by county officials are not competent evidence to withhold records.
Page 11 of a legal opinion discussing public records exemptions.
The image shows a printed legal document, likely from Centre County Online Access, dated 6/10/2015. It contains two numbered arguments (4 and 5) regarding whether certain records are exempt or do not exist under Pennsylvania’s Right-to-Know Law (RTKL). Citations include Van Osdol, Thomas v. Shohola Township, and Hodges.
Page 12 of a legal determination granting an appeal, signed by Joshua T. Young, Esq.
This is a scanned page from a legal document titled 'CONCLUSION', stating that a requester's appeal was granted and outlining procedures for record access and further appeals. It includes a signature line for Appeals Officer Joshua T. Young, Esq., dated April 29, 2015, and lists recipients via e-mail only.
A formal attestation document regarding third-party record access from the Centre County District Attorney's Office.
This is a scanned page of a legal document titled 'Attestation of Third Party' issued by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Office of the District Attorney for Centre County. The document includes contact information for Stacy Parks Miller and Mark S. Smith, lists records requested as cellular phone records belonging to judicial agencies, and contains numbered declarations about record handling practices.
Legal document excerpt regarding judicial records and county transparency.
This is a two-page scan of a legal filing or opinion dated June 5, 2015, from the Centre County District Attorney’s Office. The text references cases like Lackawanna County v. Pa Office of Open Records and discusses issues involving judges, record releases, and separation of powers.
Legal document excerpt regarding judicial record access and privacy rulings in Centre County.
This is a printed page (Page 3 of 6) from the Centre County District Attorney’s Office dated June 5, 2015. It contains numbered text describing Judge Stewart Kurtz’s rulings on public records, RTKL requests, and judicial privacy under Pennsylvania law.
Legal document outlining judicial record access and appeals processes for Centre County.
This is a printed page (Page 4 of 6) from a legal opinion or memo issued by the Centre County District Attorney's Office on June 5, 2015. The text discusses restrictions on obtaining records related to the Judiciary and District Attorney's Office, identifies specific officers for handling requests, and cites Pennsylvania laws regarding judicial review.
Legal brief excerpt regarding Right to Know Law jurisdiction over judicial records.
This is a scanned page (Page 5 of 6) from a legal document issued by the Centre County District Attorney's Office on June 5, 2015. The text discusses Pennsylvania Right to Know Law § 503 and cites cases like Lackawanna County Court of Common Pleas v. Office of Open Records regarding jurisdiction over judicial records.
Page 6 of a legal opinion signed by Stacy Parks Miller, Open Records Officer, Centre County District Attorney’s Office.
The image shows a printed legal document titled 'COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA COUNTY OF CENTRE' with arguments regarding judicial agency and record dissemination. It includes typed text, two signatures (Stacy Parks Miller and Emily J. McGinley), and a notarial seal dated May 2, 2018.
Scanned page of a legal exhibit with confidentiality notices and defendant’s exhibit labeling.
The image shows a printed document containing an email confidentiality notice dated November 4, 2014, referencing Craig Staudenmayer. It includes text stating the content is attorney-client privileged and confidential. In the bottom right corner is a black stamp reading 'DEFENDANT'S EXHIBIT' with handwritten notation 'A-7'. The footer indicates it was printed from Centre County Online Access on June 10, 2015.
Legal document excerpt analyzing RTKL precedent on judicial agency records.
This is a single-page scan of a legal memorandum or research brief discussing the Right to Know Law (RTKL). The text outlines findings about whether emails between a DA's office and County are subject to disclosure, citing case law such as Court of Common Pleas of Lackawanna County v. OOR and Frazier v. Philadelphia County Office of Prothonotary.
Legal memorandum addressing RTKL appeal jurisdiction and record disclosure standards.
The image shows a typed legal document from Craig J. Staudenmaier of Nauman, Smith, Shissler & Hall LLP discussing Right-to-Know Law (RTKL) jurisdiction over court records and personnel definitions under Pennsylvania law. It includes citations to Pa.R.J.A. No. 102 and notes on internal court records not being subject to disclosure.
Legal Order in Centre County, PA, restricting public records requests related to a plaintiff.
This is a scanned court order from the Civil Division of the Court of Common Pleas of Centre County, Pennsylvania. It orders that the County of Centre be enjoined from responding to any request for judicial records under the Pennsylvania Right-to-Know Law and directs such requests to the District Court Administrator instead.
Page of a court order regarding security and injunction dissolution.
The image shows a printed legal document with two numbered clauses: one continuing previously deposited security until action termination, and another dissolving a special injunction entered March 16. Below the text is a signature line labeled 'BY THE COURT,' with an illegible handwritten signature and initials 'S.J.' A footer indicates it was printed from Centre County Online Access on 6/10/2015.
Court Order Enjoining the County of Centre Regarding Judicial Records Requests
This is a scanned legal document titled 'ORDER' from the Civil Division of the Court of Common Pleas of Centre County, Pennsylvania. It orders that the County of Centre be enjoined from responding to requests for judicial records under the Pennsylvania Right-to-Know Law and directs such requests to the Prothonotary instead.
Page of a court order denying preliminary injunction requests and dissolving prior special injunctions.
The image shows the bottom portion of a printed legal document with three numbered rulings regarding injunctions against the McShane Firm, LLC, and Theodore C. Tanski. A handwritten signature appears below 'BY THE COURT,' followed by initials S.J., and a footer indicates it was printed from Centre County Online Access on 6/10/2015.
Court Order directing records requests to be forwarded to the District Court Administrator.
This is a scanned legal document titled 'ORDER' from the Centre County Court of Common Pleas in Pennsylvania. It was issued on May 13, 2015, and directs that all records requests related to the Judiciary shall be forwarded to Kendra J. Miknis, District Court Administrator. The order is signed by President Judge Thomas King Kistler.
Court order enjoining the County of Centre from responding to Right-to-Know requests regarding judicial records.
This is a scanned legal document titled 'ORDER' issued by the Court of Common Pleas of Centre County, Pennsylvania, on May 13, 2015. It enjoins the County of Centre from making any response to requests made pursuant to the Pennsylvania Right-to-Know law for judicial records relating to the Plaintiff. The order is signed by Stewart L. Kurtz, II, Senior Judge, Specially Presiding, 20th Judicial District.
Legal determination dismissing an appeal for open records related to judicial employee salaries.
This is a printed legal determination dated May 1, 2014, issued by the Pennsylvania Office of Open Records. It concerns a request by Jonathan Dunsinger for salary information from Susquehanna County's Adult and Juvenile Probation and Domestic Relations offices. The document concludes that the Office of Open Records lacks jurisdiction over these records because they pertain to judicial employees.
Final determination notice from a legal case involving Jonathan Dunsinger.
This is a two-page scan of a legal document titled 'IN THE MATTER OF JONATHAN DUNSINGER...'. It includes a final determination issued and mailed on May 1, 2014, with the Appeals Officer listed as Angela Eveler, Esq. The bottom notes copyright by Thomson Reuters (2015) and indicates it was printed from Centre County Online Access on June 10, 2015.
Exhibit 6 document page.
This is a scanned or printed page titled 'EXHIBIT 6', likely part of a legal or official document set. At the bottom, there is a small text indicating it was printed from Centre County Online Access on 6/10/2015 at 4:12:08 PM.
An official affidavit denying a right-to-know request based on judicial orders.
This is a typed legal document titled 'AFFIDAVIT' sworn by Tim Boyde, Director of Administrative Services for the County of Centre. It addresses an appeal regarding public records requests, citing Pennsylvania statutes and referencing attached orders and exhibits.
Notary acknowledgment page signed by Tim Boyde and notarized by Kimberly C. Smeltzer in Centre County, PA.
This is a scanned legal document page from the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, specifically a notary acknowledgment form for Tim Boyde dated May 28, 2015. The document includes handwritten signatures, a notarial seal, and references to Pennsylvania law regarding false statements. It appears to be part of an official record or court filing.
Final Determination document from the Pennsylvania Office of Open Records concerning Drew Johnson and The Washington Times.
This is a scanned page from a Final Determination issued by the Pennsylvania Office of Open Records. It outlines an appeal against Bedford County's denial of records requests related to District Attorney William Higgins, Jr., which was granted. The document includes case details, docket number AP 2015-0288, and references the Right-to-Know Law.
Page 2 of a legal document detailing record requests and responses between January and February 2015.
The image shows a scanned page from a legal document titled 'FACTUAL BACKGROUND' that lists three specific record requests made on January 13, 2015. The text details demands for telephone records, internet browsing history, and email account screenshots related to the District Attorney's Office. It further describes the County's denial of these requests on February 19, 2015, citing lack of specificity and exemption under public records laws.
Page of a legal document detailing appeals and right-to-know law analysis.
The image shows a printed legal document page with text about appeals, public records exemptions, and the Right to Know Law. It includes citations to statutes and case law such as SWB Yankees L.L.C. v. Wintermantel. The footer indicates it was printed from Centre County Online Access on 6/10/2015.
Legal text excerpt from a Pennsylvania court or administrative decision regarding open records and appeal procedures.
The image shows page 4 of a printed legal document dated 6/10/2015, citing Pennsylvania statutes (65 P.S.) on appeals by the Office of Open Records (OOR), public record disclosure under the Right-to-Know Law (RTKL), and burden of proof standards. The text references cases such as Bowling v. Office of Open Records and discusses whether hearings are required for appeals.
Page 5 of a legal brief analyzing the specificity of public records requests under Pennsylvania law.
This is a scanned page from a legal document, likely a court brief or opinion, discussing the sufficiency of public records requests under the Pennsylvania Right-to-Know Law (RTKL). The text cites several cases including Pa. State Troopers Ass'n v. Scolforo and Hodges v. Dep’t of Health, and references statutes such as 65 P.S. § 67.703.
Legal analysis of email record requests under Pennsylvania public records law.
This is a single-page scan from a legal document (page 6) discussing the sufficiency of FOIA/RTKL requests for emails. It references case law including Worcester, Mollick, Baxter, Melena v. Pa. Dep’t of Educ., and Doerschner v. Beaver County regarding specificity requirements.
Page 7 of a legal opinion regarding public records access and appeal jurisdiction.
This is a single-page scan of a formal legal document, likely an appellate court opinion. The text discusses the sufficiency of public records requests, the Office of the OOR's (Office of the Records Officer) jurisdiction over appeals, and exemptions related to criminal investigations under Pennsylvania law. It cites statutes such as 65 P.S. § 67.708(b)(16) and references cases like Dep't of Environ. Prot. v. Legere.
Legal text analyzing record exemptions and public access rights.
This is a scanned page from a legal document discussing records exemption under Section 708(b)(16) of the RTKL, citing cases like Mattes v. Westtown-East Goshen Regional Police Dep't. The text argues that possession by the District Attorney's Office does not make records exempt if they relate to criminal investigations.
Page 9 of a legal opinion addressing public records requests and appeal procedures.
This is a printed legal document page from Centre County Online Access dated June 10, 2015. It discusses exemptions from public access under Section 708(b)(16) of the RTKL, addresses an appeal by District Attorney Higgins regarding notification delays, and defines 'record' per 65 P.S. § 67.102.
Page 10 of a legal opinion analyzing record requests under the Right-to-Know Law.
This is a single-page scan from a legal document, likely an appellate brief or court opinion. The text discusses the definition of 'record' under the Pennsylvania Right-to-Know Law (RTKL) and argues that unsworn statements by county officials are not competent evidence to withhold records. It cites several Pennsylvania cases such as Sherry v. Radnor Township and Moore v. Office of Open Records.
Page 11 of a legal opinion addressing record exemption claims by the County and District Attorney Higgins.
The image shows a printed legal document, likely from a court case involving Centre County Online Access. It contains two main arguments (numbered 4 and 5) regarding whether certain records are exempt or do not exist within the County’s possession. Citations to Pennsylvania statutes and case law such as Van Osdol and Thomas v. Shohola Township appear throughout.
Page 12 of a legal determination document dated April 29, 2015, concluding an appeal process.
This is page 12 of a formal legal document titled 'CONCLUSION', stating that the Requester's appeal is granted and outlining procedures for further appeals to the Bedford County Court of Common Pleas. It includes a signature line signed by Joshua T. Young, Esq., Appeals Officer, and lists recipients via e-mail only.
Exhibit 7 document page.
The image shows a single-page document titled 'EXHIBIT 7' in bold, centered, uppercase serif typeface. At the bottom left, small text indicates it was printed from Centre County Online Access on 6/10/2015 at 4:12:08 PM.
Commissioners discuss cell phone policy changes following a court ruling.
A scanned document page titled 'Commissioners Upset by Judge's Ruling Against the County, May Change Cell Phone Policy' from State College, PA. It includes an embedded photo of three men in suits seated at a table with framed art on the wall behind them.
Printed news article from State College.com dated June 8, 2015, covering legal disputes and local stories.
The image shows a two-page printout of an online news article titled 'Commissioners Upset by Judge's Ruling Against the County,' featuring quotes, legal context about cell phone records, and a section labeled 'POPULAR STORIES' with underlined headlines. The footer includes copyright notice for StateCollege.com (2015), URL links, and print metadata indicating it was generated on 6/10/2015 at 4:12:08 PM.
Exhibit 8 document page.
The image shows a single-page document titled 'EXHIBIT 8' in bold, centered, uppercase serif typeface. At the bottom left, small print indicates it was printed from Centre County Online Access on 6/10/2015 at 4:12:08 PM.
Newspaper article on Centre County's appeal of Right to Know lawsuit decisions.
The image shows a printed newspaper article dated May 19, 2015, discussing Centre County officials' plan to appeal recent Right to Know rulings. A small photograph in the upper right corner depicts three men seated at a table with a framed picture behind them; no oversized bank check is visible.
Printed news article from StateCollege.com about Centre County administrative and policy decisions.
This is a scanned printout of a news article from StateCollege.com dated June 9, 2015. The main text discusses county administrator Tim Boyde’s interaction with Judge Tom Kistler regarding a proposal, followed by a vote to review cell phone policies. Below the article are underlined headlines for popular stories including one about Christopher Lee’s child sex abuse trial delay. A disclaimer and URL appear at the bottom.
The district attorney, Stacy Parks Miller, sued Judge Ruest and many county commissioners, including Ava’s ex-husband. The portion of the lawsuit against Judge Ruest stemmed from an incident in which an inmate I met, Ryan Richard, apparently asked his cellmate, who thought he would be released soon, to hire a hitman to kill someone in the district attorney’s office he got out. The cellmate reported this to the district attorney for, I assume, some leniency. Parks Miller wrote a fake order for the cellmate to show Ryan that the cellmate was indeed getting out. Needing a judge’s signature on the document, she either had Judge Ruest sign it or forged her signature. Handwriting experts later determined that the signature was likely not forged. However, Judge Ruest did not recall signing it; the cellmate was accidentally released and wound up back in Pam’s courtroom. This fiasco looked very bad for Parks Miller, who I suspect slipped the order into a stack of documents Judge Ruest needed to sign, knowing, as I’ve mentioned previously, that she doesn’t take the time to read the things she signs. Parks Miller was facing some serious charges of forgery, but the court eventually dismissed them. However, she decided to sue Judge Ruest for lying about having no recollection of signing the order, implicitly suggesting Parks Miller had forged her signature. Someone that had worked in the DA’s office also claimed that Parks Miller had forged the signature. If these forgery allegations were false, Parks Miller should be very mindful of false claims and how they can affect the accused’s life.
I have included the 60-page lawsuit and the 94-page request for sanctions in image galleries. While these documents are written in boring legalese, they are pretty entertaining to read, and the majority of the pages are exhibits, most of which are also quite fascinating. Both orders were submitted to the court by Parks Miller’s attorney, Bruce Castor. However, I suspect both were written primarily by Parks Miller, as they appear to be very personal and a bit deranged. If the name Bruce Castor sounds familiar, that’s because he was one of the attorneys willing to represent Donald Trump at his second impeachment trial. Most people thought his initial address to congress was a disaster, and another attorney did all subsequent speaking. He will come up again as Parks Miller’s attorney later in the book.
Parks Miller was also suing the county supervisors and asking that the county be held in contempt of court because they released some of the text messages she had sent using a county-issued phone after receiving a Freedom of Information Act request. The courts later determined that the supervisors should not have released the text messages. However, the messages revealed that Parks Miller had been texting Judge Lunsford during a trial in which both participated. This clear violation of court rules did not sit well in the community. Parks Miller’s defense to the public was that her “tough on crime” tactics upset defense attorneys who were being vindictive.
In Parks Miller’s lawsuit, the county supervisors used a defense of “high public official immunity,” which states that people cannot sue public officials for defamation for acts done while performing their duties as public officials. I will discuss this later when explaining the lawsuit I filed against Parks Miller, who used the same defense. You can read more about Parks Miller here.