{"id":353,"date":"2021-02-25T03:39:46","date_gmt":"2021-02-25T03:39:46","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/96.66.168.57:8080\/wordpress\/?page_id=353"},"modified":"2026-08-24T02:53:59","modified_gmt":"2026-08-24T02:53:59","slug":"intermission-14-thoughts-about-our-legal-system-part-1","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/?page_id=353","title":{"rendered":"Intermission 14:  Thoughts about Our Legal System, Part 1"},"content":{"rendered":"<audio class=\"wp-audio-shortcode\" id=\"audio-353-1\" preload=\"none\" style=\"width: 100%;\" controls=\"controls\"><source type=\"audio\/mpeg\" src=\"https:\/\/unstablefocus.mynetgear.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/Intermission-353-P01.mp3?_=1\" \/><a href=\"https:\/\/unstablefocus.mynetgear.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/Intermission-353-P01.mp3\">https:\/\/unstablefocus.mynetgear.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/Intermission-353-P01.mp3<\/a><\/audio>\r\n<div id=\"attachment_355\" style=\"width: 310px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-355\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-355\" src=\"https:\/\/unstablefocus.mynetgear.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/Stacy-300x263.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"263\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/Stacy-300x263.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/Stacy-1024x896.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/Stacy-768x672.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/Stacy.jpg 1337w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><p id=\"caption-attachment-355\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Former Centre County District Attorney Stacy Parks Miller.<\/p><\/div>\r\n<p>I now have two small-town (county) legal systems to compare. However, I am more familiar with the Centre County (PA) legal system than the Monroe County (MI) legal system. My experiences with the Monroe County system have been much better than my experiences with the Centre County system.<\/p>\r\n<p>While things seem to be turning around over the last couple of years, the Centre County legal system was a mess for the ten years before that. There is even a Facebook group called <a href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/search\/top?q=crisis%20in%20our%20courthouse\">Crisis in our Courthouse<\/a> about the mess. I did not create it and don&#8217;t know who did. It has documented much of the turmoil in great detail and contains more information about the stuff I will discuss briefly here.<\/p>\r\n<div style=\"display: flex; float: left; width: 400px; padding-right: 10pt;\">\r\n<style type=\"text\/css\">\n#foogallery-gallery-2416 .fg-image { width: 320px; }<\/style>\n\t\t\t<div class=\"foogallery foogallery-container foogallery-image-viewer foogallery-link-image foogallery-lightbox-foobox fg-center fg-image-viewer fg-ready fg-dark fg-border-thin fg-shadow-outline fg-loading-default fg-loaded-fade-in fg-caption-hover fg-hover-fade fg-hover-zoom fg-no-js\" id=\"foogallery-gallery-2416\" data-foogallery=\"{&quot;item&quot;:{&quot;showCaptionTitle&quot;:true,&quot;showCaptionDescription&quot;:true},&quot;lazy&quot;:true,&quot;src&quot;:&quot;src&quot;,&quot;srcset&quot;:&quot;srcset&quot;,&quot;template&quot;:{&quot;loop&quot;:true,&quot;autoplay&quot;:0}}\" style=\"--fg-title-line-clamp: 0; --fg-description-line-clamp: 0;\" >\n\t<div class=\"fiv-inner\">\n\t\t<div class=\"fiv-inner-container\">\n\t\t\t<div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-01.png\" data-caption-title=\"Scanned copy of a civil action complaint filed in Centre County Court.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image displays a typed legal document titled &#039;ROGERS CASTOR&#039; at the top left, listing attorneys for the plaintiff. The case is identified as &#039;STACY PARKS MILLER v. CENTRE COUNTY&#039; and other defendants, with &#039;COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CENTRE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA&#039; on the right side. A blue ink stamp reading &#039;FILED FOR RECORD 2015 AUG 28 PM 1:25 DEBRA C JANEL PROTHONOARY CENTRE COUNTY, PA&#039; appears in the lower right corner.\" data-attachment-id=\"2260\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-01\/3671927785.png\" alt=\"A scanned legal document showing a civil action lawsuit between Stacy Parks Miller as plaintiff and Centre County among others as defendants, with attorney information and court de\" title=\"Scanned copy of a civil action complaint filed in Centre County Court.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Scanned copy of a civil action complaint filed in Centre County Court.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image displays a typed legal document titled 'ROGERS CASTOR' at the top left, listing attorneys for the plaintiff. The case is identified as 'STACY PARKS MILLER v. CENTRE COUNTY' and other defendants, with 'COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CENTRE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA' on the right side. A blue ink stamp reading 'FILED FOR RECORD 2015 AUG 28 PM 1:25 DEBRA C JANEL PROTHONOARY CENTRE COUNTY, PA' appears in the lower right corner.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-02.png\" data-caption-title=\"Notice to defend a civil lawsuit filed in Centre County, Pennsylvania.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows a formal legal notice from the Court of Common Pleas, Centre County, PA. It lists Stacy Parks Miller as plaintiff and multiple individuals and entities as defendants. A handwritten number &#039;3434&#039; appears next to case number &#039;2015-&#039;. The document includes instructions for responding within twenty days.\" data-attachment-id=\"2261\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-02\/33087161.png\" alt=\"A scanned legal document titled &#039;NOTICE TO DEFEND&#039; listing plaintiffs and defendants in a Centre County, PA civil action.\" title=\"Notice to defend a civil lawsuit filed in Centre County, Pennsylvania.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Notice to defend a civil lawsuit filed in Centre County, Pennsylvania.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows a formal legal notice from the Court of Common Pleas, Centre County, PA. It lists Stacy Parks Miller as plaintiff and multiple individuals and entities as defendants. A handwritten number '3434' appears next to case number '2015-'. The document includes instructions for responding within twenty days.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-03.png\" data-caption-title=\"A flyer providing information on hiring a lawyer and available legal aid services.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows a single-page printed document titled &#039;LAWYER REFERRAL AND INFORMATION SERVICE&#039; from the Centre County Court Administration located at 102 South Allegheny Street, Bellefonte, PA 16823. The text explains that the office can provide information about hiring a lawyer and may offer referrals to agencies providing legal services at reduced fees or no fee for eligible persons.\" data-attachment-id=\"2262\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-03\/867027442.png\" alt=\"A printed document from the Lawyer Referral and Information Service at Centre County Court Administration in Bellefonte, PA, offering legal assistance information.\" title=\"A flyer providing information on hiring a lawyer and available legal aid services.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">A flyer providing information on hiring a lawyer and available legal aid services.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows a single-page printed document titled 'LAWYER REFERRAL AND INFORMATION SERVICE' from the Centre County Court Administration located at 102 South Allegheny Street, Bellefonte, PA 16823. The text explains that the office can provide information about hiring a lawyer and may offer referrals to agencies providing legal services at reduced fees or no fee for eligible persons.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-04.png\" data-caption-title=\"Scanned page of a civil complaint detailing allegations against Centre County District Attorney Stacy Parks Miller.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows a two-page legal document labeled &#039;COMPLAINT&#039;, featuring text under headings &#039;Preliminary Statement&#039; and &#039;Background&#039;. A blue ink stamp reading &#039;FILED FOR RECORD&#039; is visible on the right side, along with partial text indicating filing date and time. The document references Plaintiff Stacy Parks Miller and includes footnotes defining defendant classes.\" data-attachment-id=\"2263\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-04\/1824666200.png\" alt=\"A scanned legal document titled &#039;COMPLAINT&#039; with sections on Preliminary Statement and Background regarding District Attorney Stacy Parks Miller.\" title=\"Scanned page of a civil complaint detailing allegations against Centre County District Attorney Stacy Parks Miller.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Scanned page of a civil complaint detailing allegations against Centre County District Attorney Stacy Parks Miller.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows a two-page legal document labeled 'COMPLAINT', featuring text under headings 'Preliminary Statement' and 'Background'. A blue ink stamp reading 'FILED FOR RECORD' is visible on the right side, along with partial text indicating filing date and time. The document references Plaintiff Stacy Parks Miller and includes footnotes defining defendant classes.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-05.png\" data-caption-title=\"Document excerpt detailing District Attorney Parks Miller\u2019s activities and conflicts with Centre County Commissioners.\" data-caption-desc=\"This is a single-page scan of a formal document, likely part of a civil complaint or legal filing. It contains five numbered paragraphs (5\u20137) describing the District Attorney\u2019s re-election, professional rivals, and specific actions taken against county officials regarding prison investigations and sentencing policies.\" data-attachment-id=\"2264\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-05\/3545098654.png\" alt=\"A scanned page from a legal document listing numbered points about District Attorney Parks Miller&#039;s actions and policies.\" title=\"Document excerpt detailing District Attorney Parks Miller\u2019s activities and conflicts with Centre County Commissioners.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Document excerpt detailing District Attorney Parks Miller\u2019s activities and conflicts with Centre County Commissioners.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">This is a single-page scan of a formal document, likely part of a civil complaint or legal filing. It contains five numbered paragraphs (5\u20137) describing the District Attorney\u2019s re-election, professional rivals, and specific actions taken against county officials regarding prison investigations and sentencing policies.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-06.png\" data-caption-title=\"Page four of a civil complaint outlining allegations against Parks Miller and related individuals.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows a printed document page with numbered paragraphs discussing legal actions taken by District Attorney Parks Miller in 2012. It mentions investigations into drug trafficking, search warrants served on the Masorti Law Group, and employment history of Defendant Shutt.\" data-attachment-id=\"2265\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-06\/141040846.png\" alt=\"A scanned page from a legal complaint detailing events involving District Attorney Parks Miller, Defendant Shutt, and the Masorti Law Group.\" title=\"Page four of a civil complaint outlining allegations against Parks Miller and related individuals.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Page four of a civil complaint outlining allegations against Parks Miller and related individuals.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows a printed document page with numbered paragraphs discussing legal actions taken by District Attorney Parks Miller in 2012. It mentions investigations into drug trafficking, search warrants served on the Masorti Law Group, and employment history of Defendant Shutt.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-07.png\" data-caption-title=\"Page 5 of a civil complaint alleging defamation and murder-for-hire by attorneys Glantz and Cantorna.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows a printed document, likely a court filing or legal complaint, with numbered paragraphs recounting events involving District Attorney Parks Miller. It includes allegations about child abuse cases, expert testimony failures, retaliatory attacks, and credible information received in early summer 2013 regarding solicitation to kill Assistant District Attorney Nathan Boob.\" data-attachment-id=\"2266\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-07\/977079173.png\" alt=\"A scanned page from a legal complaint detailing allegations against Defendants Glantz and Cantorna regarding child abuse cases and false accusations.\" title=\"Page 5 of a civil complaint alleging defamation and murder-for-hire by attorneys Glantz and Cantorna.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Page 5 of a civil complaint alleging defamation and murder-for-hire by attorneys Glantz and Cantorna.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows a printed document, likely a court filing or legal complaint, with numbered paragraphs recounting events involving District Attorney Parks Miller. It includes allegations about child abuse cases, expert testimony failures, retaliatory attacks, and credible information received in early summer 2013 regarding solicitation to kill Assistant District Attorney Nathan Boob.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-08.png\" data-caption-title=\"Page excerpt from a civil complaint detailing events involving ADA Nathan Boob and Ryan Richard.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows a single page of text from a legal document, with paragraph numbers 22 through 30 visible. The text discusses Assistant District Attorney Nathan Boob\u2019s employment at the Centre County District Attorney\u2019s Office and describes actions taken against Ryan Richard, including new charges brought by ADA Boob.\" data-attachment-id=\"2267\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-08\/3065506714.png\" alt=\"A scanned page from a legal document showing numbered paragraphs discussing Assistant District Attorney Nathan Boob and Ryan Richard.\" title=\"Page excerpt from a civil complaint detailing events involving ADA Nathan Boob and Ryan Richard.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Page excerpt from a civil complaint detailing events involving ADA Nathan Boob and Ryan Richard.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows a single page of text from a legal document, with paragraph numbers 22 through 30 visible. The text discusses Assistant District Attorney Nathan Boob\u2019s employment at the Centre County District Attorney\u2019s Office and describes actions taken against Ryan Richard, including new charges brought by ADA Boob.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-09.png\" data-caption-title=\"Page 7 of a civil complaint detailing law enforcement actions involving Ryan Richard and ADA Boob.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows a single page of text from a legal document, specifically paragraphs 31 through 39. The content discusses District Attorney Parks Miller&#039;s conclusions about potential danger to ADA Boob, Albro&#039;s prior work with Trooper James Ellis, and the setup of a sting operation involving an undercover trooper posing as &#039;Home Cookin&#039;.\" data-attachment-id=\"2268\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-09\/3388780295.png\" alt=\"A scanned page from a legal document showing numbered paragraphs discussing law enforcement operations and witness testimony.\" title=\"Page 7 of a civil complaint detailing law enforcement actions involving Ryan Richard and ADA Boob.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Page 7 of a civil complaint detailing law enforcement actions involving Ryan Richard and ADA Boob.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows a single page of text from a legal document, specifically paragraphs 31 through 39. The content discusses District Attorney Parks Miller's conclusions about potential danger to ADA Boob, Albro's prior work with Trooper James Ellis, and the setup of a sting operation involving an undercover trooper posing as 'Home Cookin'.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-10.png\" data-caption-title=\"Page 8 of a civil complaint detailing a covert investigation into a murder-for-hire scheme.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows a single page from a legal document, likely a civil complaint, containing numbered paragraphs from 40 to 48. The text describes a plan involving law enforcement, bail procedures, and secret recordings to gather evidence against Ryan Richard for a murder-for-hire plot. It mentions individuals named Albro and Parks Miller in the context of judicial actions.\" data-attachment-id=\"2269\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-10\/2489471708.png\" alt=\"A scanned page of a legal document with numbered paragraphs discussing a murder-for-hire plot involving Ryan Richard and Albro.\" title=\"Page 8 of a civil complaint detailing a covert investigation into a murder-for-hire scheme.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Page 8 of a civil complaint detailing a covert investigation into a murder-for-hire scheme.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows a single page from a legal document, likely a civil complaint, containing numbered paragraphs from 40 to 48. The text describes a plan involving law enforcement, bail procedures, and secret recordings to gather evidence against Ryan Richard for a murder-for-hire plot. It mentions individuals named Albro and Parks Miller in the context of judicial actions.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-11.png\" data-caption-title=\"Scanned text from a legal document detailing investigative procedures and court approvals.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows a single page of a typed legal document containing numbered paragraphs (49\u201358) describing law enforcement actions, including transferring an individual to jail under a false name and obtaining wiretap approval from Judge Pamela Ruest. The text references District Attorney Parks Miller, Albro\u2019s lawyer Matthew McClenahan, and Pennsylvania State Police involvement.\" data-attachment-id=\"2270\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-11\/2677765998.png\" alt=\"A scanned page of a legal document with numbered paragraphs discussing a plan involving bail, jail transfer, and wiretaps.\" title=\"Scanned text from a legal document detailing investigative procedures and court approvals.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Scanned text from a legal document detailing investigative procedures and court approvals.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows a single page of a typed legal document containing numbered paragraphs (49\u201358) describing law enforcement actions, including transferring an individual to jail under a false name and obtaining wiretap approval from Judge Pamela Ruest. The text references District Attorney Parks Miller, Albro\u2019s lawyer Matthew McClenahan, and Pennsylvania State Police involvement.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-12.png\" data-caption-title=\"Scanned text from a civil complaint detailing legal procedures involving judges, attorneys, and bail orders.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows a single page of a typed legal document with paragraph numbers 59 to 66. The text describes interactions between defendants, prosecutors, and a judge regarding wiretaps and pretend bail orders. A page number &#039;10&#039; is visible at the bottom center.\" data-attachment-id=\"2271\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-12\/1153335870.png\" alt=\"A scanned page from a legal document showing numbered paragraphs 59 through 66 discussing wiretaps, bail orders, and court proceedings.\" title=\"Scanned text from a civil complaint detailing legal procedures involving judges, attorneys, and bail orders.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Scanned text from a civil complaint detailing legal procedures involving judges, attorneys, and bail orders.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows a single page of a typed legal document with paragraph numbers 59 to 66. The text describes interactions between defendants, prosecutors, and a judge regarding wiretaps and pretend bail orders. A page number '10' is visible at the bottom center.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-13.png\" data-caption-title=\"Page from a civil complaint detailing events surrounding a wiretap and legal operations in Centre County.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows a printed legal document, likely a civil complaint or court filing, with numbered paragraphs discussing a wiretap at Centre County Prison and a sting operation involving Defendant Shutt. The text references Attorney Sean McGraw and Defendant Ruest in connection with a pretend order and false affidavit.\" data-attachment-id=\"2272\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-13\/1995150709.png\" alt=\"A scanned legal document page with numbered paragraphs discussing a wiretap in Centre County Prison and a sting operation involving Defendant Shutt.\" title=\"Page from a civil complaint detailing events surrounding a wiretap and legal operations in Centre County.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Page from a civil complaint detailing events surrounding a wiretap and legal operations in Centre County.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows a printed legal document, likely a civil complaint or court filing, with numbered paragraphs discussing a wiretap at Centre County Prison and a sting operation involving Defendant Shutt. The text references Attorney Sean McGraw and Defendant Ruest in connection with a pretend order and false affidavit.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-14.png\" data-caption-title=\"Page 12 of a legal document detailing allegations against Defendants regarding forged court orders and misuse of public resources.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows a single page from a legal filing containing numbered paragraphs (75\u201380) that describe events involving multiple defendants, an undercover investigation, and false accusations filed by one defendant against another. The text references District Attorney Parks Miller, Judge Ruest, and the Office of Attorney General in connection with alleged forgery and improper allocation of county resources.\" data-attachment-id=\"2273\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-14\/696544991.png\" alt=\"A scanned legal document page with numbered paragraphs discussing a civil case involving defendants, undercover operations, and allegations of forgery.\" title=\"Page 12 of a legal document detailing allegations against Defendants regarding forged court orders and misuse of public resources.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Page 12 of a legal document detailing allegations against Defendants regarding forged court orders and misuse of public resources.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows a single page from a legal filing containing numbered paragraphs (75\u201380) that describe events involving multiple defendants, an undercover investigation, and false accusations filed by one defendant against another. The text references District Attorney Parks Miller, Judge Ruest, and the Office of Attorney General in connection with alleged forgery and improper allocation of county resources.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-15.png\" data-caption-title=\"Page 13 of a civil complaint detailing legal actions against county and lawyer defendants.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows a single page from a legal document with numbered paragraphs (81\u201387) describing alleged misconduct by various defendants. The text references District Attorney Parks Miller, Bellefonte Borough, forgery laws in Pennsylvania, and claims of false allegations made by Richard Shutt.\" data-attachment-id=\"2274\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-15\/2517349657.png\" alt=\"A scanned page from a legal document showing numbered paragraphs discussing defendants, plaintiffs, and allegations of forgery.\" title=\"Page 13 of a civil complaint detailing legal actions against county and lawyer defendants.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Page 13 of a civil complaint detailing legal actions against county and lawyer defendants.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows a single page from a legal document with numbered paragraphs (81\u201387) describing alleged misconduct by various defendants. The text references District Attorney Parks Miller, Bellefonte Borough, forgery laws in Pennsylvania, and claims of false allegations made by Richard Shutt.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-16.png\" data-caption-title=\"Scanned text from a civil complaint regarding police investigation procedures and grand jury reports.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows a single page of a typed legal document with paragraph numbers 88 through 95. The text discusses Pennsylvania law on law enforcement ruses, the Bellefonte Police decision to refer a case to the State Police, and subsequent findings by a grand jury regarding Centre County Commissioners&#039; authority.\" data-attachment-id=\"2275\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-16\/1294876745.png\" alt=\"A scanned page from a legal document showing numbered paragraphs discussing Pennsylvania law, police investigations, and grand jury findings.\" title=\"Scanned text from a civil complaint regarding police investigation procedures and grand jury reports.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Scanned text from a civil complaint regarding police investigation procedures and grand jury reports.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows a single page of a typed legal document with paragraph numbers 88 through 95. The text discusses Pennsylvania law on law enforcement ruses, the Bellefonte Police decision to refer a case to the State Police, and subsequent findings by a grand jury regarding Centre County Commissioners' authority.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-17.png\" data-caption-title=\"Page 15 of a legal complaint detailing events surrounding a January 2015 Centre County Commissioners meeting.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows page 15 of a typed legal document containing numbered paragraphs from 96 to 102. The text discusses actions taken by the Centre County Commissioners, appearances by Bernard Cantorna and Defendant Andrew Shubin at a January 20, 2015 meeting, false statements made about an investigation, and a subsequent search warrant executed on January 24, 2015.\" data-attachment-id=\"2276\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-17\/2138789634.png\" alt=\"A scanned legal document page with numbered paragraphs discussing Centre County Commissioners, Bernard Cantorna, Andrew Shubin, and a January 2015 meeting.\" title=\"Page 15 of a legal complaint detailing events surrounding a January 2015 Centre County Commissioners meeting.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Page 15 of a legal complaint detailing events surrounding a January 2015 Centre County Commissioners meeting.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows page 15 of a typed legal document containing numbered paragraphs from 96 to 102. The text discusses actions taken by the Centre County Commissioners, appearances by Bernard Cantorna and Defendant Andrew Shubin at a January 20, 2015 meeting, false statements made about an investigation, and a subsequent search warrant executed on January 24, 2015.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-18.png\" data-caption-title=\"Page 16 of a civil complaint detailing grand jury findings on signature evidence.\" data-caption-desc=\"This is a single-page scan of a legal document, likely a civil complaint or indictment. The text includes numbered paragraphs (103\u2013109) discussing court findings regarding signatures on bail orders and investigations into a murder-for-hire plot. It references defendants, plaintiffs, handwriting experts, and law enforcement officials.\" data-attachment-id=\"2277\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-18\/4092704541.png\" alt=\"A scanned page from a legal document showing numbered paragraphs discussing court findings on signatures and investigations.\" title=\"Page 16 of a civil complaint detailing grand jury findings on signature evidence.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Page 16 of a civil complaint detailing grand jury findings on signature evidence.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">This is a single-page scan of a legal document, likely a civil complaint or indictment. The text includes numbered paragraphs (103\u2013109) discussing court findings regarding signatures on bail orders and investigations into a murder-for-hire plot. It references defendants, plaintiffs, handwriting experts, and law enforcement officials.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-19.png\" data-caption-title=\"Page 17 of a civil complaint detailing allegations regarding search warrants and media exposure.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows a single page from a legal document with paragraph numbers 109 through 116 visible. The text discusses the Plaintiff&#039;s claims about defendants acting recklessly in obtaining search warrants, media broadcasting images of belongings being carried out of an office, and seizure of sensitive law enforcement information.\" data-attachment-id=\"2278\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-19\/2361062272.png\" alt=\"A scanned page from a legal document showing numbered paragraphs discussing search warrants, media coverage, and law enforcement actions.\" title=\"Page 17 of a civil complaint detailing allegations regarding search warrants and media exposure.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Page 17 of a civil complaint detailing allegations regarding search warrants and media exposure.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows a single page from a legal document with paragraph numbers 109 through 116 visible. The text discusses the Plaintiff's claims about defendants acting recklessly in obtaining search warrants, media broadcasting images of belongings being carried out of an office, and seizure of sensitive law enforcement information.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-20.png\" data-caption-title=\"Page 18 of a civil complaint detailing allegations against county officials regarding false statements and a search warrant.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows a single page from a legal document with paragraph numbers 117 through 122. The text discusses defendants Exarchos, Dershem, and Pipe, mentions a grand jury exoneration on July 31, 2015, and references an unsealed search warrant that negatively impacted an investigation into Nathan Boob.\" data-attachment-id=\"2279\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-20\/4291962589.png\" alt=\"A scanned page from a legal document containing numbered paragraphs discussing plaintiffs, defendants, commissioners, and search warrants.\" title=\"Page 18 of a civil complaint detailing allegations against county officials regarding false statements and a search warrant.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Page 18 of a civil complaint detailing allegations against county officials regarding false statements and a search warrant.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows a single page from a legal document with paragraph numbers 117 through 122. The text discusses defendants Exarchos, Dershem, and Pipe, mentions a grand jury exoneration on July 31, 2015, and references an unsealed search warrant that negatively impacted an investigation into Nathan Boob.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-21.png\" data-caption-title=\"Page 19 of a civil complaint detailing alleged retaliatory actions by defendants.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows a single page from a legal document with paragraph numbers 123 through 128. The text discusses criminal investigations involving murder-for-hire plots and mentions specific individuals like Ryan Richard, ADA Boob, and Parks Miller. A section heading reads &#039;IV. The Attacks Continue&#039;.\" data-attachment-id=\"2280\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-21\/1068301141.png\" alt=\"A scanned page from a legal document containing numbered paragraphs discussing criminal investigations, defendants&#039; actions, and retaliation against law enforcement.\" title=\"Page 19 of a civil complaint detailing alleged retaliatory actions by defendants.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Page 19 of a civil complaint detailing alleged retaliatory actions by defendants.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows a single page from a legal document with paragraph numbers 123 through 128. The text discusses criminal investigations involving murder-for-hire plots and mentions specific individuals like Ryan Richard, ADA Boob, and Parks Miller. A section heading reads 'IV. The Attacks Continue'.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-22.png\" data-caption-title=\"Page excerpt detailing allegations regarding the dissemination of fabricated judicial records.\" data-caption-desc=\"This is a single-page scan of a legal complaint or court filing. The text includes numbered paragraphs (129-134) discussing defendants directing requests for &#039;Judicial Records&#039; and creating color-coded spreadsheets to highlight contacts between court members and District Attorney staff.\" data-attachment-id=\"2281\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-22\/3834187269.png\" alt=\"A scanned page from a legal document containing numbered paragraphs discussing defendants, Right-to-Know requests, and judicial records.\" title=\"Page excerpt detailing allegations regarding the dissemination of fabricated judicial records.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Page excerpt detailing allegations regarding the dissemination of fabricated judicial records.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">This is a single-page scan of a legal complaint or court filing. The text includes numbered paragraphs (129-134) discussing defendants directing requests for 'Judicial Records' and creating color-coded spreadsheets to highlight contacts between court members and District Attorney staff.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-23.png\" data-caption-title=\"Page 21 of a civil complaint detailing allegations against Defendants regarding illegal record access and attempts to remove the District Attorney.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image displays a single page from a legal document, identified by the filename context as part of a civil complaint involving Parks Miller. The text is organized into numbered paragraphs (135\u2013142) discussing attorney conduct, personal information exposure, and efforts to exclude the District Attorney from her role.\" data-attachment-id=\"2282\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-23\/3604748622.png\" alt=\"A scanned page from a legal document showing numbered paragraphs discussing defendants, plaintiffs, and judicial records.\" title=\"Page 21 of a civil complaint detailing allegations against Defendants regarding illegal record access and attempts to remove the District Attorney.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Page 21 of a civil complaint detailing allegations against Defendants regarding illegal record access and attempts to remove the District Attorney.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image displays a single page from a legal document, identified by the filename context as part of a civil complaint involving Parks Miller. The text is organized into numbered paragraphs (135\u2013142) discussing attorney conduct, personal information exposure, and efforts to exclude the District Attorney from her role.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-24.png\" data-caption-title=\"Scanned text from a legal document detailing court proceedings and appeals.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows a single page of a typed legal document with paragraph numbers 143 through 150. The text discusses rulings by Judge Stewart Kurtz, preliminary injunctions issued to the County, violations of those orders, and subsequent appeals to the Commonwealth Court and Pennsylvania Office of Open Records.\" data-attachment-id=\"2283\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-24\/2310267620.png\" alt=\"A scanned page from a legal document showing numbered paragraphs discussing court rulings, injunctions, and appeals involving Judge Kurtz and the County.\" title=\"Scanned text from a legal document detailing court proceedings and appeals.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Scanned text from a legal document detailing court proceedings and appeals.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows a single page of a typed legal document with paragraph numbers 143 through 150. The text discusses rulings by Judge Stewart Kurtz, preliminary injunctions issued to the County, violations of those orders, and subsequent appeals to the Commonwealth Court and Pennsylvania Office of Open Records.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-25.png\" data-caption-title=\"Page excerpt from a civil complaint detailing legal actions and grand jury investigation details.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image displays a single page of text from a legal document, likely a civil complaint, with paragraph numbers 151 through 158. It discusses judge rulings, county defendants&#039; behavior, and the initiation of a grand jury investigation by the Office of Attorney General. The bottom center shows the page number &#039;23&#039;.\" data-attachment-id=\"2284\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-25\/909916450.png\" alt=\"A scanned page from a legal document showing numbered paragraphs discussing court proceedings, jury investigations, and witness testimony.\" title=\"Page excerpt from a civil complaint detailing legal actions and grand jury investigation details.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Page excerpt from a civil complaint detailing legal actions and grand jury investigation details.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image displays a single page of text from a legal document, likely a civil complaint, with paragraph numbers 151 through 158. It discusses judge rulings, county defendants' behavior, and the initiation of a grand jury investigation by the Office of Attorney General. The bottom center shows the page number '23'.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-26.png\" data-caption-title=\"Page excerpt from a civil complaint regarding alleged misconduct by Defendant Ruest.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image displays a single page of text from a legal document, likely a civil complaint, with paragraph numbers 159 through 165. The text discusses statements made by Defendant Ruest, investigations involving wiretaps in Centre County Prison, handwriting expert testimony on signatures, and allegations of illegal prosecution.\" data-attachment-id=\"2285\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-26\/3977890930.png\" alt=\"A scanned page from a legal document showing numbered paragraphs discussing Defendant Ruest, wiretaps, and signature analysis.\" title=\"Page excerpt from a civil complaint regarding alleged misconduct by Defendant Ruest.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Page excerpt from a civil complaint regarding alleged misconduct by Defendant Ruest.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image displays a single page of text from a legal document, likely a civil complaint, with paragraph numbers 159 through 165. The text discusses statements made by Defendant Ruest, investigations involving wiretaps in Centre County Prison, handwriting expert testimony on signatures, and allegations of illegal prosecution.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-27.png\" data-caption-title=\"Page 25 of a civil complaint detailing jury findings on various legal issues.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows a single page from a legal document, likely a civil complaint, containing numbered paragraphs (166\u2013173) that summarize jury findings regarding bail orders, theft of services allegations, and the printing of an election guide. The text references multiple defendants including Ruest, Parks Miller, Shutt, and Andrew Shubin, and discusses issues such as falsified affidavits and defamation.\" data-attachment-id=\"2286\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-27\/3746356025.png\" alt=\"A scanned legal document page with numbered paragraphs discussing jury findings on bail orders, theft of services allegations, and election guide printing.\" title=\"Page 25 of a civil complaint detailing jury findings on various legal issues.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Page 25 of a civil complaint detailing jury findings on various legal issues.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows a single page from a legal document, likely a civil complaint, containing numbered paragraphs (166\u2013173) that summarize jury findings regarding bail orders, theft of services allegations, and the printing of an election guide. The text references multiple defendants including Ruest, Parks Miller, Shutt, and Andrew Shubin, and discusses issues such as falsified affidavits and defamation.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-28.png\" data-caption-title=\"Page 26 of a civil complaint detailing biographical information of the plaintiff and defendants.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows a printed legal document page with text paragraphs numbered 174 through 182 under the heading &#039;VI. Biographical Information.&#039; It lists personal details including names, addresses, and professional roles for Stacy Parks Miller, Michelle Shutt, Philip Masorti, Bernard Cantorna, Andrew Shubin, and Sean McGraw.\" data-attachment-id=\"2287\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-28\/1405500198.png\" alt=\"A scanned page from a legal document containing numbered paragraphs discussing biographical information of individuals involved in a civil complaint.\" title=\"Page 26 of a civil complaint detailing biographical information of the plaintiff and defendants.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Page 26 of a civil complaint detailing biographical information of the plaintiff and defendants.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows a printed legal document page with text paragraphs numbered 174 through 182 under the heading 'VI. Biographical Information.' It lists personal details including names, addresses, and professional roles for Stacy Parks Miller, Michelle Shutt, Philip Masorti, Bernard Cantorna, Andrew Shubin, and Sean McGraw.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-29.png\" data-caption-title=\"Page 27 of a civil complaint listing multiple defendants from Centre County, PA.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows a printed legal document page numbered 27, containing paragraphs 183 through 189 that identify adult individuals as defendants in a lawsuit. The text includes their addresses in Bellefonte and State College, Pennsylvania, along with their professional roles such as judge, commissioner, administrator, and solicitor.\" data-attachment-id=\"2288\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-29\/747470779.png\" alt=\"A scanned page from a legal document listing defendants with addresses and roles in Centre County, Pennsylvania.\" title=\"Page 27 of a civil complaint listing multiple defendants from Centre County, PA.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Page 27 of a civil complaint listing multiple defendants from Centre County, PA.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows a printed legal document page numbered 27, containing paragraphs 183 through 189 that identify adult individuals as defendants in a lawsuit. The text includes their addresses in Bellefonte and State College, Pennsylvania, along with their professional roles such as judge, commissioner, administrator, and solicitor.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-30.png\" data-caption-title=\"Page from a civil complaint detailing defamation claims against Centre County.\" data-caption-desc=\"This is a single-page scan of a legal document, specifically a civil complaint. It includes an address for the Defendant (Centre County) and numbered paragraphs (190\u2013198) outlining allegations of false and defamatory statements regarding criminal and professional misconduct. The text references harm to the plaintiff\u2019s reputation in various communities.\" data-attachment-id=\"2289\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-30\/1897103968.png\" alt=\"A scanned legal document page showing paragraphs 190\u2013198 of a civil complaint titled &#039;COUNT I \u2013 DEFAMATION\/FALSE LIGHT&#039; against Defendant Centre County.\" title=\"Page from a civil complaint detailing defamation claims against Centre County.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Page from a civil complaint detailing defamation claims against Centre County.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">This is a single-page scan of a legal document, specifically a civil complaint. It includes an address for the Defendant (Centre County) and numbered paragraphs (190\u2013198) outlining allegations of false and defamatory statements regarding criminal and professional misconduct. The text references harm to the plaintiff\u2019s reputation in various communities.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-31.png\" data-caption-title=\"Page from a civil complaint detailing defamation claims and requesting monetary damages.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows a printed legal document page with numbered paragraphs discussing defamation allegations against Defendants. It includes a request for compensatory and punitive damages totaling over $50,000 and introduces &#039;COUNT II \u2013 INJURIUS FALSEHOOD&#039; (likely intended as &#039;INJURIOUS FALSEHOOD&#039;). The text references ongoing criminal investigations involving law enforcement and attempted murder.\" data-attachment-id=\"2290\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-31\/2062198738.png\" alt=\"A scanned legal document page showing paragraphs 199\u2013206 of a civil complaint regarding defamation, including a demand for damages and the heading &#039;COUNT II \u2013 INJURIUS FALSEHOOD&#039;.\" title=\"Page from a civil complaint detailing defamation claims and requesting monetary damages.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Page from a civil complaint detailing defamation claims and requesting monetary damages.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows a printed legal document page with numbered paragraphs discussing defamation allegations against Defendants. It includes a request for compensatory and punitive damages totaling over $50,000 and introduces 'COUNT II \u2013 INJURIUS FALSEHOOD' (likely intended as 'INJURIOUS FALSEHOOD'). The text references ongoing criminal investigations involving law enforcement and attempted murder.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-32.png\" data-caption-title=\"Page 30 of a civil complaint alleging malicious prosecution.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image displays a printed legal document, specifically Count III of a civil complaint titled &#039;Plaintiff v. Defendants Exarchos, Dersham, Pipe, Glantz, &amp;amp; Ruest&#039;. The text details allegations of malicious prosecution and includes numbered paragraphs from 207 to 213.\" data-attachment-id=\"2291\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-32\/2714718850.png\" alt=\"A scanned legal document page showing a civil complaint with paragraphs numbered 207 to 213 detailing malicious prosecution claims.\" title=\"Page 30 of a civil complaint alleging malicious prosecution.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Page 30 of a civil complaint alleging malicious prosecution.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image displays a printed legal document, specifically Count III of a civil complaint titled 'Plaintiff v. Defendants Exarchos, Dersham, Pipe, Glantz, &amp; Ruest'. The text details allegations of malicious prosecution and includes numbered paragraphs from 207 to 213.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-33.png\" data-caption-title=\"Page 31 of a civil complaint detailing claims for compensatory and punitive damages.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows a printed legal document titled &#039;COUNT IV \u2013 INTENTIONAL AND\/OR NEGLIGENT INFLECTION OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS&#039;. It includes paragraphs 214\u2013219 discussing the importance of the District Attorney office, public trust, and emotional distress suffered by the Plaintiff. The text references Pennsylvania law and Centre County.\" data-attachment-id=\"2292\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-33\/2476361161.png\" alt=\"A scanned legal document page showing a civil complaint with paragraphs numbered 214 through 219, discussing intentional infliction of emotional distress and damages.\" title=\"Page 31 of a civil complaint detailing claims for compensatory and punitive damages.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Page 31 of a civil complaint detailing claims for compensatory and punitive damages.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows a printed legal document titled 'COUNT IV \u2013 INTENTIONAL AND\/OR NEGLIGENT INFLECTION OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS'. It includes paragraphs 214\u2013219 discussing the importance of the District Attorney office, public trust, and emotional distress suffered by the Plaintiff. The text references Pennsylvania law and Centre County.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-34.png\" data-caption-title=\"Page 32 of a civil complaint detailing allegations of conspiracy and requesting damages.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image displays a printed legal document with numbered paragraphs discussing emotional distress, harm, and a conspiracy to illegally prosecute the plaintiff. It includes a demand for compensatory and punitive damages under Count V - Conspiracy.\" data-attachment-id=\"2293\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-34\/3438657123.png\" alt=\"A scanned page from a legal document showing paragraphs of text, numbered sections, and a heading for Count V - Conspiracy.\" title=\"Page 32 of a civil complaint detailing allegations of conspiracy and requesting damages.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Page 32 of a civil complaint detailing allegations of conspiracy and requesting damages.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image displays a printed legal document with numbered paragraphs discussing emotional distress, harm, and a conspiracy to illegally prosecute the plaintiff. It includes a demand for compensatory and punitive damages under Count V - Conspiracy.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-35.png\" data-caption-title=\"Page 33 of a civil complaint alleging common law abuse of process.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image displays a printed legal document, specifically Count VI of a civil complaint titled &#039;Plaintiff v. Defendants Exarchos, Dershem, Pipe, Glantz, Cantorna, Shubin, Boyde &amp;amp; McGraw&#039;. It includes numbered paragraphs (229\u2013234) describing procedural misconduct and concludes with a demand for compensatory damages exceeding $50,000.\" data-attachment-id=\"2294\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-35\/1937401253.png\" alt=\"A scanned legal document page showing a civil complaint with numbered paragraphs detailing abuse of process claims and demands for damages.\" title=\"Page 33 of a civil complaint alleging common law abuse of process.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Page 33 of a civil complaint alleging common law abuse of process.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image displays a printed legal document, specifically Count VI of a civil complaint titled 'Plaintiff v. Defendants Exarchos, Dershem, Pipe, Glantz, Cantorna, Shubin, Boyde &amp; McGraw'. It includes numbered paragraphs (229\u2013234) describing procedural misconduct and concludes with a demand for compensatory damages exceeding $50,000.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-36.png\" data-caption-title=\"Page 34 of a civil complaint detailing negligence and federal claim counts against multiple defendants.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image displays a printed legal document page with numbered paragraphs under two counts: Count VII (Negligence) and Count VIII (Claim Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983). The text includes allegations of failure to investigate, damages sought, and incorporation of prior paragraphs.\" data-attachment-id=\"2295\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-36\/2824835317.png\" alt=\"A scanned legal document page showing Count VII - Negligence and Count VIII - Claim Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983 in a civil complaint.\" title=\"Page 34 of a civil complaint detailing negligence and federal claim counts against multiple defendants.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Page 34 of a civil complaint detailing negligence and federal claim counts against multiple defendants.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image displays a printed legal document page with numbered paragraphs under two counts: Count VII (Negligence) and Count VIII (Claim Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983). The text includes allegations of failure to investigate, damages sought, and incorporation of prior paragraphs.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-37.png\" data-caption-title=\"Page 35 of a civil complaint detailing claims against Centre County officials for constitutional violations.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image displays a printed legal document, specifically pages from a civil complaint. It includes numbered paragraphs (242-243) arguing government liability and denial of due process, followed by &#039;WHEREFORE&#039; demands for damages. A section titled &#039;COUNT IX \u2013 CLAIM PURSUANT TO 42 U.S.C. 1983&#039; lists specific allegations regarding Fourth Amendment violations related to searches and seizures.\" data-attachment-id=\"2296\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-37\/2584381374.png\" alt=\"A scanned legal document page showing paragraphs 242-243 and Count IX of a civil complaint involving Centre County Commissioners and Fourth Amendment violations.\" title=\"Page 35 of a civil complaint detailing claims against Centre County officials for constitutional violations.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Page 35 of a civil complaint detailing claims against Centre County officials for constitutional violations.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image displays a printed legal document, specifically pages from a civil complaint. It includes numbered paragraphs (242-243) arguing government liability and denial of due process, followed by 'WHEREFORE' demands for damages. A section titled 'COUNT IX \u2013 CLAIM PURSUANT TO 42 U.S.C. 1983' lists specific allegations regarding Fourth Amendment violations related to searches and seizures.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-38.png\" data-caption-title=\"Legal document excerpt with wherefore clause and attorney signature block.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows the bottom portion of a civil complaint or legal pleading. It includes numbered point 5 regarding damage to Plaintiff&#039;s rights, a &#039;WHEREFORE&#039; section demanding over $50,000 in damages plus costs and fees, followed by a signature line for Rogers Castor with typed names Bruce L. Castor Jr. and Lance Rogers, along with their firm address and contact details.\" data-attachment-id=\"2297\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-38\/377513889.png\" alt=\"A scanned legal document page showing a &#039;WHEREFORE&#039; clause demanding damages, followed by attorney signatures and contact information for Rogers Castor.\" title=\"Legal document excerpt with wherefore clause and attorney signature block.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Legal document excerpt with wherefore clause and attorney signature block.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows the bottom portion of a civil complaint or legal pleading. It includes numbered point 5 regarding damage to Plaintiff's rights, a 'WHEREFORE' section demanding over $50,000 in damages plus costs and fees, followed by a signature line for Rogers Castor with typed names Bruce L. Castor Jr. and Lance Rogers, along with their firm address and contact details.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-39.png\" data-caption-title=\"Verification statement signed by Stacy Parks Miller on page 37 of a legal document.\" data-caption-desc=\"This is a single-page scan of a legal verification form. The text states that Stacy Parks-Miller, as Plaintiff, verifies the facts are true to the best of her knowledge and belief, subject to penalties under 18 Pa. C.S. \u00a74904. A handwritten signature appears above the typed name &#039;Stacy Parks Miller&#039;.\" data-attachment-id=\"2298\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-39\/1774920508.png\" alt=\"A scanned legal document page titled VERIFICATION with a signature of Stacy Parks Miller and page number 37.\" title=\"Verification statement signed by Stacy Parks Miller on page 37 of a legal document.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Verification statement signed by Stacy Parks Miller on page 37 of a legal document.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">This is a single-page scan of a legal verification form. The text states that Stacy Parks-Miller, as Plaintiff, verifies the facts are true to the best of her knowledge and belief, subject to penalties under 18 Pa. C.S. \u00a74904. A handwritten signature appears above the typed name 'Stacy Parks Miller'.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-40.png\" data-caption-title=\"Title page for Exhibit A.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image displays the text &#039;Exhibit \u201cA\u201d&#039; in bold, black font centered on a plain white background. No other visual elements or content are present.\" data-attachment-id=\"2299\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-40\/1196402541.png\" alt=\"Text reading &#039;Exhibit \u201cA\u201d&#039; centered on a white background.\" title=\"Title page for Exhibit A.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Title page for Exhibit A.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image displays the text 'Exhibit \u201cA\u201d' in bold, black font centered on a plain white background. No other visual elements or content are present.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-41.png\" data-caption-title=\"Scanned page of a grand jury report investigating allegations against Stacy Parks Miller.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows a formal legal document header and introduction from the Thirty-Seventh Statewide Investigating Grand Jury. It details an investigation into possible law violations by Stacy Parks Miller, including forged signatures and misuse of office resources.\" data-attachment-id=\"2300\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-41\/747959773.png\" alt=\"A scanned legal document titled &#039;Grand Jury Report No. 1&#039; from the Thirty-Seventh Statewide Investigating Grand Jury in Allegheny County, Pennsylvania.\" title=\"Scanned page of a grand jury report investigating allegations against Stacy Parks Miller.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Scanned page of a grand jury report investigating allegations against Stacy Parks Miller.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows a formal legal document header and introduction from the Thirty-Seventh Statewide Investigating Grand Jury. It details an investigation into possible law violations by Stacy Parks Miller, including forged signatures and misuse of office resources.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-42.png\" data-caption-title=\"Page 2 of a legal document citing relevant Pennsylvania criminal statutes and legislation.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows a printed page from a legal document, likely part of a civil complaint or brief. It lists three criminal statutes (18 Pa.C.S.A. 4101 Forgery, 4104 Tampering with records or identification, and 3926 Theft of Services) and one relevant legislation section (16 P.S. \u00a7 1405 Misconduct of District Attorney). The text is formatted in standard legal citation style with underlined headings.\" data-attachment-id=\"2301\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-42\/4155572365.png\" alt=\"A scanned legal document page listing Pennsylvania criminal statutes and legislation regarding forgery, tampering with records, theft of services, and misconduct of district attorn\" title=\"Page 2 of a legal document citing relevant Pennsylvania criminal statutes and legislation.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Page 2 of a legal document citing relevant Pennsylvania criminal statutes and legislation.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows a printed page from a legal document, likely part of a civil complaint or brief. It lists three criminal statutes (18 Pa.C.S.A. 4101 Forgery, 4104 Tampering with records or identification, and 3926 Theft of Services) and one relevant legislation section (16 P.S. \u00a7 1405 Misconduct of District Attorney). The text is formatted in standard legal citation style with underlined headings.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-43.png\" data-caption-title=\"Excerpts from Pennsylvania laws concerning district attorney responsibilities and Attorney General prosecution powers.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image displays a printed legal document containing text from Pennsylvania statutes, including sections on district attorneys charged with crimes and the Attorney General&#039;s role in criminal prosecutions. The page includes numbered subsections detailing conditions under which the Attorney General may intervene in cases involving state officials or corrupt organizations.\" data-attachment-id=\"2302\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-43\/3320059846.png\" alt=\"A scanned legal document page showing excerpts from Pennsylvania statutes regarding district attorneys and criminal prosecutions.\" title=\"Excerpts from Pennsylvania laws concerning district attorney responsibilities and Attorney General prosecution powers.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Excerpts from Pennsylvania laws concerning district attorney responsibilities and Attorney General prosecution powers.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image displays a printed legal document containing text from Pennsylvania statutes, including sections on district attorneys charged with crimes and the Attorney General's role in criminal prosecutions. The page includes numbered subsections detailing conditions under which the Attorney General may intervene in cases involving state officials or corrupt organizations.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-44.png\" data-caption-title=\"Page four of a legal document detailing criminal culpability findings involving Stacy Parks Miller.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows a printed legal document with text discussing district attorney procedures, Commonwealth intervention, and specific allegations against Stacy Parks Miller. The visible section includes numbered items (5) through (8), followed by a heading &#039;FACTUAL FINDINGS CRIMINAL CULPABILITY&#039; and introductory paragraphs about her election and office.\" data-attachment-id=\"2303\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-44\/2592861292.png\" alt=\"A scanned legal document page containing numbered paragraphs about criminal proceedings and factual findings regarding Stacy Parks Miller.\" title=\"Page four of a legal document detailing criminal culpability findings involving Stacy Parks Miller.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Page four of a legal document detailing criminal culpability findings involving Stacy Parks Miller.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows a printed legal document with text discussing district attorney procedures, Commonwealth intervention, and specific allegations against Stacy Parks Miller. The visible section includes numbered items (5) through (8), followed by a heading 'FACTUAL FINDINGS CRIMINAL CULPABILITY' and introductory paragraphs about her election and office.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-45.png\" data-caption-title=\"Page 5 of a civil complaint describing an undercover surveillance operation.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows a single page (numbered 5) of a typed legal document discussing a criminal investigation. The text details how DA Parks Miller arranged for an undercover trooper to pose as a spiritual advisor named &#039;Home Cookin&#039; to record conversations with inmate Ryan Richard regarding a murder-for-hire plot against Nathan Boob.\" data-attachment-id=\"2304\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-45\/621033386.png\" alt=\"A scanned page from a legal document detailing a wiretap investigation involving Nathan Boob, Ryan Richard, and DA Parks Miller.\" title=\"Page 5 of a civil complaint describing an undercover surveillance operation.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Page 5 of a civil complaint describing an undercover surveillance operation.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows a single page (numbered 5) of a typed legal document discussing a criminal investigation. The text details how DA Parks Miller arranged for an undercover trooper to pose as a spiritual advisor named 'Home Cookin' to record conversations with inmate Ryan Richard regarding a murder-for-hire plot against Nathan Boob.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-46.png\" data-caption-title=\"Document excerpt detailing allegations of forged bail orders in a Pennsylvania case.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows a single page (numbered 6) from a legal text, likely part of a civil complaint or court filing. It describes a plan to create a fake bail order for Albro, involving DA Parks Miller, Michelle Shutt, and Philip Masorti. The text references testimony about forged signatures and interactions with Judge Ruest.\" data-attachment-id=\"2305\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-46\/4263625466.png\" alt=\"A scanned page from a legal document discussing a fake bail order plan involving DA Parks Miller and Judge Ruest.\" title=\"Document excerpt detailing allegations of forged bail orders in a Pennsylvania case.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Document excerpt detailing allegations of forged bail orders in a Pennsylvania case.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows a single page (numbered 6) from a legal text, likely part of a civil complaint or court filing. It describes a plan to create a fake bail order for Albro, involving DA Parks Miller, Michelle Shutt, and Philip Masorti. The text references testimony about forged signatures and interactions with Judge Ruest.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-47.png\" data-caption-title=\"Page of a civil complaint detailing witness testimonies on signature authenticity and legal procedures.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows a single page from a typed legal document with numbered paragraphs describing witness statements. The text discusses testimony regarding fake bail orders, consensual recordings, and forensic handwriting analysis by Mr. Detwiler comparing signatures of Pamela A. Ruest.\" data-attachment-id=\"2306\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-47\/3430208945.png\" alt=\"A scanned page from a legal document discussing testimony about signatures, bail orders, and forensic document examination.\" title=\"Page of a civil complaint detailing witness testimonies on signature authenticity and legal procedures.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Page of a civil complaint detailing witness testimonies on signature authenticity and legal procedures.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows a single page from a typed legal document with numbered paragraphs describing witness statements. The text discusses testimony regarding fake bail orders, consensual recordings, and forensic handwriting analysis by Mr. Detwiler comparing signatures of Pamela A. Ruest.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-48.png\" data-caption-title=\"Page 8 of a civil complaint detailing forensic analysis of signatures and employment-related claims.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows a single page (numbered 8) from a legal document containing text about signature authentication, peer review by Gus Lesnevich, and testimony regarding campaign work for DA Parks Miller. The visible text includes calculations of costs related to copying documents and notary services.\" data-attachment-id=\"2307\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-48\/1090401710.png\" alt=\"A scanned page from a legal document discussing signature evaluation, peer review by Gus Lesnevich, and testimony about campaign work for DA Parks Miller.\" title=\"Page 8 of a civil complaint detailing forensic analysis of signatures and employment-related claims.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Page 8 of a civil complaint detailing forensic analysis of signatures and employment-related claims.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows a single page (numbered 8) from a legal document containing text about signature authentication, peer review by Gus Lesnevich, and testimony regarding campaign work for DA Parks Miller. The visible text includes calculations of costs related to copying documents and notary services.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-49.png\" data-caption-title=\"Scanned text page detailing legal proceedings under the Commonwealth Attorneys Act involving Stacy Parks Miller.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows a single page of a typed legal document with visible text referencing the Commonwealth Attorneys Act, Stacy Parks Miller, and the Bellefonte Police. The page includes numbered sections discussing statutory requirements for complaints and attorney appointments.\" data-attachment-id=\"2308\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-49\/1068855603.png\" alt=\"A scanned page from a legal document discussing the Commonwealth Attorneys Act, mentioning Stacy Parks Miller and Bellefonte Police.\" title=\"Scanned text page detailing legal proceedings under the Commonwealth Attorneys Act involving Stacy Parks Miller.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Scanned text page detailing legal proceedings under the Commonwealth Attorneys Act involving Stacy Parks Miller.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows a single page of a typed legal document with visible text referencing the Commonwealth Attorneys Act, Stacy Parks Miller, and the Bellefonte Police. The page includes numbered sections discussing statutory requirements for complaints and attorney appointments.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-50.png\" data-caption-title=\"Page 10 of a legal document outlining case findings and recommendations for statutory clarification.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows a printed page, numbered 10 at the bottom, containing text about legal case findings and recommendations. It discusses confusion between statutes and notes that evidence does not support charging Stacy Parks Miller with forgery or tampering. The document recommends legislative clarification regarding the interplay of existing statutes.\" data-attachment-id=\"2309\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-50\/1647021288.png\" alt=\"A scanned page from a legal document discussing case findings and recommendations regarding statutory clarification.\" title=\"Page 10 of a legal document outlining case findings and recommendations for statutory clarification.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Page 10 of a legal document outlining case findings and recommendations for statutory clarification.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows a printed page, numbered 10 at the bottom, containing text about legal case findings and recommendations. It discusses confusion between statutes and notes that evidence does not support charging Stacy Parks Miller with forgery or tampering. The document recommends legislative clarification regarding the interplay of existing statutes.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-51.png\" data-caption-title=\"A formal legal response from Centre County District Attorney Stacy Parks Miller regarding allegations in a grand jury report.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows a single-page scanned document, likely from a WordPress Media Library, containing text about legal proceedings involving the Thirty-Seventh Statewide Investigating Grand Jury and Centre County. The document includes references to campaign activities, election guides, and notary services performed by District Attorney Stacy Parks Miller.\" data-attachment-id=\"2310\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-51\/1775413594.png\" alt=\"A scanned legal document titled &#039;Response of Centre County District Attorney Stacy Parks Miller to the Report of the Thirty-Seventh Statewide Investigating Grand Jury&#039;.\" title=\"A formal legal response from Centre County District Attorney Stacy Parks Miller regarding allegations in a grand jury report.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">A formal legal response from Centre County District Attorney Stacy Parks Miller regarding allegations in a grand jury report.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows a single-page scanned document, likely from a WordPress Media Library, containing text about legal proceedings involving the Thirty-Seventh Statewide Investigating Grand Jury and Centre County. The document includes references to campaign activities, election guides, and notary services performed by District Attorney Stacy Parks Miller.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-52.png\" data-caption-title=\"A letter from District Attorney Stacy Parks Miller addressing concerns about her public appearances and testimony credibility.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows a scanned page of a formal legal letter addressed to a Grand Jury. The text discusses Ms. Shutt&#039;s claims regarding DA Parks Miller&#039;s calendar and campaign activities, as well as testimony about a bail reduction order. It is signed by Stacy Parks Miller, District Attorney of Centre County, Pennsylvania.\" data-attachment-id=\"2311\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-52\/3002555402.png\" alt=\"A typed legal document page with a signature at the bottom, discussing calendar scheduling and campaign activities.\" title=\"A letter from District Attorney Stacy Parks Miller addressing concerns about her public appearances and testimony credibility.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">A letter from District Attorney Stacy Parks Miller addressing concerns about her public appearances and testimony credibility.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows a scanned page of a formal legal letter addressed to a Grand Jury. The text discusses Ms. Shutt's claims regarding DA Parks Miller's calendar and campaign activities, as well as testimony about a bail reduction order. It is signed by Stacy Parks Miller, District Attorney of Centre County, Pennsylvania.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-53.png\" data-caption-title=\"Legal correspondence from Caputo &amp;amp; Mariotti addressing objections to a statewide investigating grand jury report.\" data-caption-desc=\"This is a scanned letterhead document from the law firm Caputo &amp;amp; Mariotti, P.C., dated July 23, 2015. It contains typed text outlining objections to a proposed report concerning Robert Ruggiero and Chief Shawn Weaver, referencing Commonwealth Attorney Fact and police department assignments.\" data-attachment-id=\"2312\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-53\/2158119745.png\" alt=\"A scanned legal letter from Caputo &amp; Mariotti, P.C., dated July 23, 2015, addressed to Simquita Bridges of the Office of Attorney General in Pittsburgh, PA, regarding objections to\" title=\"Legal correspondence from Caputo &amp; Mariotti addressing objections to a statewide investigating grand jury report.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Legal correspondence from Caputo &amp; Mariotti addressing objections to a statewide investigating grand jury report.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">This is a scanned letterhead document from the law firm Caputo &amp; Mariotti, P.C., dated July 23, 2015. It contains typed text outlining objections to a proposed report concerning Robert Ruggiero and Chief Shawn Weaver, referencing Commonwealth Attorney Fact and police department assignments.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-54.png\" data-caption-title=\"Legal correspondence from Abom &amp;amp; Kutulakis LLP concerning a Grand Jury investigation.\" data-caption-desc=\"This is a scanned document of a formal letter on the letterhead of Abom &amp;amp; Kutulakis, Attorneys at Law. The letter, dated July 21, 2015, is addressed to Simquita Bridges, Senior Deputy Attorney General, in Pittsburgh, PA. It concerns a Grand Jury Investigation and references Centre County Commissioners Steven Dersham and Chris Exarchos.\" data-attachment-id=\"2313\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-54\/3754799339.png\" alt=\"A scanned legal letter from Abom &amp; Kutulakis LLP dated July 21, 2015, addressed to Simquita Bridges regarding a Grand Jury Investigation.\" title=\"Legal correspondence from Abom &amp; Kutulakis LLP concerning a Grand Jury investigation.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Legal correspondence from Abom &amp; Kutulakis LLP concerning a Grand Jury investigation.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">This is a scanned document of a formal letter on the letterhead of Abom &amp; Kutulakis, Attorneys at Law. The letter, dated July 21, 2015, is addressed to Simquita Bridges, Senior Deputy Attorney General, in Pittsburgh, PA. It concerns a Grand Jury Investigation and references Centre County Commissioners Steven Dersham and Chris Exarchos.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-55.png\" data-caption-title=\"Title page for Exhibit B.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows a single white document page with the centered, bold text &#039;Exhibit \u201cB\u201d&#039;. There are no other visible elements, graphics, or content on the page. The filename suggests this may be part of a civil complaint document set.\" data-attachment-id=\"2314\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-55\/1614965549.png\" alt=\"A white page with the text &#039;Exhibit \u201cB\u201d&#039; centered in bold black font.\" title=\"Title page for Exhibit B.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Title page for Exhibit B.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows a single white document page with the centered, bold text 'Exhibit \u201cB\u201d'. There are no other visible elements, graphics, or content on the page. The filename suggests this may be part of a civil complaint document set.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-56.png\" data-caption-title=\"A formal letter from Rogers Castor addressing Centre County Commissioners about a special prosecutor appointment.\" data-caption-desc=\"This is a scanned document of a formal letter dated January 27, 2015, from Bruce L. Castor Jr. on Rogers Castor letterhead. The letter is addressed to Hon. Chris Exarchos, Hon. Steve Dershem, and Hon. Michael Pipe at Centre County Court House in Bellefonte, PA. It discusses District Attorney Stacy Parks Miller and references Pennsylvania statutes 16 P.S. \u00a71406 and 71 P.S. \u00a7732-101 et seq.\" data-attachment-id=\"2315\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-56\/3144130173.png\" alt=\"A typed letter on Rogers Castor letterhead addressed to Centre County Commissioners regarding District Attorney Stacy Parks Miller and legal statutes.\" title=\"A formal letter from Rogers Castor addressing Centre County Commissioners about a special prosecutor appointment.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">A formal letter from Rogers Castor addressing Centre County Commissioners about a special prosecutor appointment.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">This is a scanned document of a formal letter dated January 27, 2015, from Bruce L. Castor Jr. on Rogers Castor letterhead. The letter is addressed to Hon. Chris Exarchos, Hon. Steve Dershem, and Hon. Michael Pipe at Centre County Court House in Bellefonte, PA. It discusses District Attorney Stacy Parks Miller and references Pennsylvania statutes 16 P.S. \u00a71406 and 71 P.S. \u00a7732-101 et seq.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-57.png\" data-caption-title=\"A formal legal letter signed by Bruce L. Castor, Jr., regarding jurisdiction over a bail inquiry.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows a single-page scanned document containing legal text referencing Pennsylvania court rulings and statutes. It includes a typed signature block with &#039;Bruce L. Castor, Jr.&#039; and a list of recipients in the cc section.\" data-attachment-id=\"2316\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-57\/2301790518.png\" alt=\"A scanned legal letter on white paper with typed text, a signature, and a cc list at the bottom.\" title=\"A formal legal letter signed by Bruce L. Castor, Jr., regarding jurisdiction over a bail inquiry.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">A formal legal letter signed by Bruce L. Castor, Jr., regarding jurisdiction over a bail inquiry.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows a single-page scanned document containing legal text referencing Pennsylvania court rulings and statutes. It includes a typed signature block with 'Bruce L. Castor, Jr.' and a list of recipients in the cc section.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-58.png\" data-caption-title=\"Title page for Exhibit C.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows a single white document page with the centered text &#039;Exhibit \u201cC\u201d&#039; printed in bold black serif font. No other content, graphics, or people are visible on the page.\" data-attachment-id=\"2317\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-58\/95971625.png\" alt=\"A white page with the text &#039;Exhibit \u201cC\u201d&#039; centered in black serif font.\" title=\"Title page for Exhibit C.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Title page for Exhibit C.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows a single white document page with the centered text 'Exhibit \u201cC\u201d' printed in bold black serif font. No other content, graphics, or people are visible on the page.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-59.png\" data-caption-title=\"A formal letter regarding legal counsel and defamation issues addressed to a solicitor.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows a scanned letterhead document from Rogers Castor dated August 4, 2015, addressed to Louis T. Glantz, Solicitor of Centre County, PA. The text discusses potential criminal investigation, defamation claims, and requests for legal counsel among county officials.\" data-attachment-id=\"2318\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-59\/2062757300.png\" alt=\"A formal letter from Rogers Castor to Louis T. Glantz dated August 4, 2015, discussing legal counsel and defamation concerns.\" title=\"A formal letter regarding legal counsel and defamation issues addressed to a solicitor.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">A formal letter regarding legal counsel and defamation issues addressed to a solicitor.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows a scanned letterhead document from Rogers Castor dated August 4, 2015, addressed to Louis T. Glantz, Solicitor of Centre County, PA. The text discusses potential criminal investigation, defamation claims, and requests for legal counsel among county officials.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-60.png\" data-caption-title=\"Typed letter signed by Bruce L. Castor, Jr., addressing concerns over defamatory remarks and reputational damage.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows the bottom portion of a typed letter on white paper, ending with the closing &#039;Very truly yours,&#039; followed by a handwritten signature and the typed name &#039;Bruce L. Castor, Jr.&#039; The visible text requests that members of the Centre County Administration avoid making derogatory remarks about DA Parks Miller to mitigate damage to county taxpayers.\" data-attachment-id=\"2319\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerCivilComplaint-60\/161216745.png\" alt=\"A typed letter ending with a signature block for Bruce L. Castor, Jr., requesting caution from county officials regarding remarks about DA Parks Miller.\" title=\"Typed letter signed by Bruce L. Castor, Jr., addressing concerns over defamatory remarks and reputational damage.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Typed letter signed by Bruce L. Castor, Jr., addressing concerns over defamatory remarks and reputational damage.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows the bottom portion of a typed letter on white paper, ending with the closing 'Very truly yours,' followed by a handwritten signature and the typed name 'Bruce L. Castor, Jr.' The visible text requests that members of the Centre County Administration avoid making derogatory remarks about DA Parks Miller to mitigate damage to county taxpayers.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div>\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<div class=\"fiv-ctrls\">\n\t\t\t<button type=\"button\" class=\"fiv-prev\" title=\"Prev\"><span>Prev<\/span><\/button>\n\t\t\t<label class=\"fiv-count\"><span class=\"fiv-count-current\">1<\/span>of<span class=\"fiv-count-total\">60<\/span><\/label>\n\t\t\t<button type=\"button\" class=\"fiv-next\" title=\"Next\"><span>Next<\/span><\/button>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n<div style=\"display: flex; float: right; width: 400px; padding-left: 10pt;\">\r\n<style type=\"text\/css\">\n#foogallery-gallery-2414 .fg-image { width: 320px; }<\/style>\n\t\t\t<div class=\"foogallery foogallery-container foogallery-image-viewer foogallery-link-image foogallery-lightbox-foobox fg-center fg-image-viewer fg-ready fg-dark fg-border-thin fg-shadow-outline fg-loading-default fg-loaded-fade-in fg-caption-hover fg-hover-fade fg-hover-zoom fg-no-js\" id=\"foogallery-gallery-2414\" data-foogallery=\"{&quot;item&quot;:{&quot;showCaptionTitle&quot;:true,&quot;showCaptionDescription&quot;:true},&quot;lazy&quot;:true,&quot;src&quot;:&quot;src&quot;,&quot;srcset&quot;:&quot;srcset&quot;,&quot;template&quot;:{&quot;loop&quot;:true,&quot;autoplay&quot;:0}}\" style=\"--fg-title-line-clamp: 0; --fg-description-line-clamp: 0;\" >\n\t<div class=\"fiv-inner\">\n\t\t<div class=\"fiv-inner-container\">\n\t\t\t<div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-01.png\" data-caption-title=\"Legal motion filed by District Attorney Stacy Parks Miller against the County of Centre.\" data-caption-desc=\"This is a one-page scanned court document from the Court of Common Pleas in Centre County, Pennsylvania. It outlines a motion for contempt and sanctions filed by DA Stacy Parks Miller regarding alleged violations of Right to Know Law orders by the County of Centre between November 2014 and May 2015.\" data-attachment-id=\"2320\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-01\/3041774560.png\" alt=\"A scanned legal document titled Motion for Contempt and Sanctions from the Court of Common Pleas Centre County, Pennsylvania.\" title=\"Legal motion filed by District Attorney Stacy Parks Miller against the County of Centre.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Legal motion filed by District Attorney Stacy Parks Miller against the County of Centre.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">This is a one-page scanned court document from the Court of Common Pleas in Centre County, Pennsylvania. It outlines a motion for contempt and sanctions filed by DA Stacy Parks Miller regarding alleged violations of Right to Know Law orders by the County of Centre between November 2014 and May 2015.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-02.png\" data-caption-title=\"Page 2 of a legal document detailing the handling of unlawfully released records by attorneys and the judiciary.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows a printed page (numbered 2) from a legal text discussing unlawful record releases to Attorney Bernard Cantorna, motions filed by attorneys, and efforts by defense lawyers. The footer indicates it was printed from Centre County Online Access on 6\/10\/2015.\" data-attachment-id=\"2321\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-02\/2193878942.png\" alt=\"A scanned page from a legal document discussing unlawfully released records, attorneys, and judicial contacts in Pennsylvania.\" title=\"Page 2 of a legal document detailing the handling of unlawfully released records by attorneys and the judiciary.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Page 2 of a legal document detailing the handling of unlawfully released records by attorneys and the judiciary.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows a printed page (numbered 2) from a legal text discussing unlawful record releases to Attorney Bernard Cantorna, motions filed by attorneys, and efforts by defense lawyers. The footer indicates it was printed from Centre County Online Access on 6\/10\/2015.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-03.png\" data-caption-title=\"Page 3 of a legal opinion regarding Centre County&#039;s response to right-to-know law requests.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows a printed legal document, likely from a court case involving the Centre County. It includes text referencing cases Grine v. County of Centre and Gillette-Walker v. County of Centre, discussing injunctions against making responses to public records requests. The page contains footnotes citing specific case numbers and mentions the Prothonotary and District Court Administrator.\" data-attachment-id=\"2322\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-03\/1578864102.png\" alt=\"A scanned legal document page with numbered paragraphs discussing court rulings on public records requests and judicial transparency.\" title=\"Page 3 of a legal opinion regarding Centre County&#039;s response to right-to-know law requests.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Page 3 of a legal opinion regarding Centre County's response to right-to-know law requests.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows a printed legal document, likely from a court case involving the Centre County. It includes text referencing cases Grine v. County of Centre and Gillette-Walker v. County of Centre, discussing injunctions against making responses to public records requests. The page contains footnotes citing specific case numbers and mentions the Prothonotary and District Court Administrator.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-04.png\" data-caption-title=\"Page 4 of a legal document detailing court rulings regarding records and policy violations.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows a printed legal document page with numbered paragraphs from 6 to 11. The text discusses court decisions concerning the Commonwealth, County policies, RTKL requests, and judicial records. A footer indicates it was printed from Centre County Online Access on 6\/10\/2015.\" data-attachment-id=\"2323\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-04\/3990857570.png\" alt=\"A scanned legal document page numbered 4, containing paragraphs 6 through 11 discussing court rulings on records and policy violations.\" title=\"Page 4 of a legal document detailing court rulings regarding records and policy violations.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Page 4 of a legal document detailing court rulings regarding records and policy violations.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows a printed legal document page with numbered paragraphs from 6 to 11. The text discusses court decisions concerning the Commonwealth, County policies, RTKL requests, and judicial records. A footer indicates it was printed from Centre County Online Access on 6\/10\/2015.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-05.png\" data-caption-title=\"Page 5 of a legal document detailing a May 13, 2015 court order concerning the County of Centre.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows a printed legal document page containing paragraphs numbered 12 through 16. It includes text about a hearing on May 13, 2015, and an excerpt from a court order enjoining the County of Centre from making responses to requests under the Pennsylvania Right-to-Know law.\" data-attachment-id=\"2324\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-05\/3096461741.png\" alt=\"A scanned legal document page with numbered paragraphs discussing a court order regarding the County of Centre and Right-to-Know law.\" title=\"Page 5 of a legal document detailing a May 13, 2015 court order concerning the County of Centre.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Page 5 of a legal document detailing a May 13, 2015 court order concerning the County of Centre.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows a printed legal document page containing paragraphs numbered 12 through 16. It includes text about a hearing on May 13, 2015, and an excerpt from a court order enjoining the County of Centre from making responses to requests under the Pennsylvania Right-to-Know law.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-06.png\" data-caption-title=\"A legal document excerpt detailing violations of court orders by the County regarding record access and response protocols.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows a printed legal document page containing text about procedural violations by the County. It references specific dates (May 8, 2015; May 13, 2015), individuals (Dave Crowley, Judge Kurtz), and exhibits (Exhibit 4, Exhibit 5). The footer indicates it was printed from Centre County Online Access on 6\/10\/2015.\" data-attachment-id=\"2325\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-06\/2401134035.png\" alt=\"A scanned legal document page with numbered paragraphs discussing court orders, county procedures, and public defender requests.\" title=\"A legal document excerpt detailing violations of court orders by the County regarding record access and response protocols.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">A legal document excerpt detailing violations of court orders by the County regarding record access and response protocols.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows a printed legal document page containing text about procedural violations by the County. It references specific dates (May 8, 2015; May 13, 2015), individuals (Dave Crowley, Judge Kurtz), and exhibits (Exhibit 4, Exhibit 5). The footer indicates it was printed from Centre County Online Access on 6\/10\/2015.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-07.png\" data-caption-title=\"Page 7 of a legal filing regarding court orders and open records requests.\" data-caption-desc=\"This is a scanned page from a legal document, likely part of a brief or motion. It contains numbered paragraphs discussing the County&#039;s actions, the Office of Open Records (OOR), and RTKL (Right to Know Law) requests. The text references the Jerry Sandusky trial and argues that judicial records are not subject to OOR jurisdiction.\" data-attachment-id=\"2326\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-07\/1405487019.png\" alt=\"A scanned legal document page with numbered paragraphs discussing court orders, the Office of Open Records (OOR), and RTKL requests.\" title=\"Page 7 of a legal filing regarding court orders and open records requests.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Page 7 of a legal filing regarding court orders and open records requests.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">This is a scanned page from a legal document, likely part of a brief or motion. It contains numbered paragraphs discussing the County's actions, the Office of Open Records (OOR), and RTKL (Right to Know Law) requests. The text references the Jerry Sandusky trial and argues that judicial records are not subject to OOR jurisdiction.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-08.png\" data-caption-title=\"Page 8 of a legal document detailing allegations of indirect criminal contempt against the County.\" data-caption-desc=\"This is a scanned page from a legal filing, showing paragraphs 21 through 24. The text discusses elements required to establish indirect criminal contempt and alleges that the County has violated court orders regarding RTKL requests by refusing to direct them to the District Attorney. A citation to Commonwealth v. Brumbaugh appears in paragraph 21.\" data-attachment-id=\"2327\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-08\/870790810.png\" alt=\"A scanned legal document page with numbered paragraphs discussing criminal contempt, court orders, and county violations.\" title=\"Page 8 of a legal document detailing allegations of indirect criminal contempt against the County.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Page 8 of a legal document detailing allegations of indirect criminal contempt against the County.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">This is a scanned page from a legal filing, showing paragraphs 21 through 24. The text discusses elements required to establish indirect criminal contempt and alleges that the County has violated court orders regarding RTKL requests by refusing to direct them to the District Attorney. A citation to Commonwealth v. Brumbaugh appears in paragraph 21.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-09.png\" data-caption-title=\"Page 9 of a legal document detailing claims about judicial records and county policy.\" data-caption-desc=\"This is a scanned page from a legal filing containing numbered paragraphs (25\u201330) that assert facts regarding telephone records as judicial records, the District Attorney\u2019s role in the Unified Judicial System, and court-ordered procedures for handling requests under RTKL. The text references former President Judge Brown and mentions dual appeals in OOR and Commonwealth Court.\" data-attachment-id=\"2328\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-09\/2935414650.png\" alt=\"A scanned legal document page with numbered paragraphs discussing judicial records, the District Attorney, and court procedures.\" title=\"Page 9 of a legal document detailing claims about judicial records and county policy.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Page 9 of a legal document detailing claims about judicial records and county policy.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">This is a scanned page from a legal filing containing numbered paragraphs (25\u201330) that assert facts regarding telephone records as judicial records, the District Attorney\u2019s role in the Unified Judicial System, and court-ordered procedures for handling requests under RTKL. The text references former President Judge Brown and mentions dual appeals in OOR and Commonwealth Court.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-10.png\" data-caption-title=\"Page 10 of a legal document detailing allegations against the County regarding judicial record handling.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows a printed page from a legal filing or opinion, with numbered paragraphs (31\u201334) and subsections (a, b). It references a May 7, 2014 ruling, press tour statements by the Commissioner\u2019s office, and includes URLs to State College news articles. The footer indicates it was printed on 6\/10\/2015 via Centre County Online Access.\" data-attachment-id=\"2329\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-10\/532935567.png\" alt=\"A scanned legal document page numbered 10 containing paragraphs 31\u201334 and subsections a and b discussing court rulings, county violations, and public statements.\" title=\"Page 10 of a legal document detailing allegations against the County regarding judicial record handling.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Page 10 of a legal document detailing allegations against the County regarding judicial record handling.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows a printed page from a legal filing or opinion, with numbered paragraphs (31\u201334) and subsections (a, b). It references a May 7, 2014 ruling, press tour statements by the Commissioner\u2019s office, and includes URLs to State College news articles. The footer indicates it was printed on 6\/10\/2015 via Centre County Online Access.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-11.png\" data-caption-title=\"Page 11 of a legal document detailing discussions on county cell phone usage and policy changes.\" data-caption-desc=\"This is a scanned page (numbered 11) from a legal document or court transcript. The text discusses various points labeled c through h, mentioning commissioners Chris Exarchos and Steve Dershem, the Right to Know Law, and issues regarding county cell phones and privacy policies.\" data-attachment-id=\"2330\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-11\/741421433.png\" alt=\"A scanned page from a legal document discussing county cell phone policies, Right to Know law, and commissioner Exarchos&#039;s comments.\" title=\"Page 11 of a legal document detailing discussions on county cell phone usage and policy changes.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Page 11 of a legal document detailing discussions on county cell phone usage and policy changes.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">This is a scanned page (numbered 11) from a legal document or court transcript. The text discusses various points labeled c through h, mentioning commissioners Chris Exarchos and Steve Dershem, the Right to Know Law, and issues regarding county cell phones and privacy policies.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-12.png\" data-caption-title=\"Page 12 of a legal document regarding Centre County&#039;s refusal to accept a court ruling.\" data-caption-desc=\"This is a printed page from a legal filing, likely part of an opinion or brief. It contains numbered paragraphs (i, 35, 36) discussing the County&#039;s refusal to accept a court ruling that records are &#039;judicial&#039;. The text mentions the Commonwealth and District Attorney requesting the Court find Centre County in Indirect Criminal Contempt.\" data-attachment-id=\"2331\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-12\/465507591.png\" alt=\"A scanned legal document page with numbered paragraphs discussing court rulings and contempt of court, ending with a &#039;WHEREFORE&#039; section requesting findings.\" title=\"Page 12 of a legal document regarding Centre County&#039;s refusal to accept a court ruling.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Page 12 of a legal document regarding Centre County's refusal to accept a court ruling.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">This is a printed page from a legal filing, likely part of an opinion or brief. It contains numbered paragraphs (i, 35, 36) discussing the County's refusal to accept a court ruling that records are 'judicial'. The text mentions the Commonwealth and District Attorney requesting the Court find Centre County in Indirect Criminal Contempt.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-13.png\" data-caption-title=\"Page 13 of a legal document signed by Bruce L. Castor Jr., counsel to District Attorney Stacy Parks Miller.\" data-caption-desc=\"This is a scanned page from a legal document, ending with the phrase &#039;upon proof beyond a reasonable doubt, such other criminal sanctions as the Court might believe appropriate.&#039; Below that is a typed closing &#039;Respectfully Submitted,&#039; followed by a handwritten signature and printed name Bruce L. Castor Jr., Counsel to District Attorney Stacy Parks Miller. The page number 13 appears at the bottom center, and a footer indicates it was printed from Centre County Online Access on 6\/10\/2015.\" data-attachment-id=\"2332\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-13\/3345446783.png\" alt=\"Document page showing legal text about criminal sanctions, a signature block with Bruce L. Castor Jr., and footer indicating Centre County Online Access.\" title=\"Page 13 of a legal document signed by Bruce L. Castor Jr., counsel to District Attorney Stacy Parks Miller.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Page 13 of a legal document signed by Bruce L. Castor Jr., counsel to District Attorney Stacy Parks Miller.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">This is a scanned page from a legal document, ending with the phrase 'upon proof beyond a reasonable doubt, such other criminal sanctions as the Court might believe appropriate.' Below that is a typed closing 'Respectfully Submitted,' followed by a handwritten signature and printed name Bruce L. Castor Jr., Counsel to District Attorney Stacy Parks Miller. The page number 13 appears at the bottom center, and a footer indicates it was printed from Centre County Online Access on 6\/10\/2015.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-14.png\" data-caption-title=\"Certificate of Service confirming U.S. Mail delivery to two attorneys on June 9, 2015.\" data-caption-desc=\"This is a scanned page from a legal document titled &#039;CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE&#039;, certifying that service was made by U.S. Mail to Mary Lou Maierhofer and Craig J. Staudenmaier, Esquire, representing Centre County. The document includes typed addresses, a handwritten signature of Bruce L. Castor, Jr., and the date June 9, 2015.\" data-attachment-id=\"2333\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-14\/1956863483.png\" alt=\"A scanned legal document titled &#039;CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE&#039; showing two attorneys&#039; addresses and a signature dated June 9, 2015.\" title=\"Certificate of Service confirming U.S. Mail delivery to two attorneys on June 9, 2015.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Certificate of Service confirming U.S. Mail delivery to two attorneys on June 9, 2015.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">This is a scanned page from a legal document titled 'CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE', certifying that service was made by U.S. Mail to Mary Lou Maierhofer and Craig J. Staudenmaier, Esquire, representing Centre County. The document includes typed addresses, a handwritten signature of Bruce L. Castor, Jr., and the date June 9, 2015.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-15.png\" data-caption-title=\"Exhibit 1 document page.\" data-caption-desc=\"This is a scanned or printed document page titled &#039;EXHIBIT 1&#039; in bold, centered, uppercase serif typeface. At the bottom left, small text indicates it was printed from Centre County Online Access on 6\/10\/2015 at 4:12:08 PM.\" data-attachment-id=\"2334\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-15\/569162548.png\" alt=\"A white document page with the text &#039;EXHIBIT 1&#039; centered in large black serif font and a footer note about printing from Centre County Online Access.\" title=\"Exhibit 1 document page.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Exhibit 1 document page.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">This is a scanned or printed document page titled 'EXHIBIT 1' in bold, centered, uppercase serif typeface. At the bottom left, small text indicates it was printed from Centre County Online Access on 6\/10\/2015 at 4:12:08 PM.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-16.png\" data-caption-title=\"Judge urges DA and County to settle dispute out of court.\" data-caption-desc=\"This is a scanned article from State College, PA dated May 13, 2015, reporting on Judge Stewart Kurtz\u2019s suggestion that Centre County officials resolve their legal dispute through mediation rather than litigation. The document includes an exhibit label and a grayscale photograph of two individuals, but no oversized bank check or ceremonial financial instrument is visible.\" data-attachment-id=\"2335\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-16\/375562058.png\" alt=\"A black-and-white photo of two people standing together; one appears to be a man in a suit and the other a woman with long hair.\" title=\"Judge urges DA and County to settle dispute out of court.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Judge urges DA and County to settle dispute out of court.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">This is a scanned article from State College, PA dated May 13, 2015, reporting on Judge Stewart Kurtz\u2019s suggestion that Centre County officials resolve their legal dispute through mediation rather than litigation. The document includes an exhibit label and a grayscale photograph of two individuals, but no oversized bank check or ceremonial financial instrument is visible.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-17.png\" data-caption-title=\"News report on legal conflicts involving judges, prosecutors, and defense attorneys regarding record releases.\" data-caption-desc=\"This is a scanned page (Page 2 of 3) from a State College newspaper article dated 6\/8\/2015. The text discusses a lawsuit where Judge Parks Miller has dismissed some law firms but threatens to drag others back in due to their use of her phone records. It also mentions other judges suing the county over similar issues.\" data-attachment-id=\"2336\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-17\/3401252146.png\" alt=\"A printed page from a news article discussing legal disputes over county records and phone data in Centre County, PA.\" title=\"News report on legal conflicts involving judges, prosecutors, and defense attorneys regarding record releases.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">News report on legal conflicts involving judges, prosecutors, and defense attorneys regarding record releases.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">This is a scanned page (Page 2 of 3) from a State College newspaper article dated 6\/8\/2015. The text discusses a lawsuit where Judge Parks Miller has dismissed some law firms but threatens to drag others back in due to their use of her phone records. It also mentions other judges suing the county over similar issues.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-18.png\" data-caption-title=\"Printed article page from StateCollege.com featuring local news headlines and copyright notice.\" data-caption-desc=\"This is a scanned printout of the third page (of three) from StateCollege.com, dated June 8, 2015. It displays three underlined headlines: one about a judge urging DA and county to settle a dispute out of court; another titled &#039;Penn State Football: Smith An Outsider No More On Franklin&#039;s Staff&#039;; and a third about business owners recognized as best in Western Pennsylvania. A disclaimer and URL are visible below the headlines.\" data-attachment-id=\"2337\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-18\/2862337027.png\" alt=\"A printed page from StateCollege.com showing headlines about local news, including a judge urging settlement and Penn State football updates.\" title=\"Printed article page from StateCollege.com featuring local news headlines and copyright notice.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Printed article page from StateCollege.com featuring local news headlines and copyright notice.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">This is a scanned printout of the third page (of three) from StateCollege.com, dated June 8, 2015. It displays three underlined headlines: one about a judge urging DA and county to settle a dispute out of court; another titled 'Penn State Football: Smith An Outsider No More On Franklin's Staff'; and a third about business owners recognized as best in Western Pennsylvania. A disclaimer and URL are visible below the headlines.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-19.png\" data-caption-title=\"Exhibit 2 document page.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows a single-page document titled &#039;EXHIBIT 2&#039; in bold, centered, uppercase serif typeface. At the bottom left, small text indicates it was printed from Centre County Online Access on 6\/10\/2015 at 4:12:08 PM.\" data-attachment-id=\"2338\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-19\/931800547.png\" alt=\"A white document page with the text &#039;EXHIBIT 2&#039; centered in large black serif font and a footer note about printing from Centre County Online Access.\" title=\"Exhibit 2 document page.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Exhibit 2 document page.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows a single-page document titled 'EXHIBIT 2' in bold, centered, uppercase serif typeface. At the bottom left, small text indicates it was printed from Centre County Online Access on 6\/10\/2015 at 4:12:08 PM.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-20.png\" data-caption-title=\"Legal article discussing Centre County\u2019s appeal of judicial records request injunctions.\" data-caption-desc=\"This is a screenshot or printout of a legal news article titled &#039;Centre County to Appeal Injunctions on Records Requests&#039; from The Legal Intelligencer, dated May 26, 2015. It reports that three preliminary injunctions have been issued in Centre County preventing the government from responding to judicial records requests involving judges and district attorneys.\" data-attachment-id=\"2339\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-20\/2823365008.png\" alt=\"A printed legal article from The Legal Intelligencer about Centre County appealing injunctions on records requests, dated May 26, 2015.\" title=\"Legal article discussing Centre County\u2019s appeal of judicial records request injunctions.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Legal article discussing Centre County\u2019s appeal of judicial records request injunctions.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">This is a screenshot or printout of a legal news article titled 'Centre County to Appeal Injunctions on Records Requests' from The Legal Intelligencer, dated May 26, 2015. It reports that three preliminary injunctions have been issued in Centre County preventing the government from responding to judicial records requests involving judges and district attorneys.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-21.png\" data-caption-title=\"Page from a legal article about Centre County appeal injunctions on records requests.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows a scanned page of text titled &#039;Centre County to Appeal Injunctions on Records Requests | The Legal Intelligencer&#039;, dated 6\/8\/2015. It contains multiple paragraphs discussing court orders, legal arguments regarding public records and privacy, and statements from attorneys representing various parties.\" data-attachment-id=\"2340\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-21\/155814200.png\" alt=\"A printed legal document page discussing court rulings on records requests and injunctions.\" title=\"Page from a legal article about Centre County appeal injunctions on records requests.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Page from a legal article about Centre County appeal injunctions on records requests.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows a scanned page of text titled 'Centre County to Appeal Injunctions on Records Requests | The Legal Intelligencer', dated 6\/8\/2015. It contains multiple paragraphs discussing court orders, legal arguments regarding public records and privacy, and statements from attorneys representing various parties.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-22.png\" data-caption-title=\"Legal article excerpt on record requests and judicial conduct investigations.\" data-caption-desc=\"This is a scanned page from The Legal Intelligencer dated 6\/8\/2015, titled &#039;Centre County to Appeal Injunctions on Records Requests&#039;. It discusses RTKL (Right-to-Know Law) requests involving Grine, Walker, Parks Miller, and Judge Bradley Lunsford. The text includes quotes from Louis Glantz, Castor, Colonna, Lizzy McLellan, and Max Mitchell regarding transparency, propriety of communication, and ongoing investigations by the Office of the Attorney General and Judicial Conduct Board.\" data-attachment-id=\"2341\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-22\/1053273414.png\" alt=\"A printed legal article page discussing RTKL requests, Centre County records, and legal proceedings involving Grine, Walker, Parks Miller, and Judge Bradley Lunsford.\" title=\"Legal article excerpt on record requests and judicial conduct investigations.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Legal article excerpt on record requests and judicial conduct investigations.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">This is a scanned page from The Legal Intelligencer dated 6\/8\/2015, titled 'Centre County to Appeal Injunctions on Records Requests'. It discusses RTKL (Right-to-Know Law) requests involving Grine, Walker, Parks Miller, and Judge Bradley Lunsford. The text includes quotes from Louis Glantz, Castor, Colonna, Lizzy McLellan, and Max Mitchell regarding transparency, propriety of communication, and ongoing investigations by the Office of the Attorney General and Judicial Conduct Board.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-23.png\" data-caption-title=\"Exhibit 3 document page.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows a single-page document titled &#039;EXHIBIT 3&#039; in bold, centered text. At the bottom left, there is a small print statement indicating it was printed from Centre County Online Access on 6\/10\/2015 at 4:12:08 PM.\" data-attachment-id=\"2342\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-23\/3793735486.png\" alt=\"A white page with the text &#039;EXHIBIT 3&#039; centered in large black font and a footer note about printing from Centre County Online Access.\" title=\"Exhibit 3 document page.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Exhibit 3 document page.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows a single-page document titled 'EXHIBIT 3' in bold, centered text. At the bottom left, there is a small print statement indicating it was printed from Centre County Online Access on 6\/10\/2015 at 4:12:08 PM.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-24.png\" data-caption-title=\"Scanned legal correspondence excerpt marked as Exhibit 3.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image displays a printed document containing a U-Mail Confidentiality Notice and a brief excerpt of a message dated November 4, 2014, from Craig Staudenmaier to Louis. The text indicates the content is attorney-client privileged and confidential. A black-and-white EXHIBIT stamp with the number &#039;3&#039; appears in the bottom right corner.\" data-attachment-id=\"2343\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-24\/1373365690.png\" alt=\"A scanned document showing a U-Mail Confidentiality Notice and partial text from a message dated Nov 4, 2014, with an EXHIBIT 3 stamp in the corner.\" title=\"Scanned legal correspondence excerpt marked as Exhibit 3.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Scanned legal correspondence excerpt marked as Exhibit 3.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image displays a printed document containing a U-Mail Confidentiality Notice and a brief excerpt of a message dated November 4, 2014, from Craig Staudenmaier to Louis. The text indicates the content is attorney-client privileged and confidential. A black-and-white EXHIBIT stamp with the number '3' appears in the bottom right corner.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-25.png\" data-caption-title=\"Scanned legal text analyzing public records requests under the RTKL and citing court precedents.\" data-caption-desc=\"This is a scanned page from a legal document or email thread discussing Request for Trial by Jury (RTKJ) analysis. It outlines findings about whether certain records are subject to disclosure, referencing cases like Court of Common Pleas of Lackawanna County v. OOR and Frazier v. Philadelphia County Office of Prothonotary.\" data-attachment-id=\"2344\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-25\/76809077.png\" alt=\"A scanned legal document page discussing public records disclosure, RTKL analysis, and court cases regarding judicial agency records.\" title=\"Scanned legal text analyzing public records requests under the RTKL and citing court precedents.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Scanned legal text analyzing public records requests under the RTKL and citing court precedents.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">This is a scanned page from a legal document or email thread discussing Request for Trial by Jury (RTKJ) analysis. It outlines findings about whether certain records are subject to disclosure, referencing cases like Court of Common Pleas of Lackawanna County v. OOR and Frazier v. Philadelphia County Office of Prothonotary.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-26.png\" data-caption-title=\"Legal analysis of Right-to-Know Law appeals regarding judicial agency records in Pennsylvania.\" data-caption-desc=\"This is a scanned page from a legal opinion or memo dated around June 2015, authored by Craig J. Staudenmaier of Nausan Smith Shabster &amp;amp; Hall LLP in Harrisburg, PA. The text analyzes whether the Office of the Attorney General (OOR) has jurisdiction over Right-to-Know Law appeals from judicial agencies under Pennsylvania law.\" data-attachment-id=\"2345\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-26\/857351947.png\" alt=\"A scanned legal document discussing Right-to-Know Law jurisdiction in Pennsylvania, mentioning OOR, judicial agencies, and court personnel.\" title=\"Legal analysis of Right-to-Know Law appeals regarding judicial agency records in Pennsylvania.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Legal analysis of Right-to-Know Law appeals regarding judicial agency records in Pennsylvania.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">This is a scanned page from a legal opinion or memo dated around June 2015, authored by Craig J. Staudenmaier of Nausan Smith Shabster &amp; Hall LLP in Harrisburg, PA. The text analyzes whether the Office of the Attorney General (OOR) has jurisdiction over Right-to-Know Law appeals from judicial agencies under Pennsylvania law.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-27.png\" data-caption-title=\"Exhibit 4 document page.\" data-caption-desc=\"This is a scanned or printed document page titled &#039;EXHIBIT 4&#039;, with no other visible content except for a small speck near the center. The bottom left corner contains a footer indicating it was printed from Centre County Online Access on 6\/10\/2015 at 4:12:08 PM.\" data-attachment-id=\"2346\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-27\/4022486387.png\" alt=\"A white document page with the text &#039;EXHIBIT 4&#039; centered in large black serif font and a footer note about printing from Centre County Online Access.\" title=\"Exhibit 4 document page.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Exhibit 4 document page.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">This is a scanned or printed document page titled 'EXHIBIT 4', with no other visible content except for a small speck near the center. The bottom left corner contains a footer indicating it was printed from Centre County Online Access on 6\/10\/2015 at 4:12:08 PM.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-28.png\" data-caption-title=\"Official letter denying a public records request from Judge Bradley P. Lunsford&#039;s office.\" data-caption-desc=\"This is a formal letter dated May 18, 2015, from the Centre County Board of Commissioners in Pennsylvania. It responds to a written request for Verizon Wireless Invoice Summaries under the Pennsylvania Right-to-Know law and states that the request has been denied based on a prior court order.\" data-attachment-id=\"2347\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-28\/2414048322.png\" alt=\"A scanned letter from the Centre County Board of Commissioners denying a Right to Know request for Verizon Wireless invoices.\" title=\"Official letter denying a public records request from Judge Bradley P. Lunsford&#039;s office.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Official letter denying a public records request from Judge Bradley P. Lunsford's office.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">This is a formal letter dated May 18, 2015, from the Centre County Board of Commissioners in Pennsylvania. It responds to a written request for Verizon Wireless Invoice Summaries under the Pennsylvania Right-to-Know law and states that the request has been denied based on a prior court order.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-29.png\" data-caption-title=\"Final agency response letter from Centre County Government.\" data-caption-desc=\"This is Page 2 of a formal letter from the Centre County Government, ending with a signature block for Tim Boyde. It includes an enclosure note referencing Judge Kurtz May 13, 2015 Order and a CC to RTK File. The document was printed on 6\/10\/2015 via Centre County Online Access.\" data-attachment-id=\"2348\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-29\/317889954.png\" alt=\"A scanned page from a Centre County Government letter dated May 13, 2015, signed by Tim Boyde, Director of Administration and Open Records Officer.\" title=\"Final agency response letter from Centre County Government.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Final agency response letter from Centre County Government.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">This is Page 2 of a formal letter from the Centre County Government, ending with a signature block for Tim Boyde. It includes an enclosure note referencing Judge Kurtz May 13, 2015 Order and a CC to RTK File. The document was printed on 6\/10\/2015 via Centre County Online Access.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-30.png\" data-caption-title=\"Exhibit 5 document page.\" data-caption-desc=\"This is a scanned or printed document page titled &#039;EXHIBIT 5&#039;. At the bottom left, there is a small text indicating it was printed from Centre County Online Access on 6\/10\/2015 at 4:12:08 PM. The rest of the page is blank except for this title and footer.\" data-attachment-id=\"2349\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-30\/2747773271.png\" alt=\"A white document page with the text &#039;EXHIBIT 5&#039; in large black letters centered on the page, and a footer note about printing from Centre County Online Access.\" title=\"Exhibit 5 document page.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Exhibit 5 document page.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">This is a scanned or printed document page titled 'EXHIBIT 5'. At the bottom left, there is a small text indicating it was printed from Centre County Online Access on 6\/10\/2015 at 4:12:08 PM. The rest of the page is blank except for this title and footer.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-31.png\" data-caption-title=\"Official denial letter regarding a public records request.\" data-caption-desc=\"This is a formal letter dated May 18, 2015, from the Centre County Board of Commissioners in Pennsylvania. It responds to a written request under the Pennsylvania Right-to-Know law for Verizon Wireless invoice summaries related to Judge Bradley P. Lunsford. The county states it has been enjoined from responding directly and directs the requester to contact Kendra Miknis at the Centre County District Court Administrator.\" data-attachment-id=\"2350\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-31\/2419422113.png\" alt=\"A scanned official letter from Centre County Board of Commissioners denying a Right-to-Know request for Verizon Wireless invoices.\" title=\"Official denial letter regarding a public records request.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Official denial letter regarding a public records request.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">This is a formal letter dated May 18, 2015, from the Centre County Board of Commissioners in Pennsylvania. It responds to a written request under the Pennsylvania Right-to-Know law for Verizon Wireless invoice summaries related to Judge Bradley P. Lunsford. The county states it has been enjoined from responding directly and directs the requester to contact Kendra Miknis at the Centre County District Court Administrator.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-32.png\" data-caption-title=\"Final agency response letter from Centre County Government.\" data-caption-desc=\"This is Page 2 of a formal letter from the Centre County Government, signed by Tim Boyde, Director of Administration and Open Records Officer. The document references an enclosure titled &#039;Judge Kurtz May 13, 2015 Order&#039; and includes a cc note for &#039;RTK File&#039;. A footer indicates it was printed from Centre County Online Access on June 10, 2015.\" data-attachment-id=\"2351\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-32\/2814072799.png\" alt=\"A scanned page from a Centre County Government letter signed by Tim Boyde, Director of Administration and Open Records Officer, dated May 13, 2015.\" title=\"Final agency response letter from Centre County Government.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Final agency response letter from Centre County Government.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">This is Page 2 of a formal letter from the Centre County Government, signed by Tim Boyde, Director of Administration and Open Records Officer. The document references an enclosure titled 'Judge Kurtz May 13, 2015 Order' and includes a cc note for 'RTK File'. A footer indicates it was printed from Centre County Online Access on June 10, 2015.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-33.png\" data-caption-title=\"Official correspondence from the Pennsylvania Office of Open Records about a legal appeal process.\" data-caption-desc=\"This is a printed letterhead document from the Pennsylvania Office of Open Records dated May 20, 2015. It addresses parties involved in an official notice of appeal (Docket # AP 2015-0812) and outlines procedures for submitting information under the Right-to-Know Law.\" data-attachment-id=\"2352\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-33\/2070099367.png\" alt=\"A scanned letter from the Pennsylvania Office of Open Records dated May 20, 2015, regarding an official notice of appeal under the Right-to-Know Law.\" title=\"Official correspondence from the Pennsylvania Office of Open Records about a legal appeal process.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Official correspondence from the Pennsylvania Office of Open Records about a legal appeal process.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">This is a printed letterhead document from the Pennsylvania Office of Open Records dated May 20, 2015. It addresses parties involved in an official notice of appeal (Docket # AP 2015-0812) and outlines procedures for submitting information under the Right-to-Know Law.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-34.png\" data-caption-title=\"Legal guidance on public records appeals and third-party notifications.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows a printed page from a legal or administrative document discussing burden of proof in record access cases. It includes sections on notifying third parties, law enforcement records, and informal mediation programs, signed by Nathanael J. Byerly, Acting Executive Director.\" data-attachment-id=\"2353\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-34\/3366395683.png\" alt=\"A scanned legal document detailing agency record access procedures, third-party notification requirements, and mediation programs.\" title=\"Legal guidance on public records appeals and third-party notifications.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Legal guidance on public records appeals and third-party notifications.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows a printed page from a legal or administrative document discussing burden of proof in record access cases. It includes sections on notifying third parties, law enforcement records, and informal mediation programs, signed by Nathanael J. Byerly, Acting Executive Director.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-35.png\" data-caption-title=\"A completed appeal form for a denied right-to-know request submitted to the Pennsylvania Office of Open Records.\" data-caption-desc=\"This is a scanned document showing a &#039;Right to Know Law Appeal&#039; form from the Pennsylvania Office of Open Records, dated May 19, 2015. The form includes fields for requester name, agency details, and reasons for appeal, with checkboxes indicating receipt of supporting documents and agreement to mediation.\" data-attachment-id=\"2354\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-35\/2649291244.png\" alt=\"A scanned form titled &#039;Pennsylvania Office of Open Records Right to Know Law Appeal Denial or Partial Denial&#039; with filled fields and a signature.\" title=\"A completed appeal form for a denied right-to-know request submitted to the Pennsylvania Office of Open Records.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">A completed appeal form for a denied right-to-know request submitted to the Pennsylvania Office of Open Records.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">This is a scanned document showing a 'Right to Know Law Appeal' form from the Pennsylvania Office of Open Records, dated May 19, 2015. The form includes fields for requester name, agency details, and reasons for appeal, with checkboxes indicating receipt of supporting documents and agreement to mediation.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-36.png\" data-caption-title=\"Scanned legal correspondence about a public records appeal.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows a printed document from Centre County Online Access dated June 10, 2015. It contains an email header with redacted sender\/recipient names and addresses, followed by text referencing a notice received on May 20, 2015 regarding an appeal filed under the Office of Open Records.\" data-attachment-id=\"2355\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-36\/2858868114.png\" alt=\"A scanned legal correspondence document with redacted headers, email metadata, and text regarding a public records appeal notice.\" title=\"Scanned legal correspondence about a public records appeal.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Scanned legal correspondence about a public records appeal.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows a printed document from Centre County Online Access dated June 10, 2015. It contains an email header with redacted sender\/recipient names and addresses, followed by text referencing a notice received on May 20, 2015 regarding an appeal filed under the Office of Open Records.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-37.png\" data-caption-title=\"Printed correspondence regarding an appeal filed with the Office of Open Records.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows a scanned page (page 2) of a formal letter or notice from the Centre County Public Defender to Dave R. Crowley, dated May 20, 2015. It includes contact details for direct dial, cell, and fax, along with email addresses linked via mailto: protocol. The body text references an attached appeal filed with the Office of Open Records and directs future correspondence to an Appeals Officer.\" data-attachment-id=\"2356\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-37\/1992212458.png\" alt=\"A printed page from a legal or government document showing contact information, email addresses, and a brief message about an appeal filed with the Office of Open Records.\" title=\"Printed correspondence regarding an appeal filed with the Office of Open Records.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Printed correspondence regarding an appeal filed with the Office of Open Records.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows a scanned page (page 2) of a formal letter or notice from the Centre County Public Defender to Dave R. Crowley, dated May 20, 2015. It includes contact details for direct dial, cell, and fax, along with email addresses linked via mailto: protocol. The body text references an attached appeal filed with the Office of Open Records and directs future correspondence to an Appeals Officer.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-38.png\" data-caption-title=\"Official attestation letter concerning a Right-To-Know Law request and court injunctions.\" data-caption-desc=\"This is a printed legal document titled &#039;Attestation of Timothy T. Boyde&#039; issued by the Centre County Board of Commissioners in Pennsylvania. It details a response to a records request involving Judge Bradley P. Lunsford and District Attorney Stacy Parks-Miller, referencing court docket numbers and redacted information.\" data-attachment-id=\"2357\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-38\/379555547.png\" alt=\"A scanned official document from Centre County Pennsylvania Board of Commissioners regarding an Open Records appeal.\" title=\"Official attestation letter concerning a Right-To-Know Law request and court injunctions.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Official attestation letter concerning a Right-To-Know Law request and court injunctions.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">This is a printed legal document titled 'Attestation of Timothy T. Boyde' issued by the Centre County Board of Commissioners in Pennsylvania. It details a response to a records request involving Judge Bradley P. Lunsford and District Attorney Stacy Parks-Miller, referencing court docket numbers and redacted information.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-39.png\" data-caption-title=\"Notarized affidavit confirming signature on a document related to an appeal filed with the Office of Open Records.\" data-caption-desc=\"This is a scanned legal document titled &#039;Commonwealth of Pennsylvania&#039; containing a sworn statement signed by Timothy T. Boyde, dated May 28, 2015. The document includes a notarial acknowledgment signed and sealed by Kimberly C. Smeltzer, Notary Public, with her commission expiration date listed as July 12, 2018.\" data-attachment-id=\"2358\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-39\/2341365563.png\" alt=\"A scanned legal affidavit from the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania regarding an appeal filed with the Office of Open Records, signed by Timothy T. Boyde and notarized by Kimberly C. S\" title=\"Notarized affidavit confirming signature on a document related to an appeal filed with the Office of Open Records.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Notarized affidavit confirming signature on a document related to an appeal filed with the Office of Open Records.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">This is a scanned legal document titled 'Commonwealth of Pennsylvania' containing a sworn statement signed by Timothy T. Boyde, dated May 28, 2015. The document includes a notarial acknowledgment signed and sealed by Kimberly C. Smeltzer, Notary Public, with her commission expiration date listed as July 12, 2018.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-40.png\" data-caption-title=\"Email exchange about an open records appeal involving Centre County Public Defender.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows a printed email from Timothy T. Boyde dated May 21, 2015, responding to a notice from the Office of Open Records (OOR) regarding an appeal for Centre County Public Defender v. Centre County. The document includes forwarding instructions and references to legal notification requirements under Pennsylvania law.\" data-attachment-id=\"2359\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-40\/1235300932.png\" alt=\"A scanned email correspondence between Timothy T. Boyde and legal officials regarding a Centre County Public Defender appeal to the Office of Open Records.\" title=\"Email exchange about an open records appeal involving Centre County Public Defender.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Email exchange about an open records appeal involving Centre County Public Defender.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows a printed email from Timothy T. Boyde dated May 21, 2015, responding to a notice from the Office of Open Records (OOR) regarding an appeal for Centre County Public Defender v. Centre County. The document includes forwarding instructions and references to legal notification requirements under Pennsylvania law.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-41.png\" data-caption-title=\"Blank page with header information from the Office of Open Records.\" data-caption-desc=\"This is a scanned document page showing only the top section with contact details for Faith Henry, Administrative Officer at the Office of Open Records in Harrisburg, PA. The rest of the page is blank except for a footer indicating it was printed from Centre County Online Access on 6\/10\/2015.\" data-attachment-id=\"2360\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-41\/3173854023.png\" alt=\"Blank page with header information from the Office of Open Records.\" title=\"Blank page with header information from the Office of Open Records.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Blank page with header information from the Office of Open Records.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">This is a scanned document page showing only the top section with contact details for Faith Henry, Administrative Officer at the Office of Open Records in Harrisburg, PA. The rest of the page is blank except for a footer indicating it was printed from Centre County Online Access on 6\/10\/2015.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-42.png\" data-caption-title=\"Legal correspondence from Myers Brier &amp;amp; Kelly concerning a request for judicial communications under Pennsylvania law.\" data-caption-desc=\"This is a scanned letter on official letterhead from Myers Brier &amp;amp; Kelly, dated May 27, 2015. It addresses the Pennsylvania Office of Open Records regarding an appeal docket number AP 2015-0812 involving Judge Bradley P. Lunsford and references to the Pennsylvania Right-to-Know Law.\" data-attachment-id=\"2361\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-42\/2325942073.png\" alt=\"A scanned legal letter from Myers Brier &amp; Kelly dated May 27, 2015, addressed to the Pennsylvania Office of Open Records regarding an appeal docket number AP 2015-0812.\" title=\"Legal correspondence from Myers Brier &amp; Kelly concerning a request for judicial communications under Pennsylvania law.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Legal correspondence from Myers Brier &amp; Kelly concerning a request for judicial communications under Pennsylvania law.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">This is a scanned letter on official letterhead from Myers Brier &amp; Kelly, dated May 27, 2015. It addresses the Pennsylvania Office of Open Records regarding an appeal docket number AP 2015-0812 involving Judge Bradley P. Lunsford and references to the Pennsylvania Right-to-Know Law.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-43.png\" data-caption-title=\"Legal affidavit denying public record access based on judicial orders.\" data-caption-desc=\"This is a scanned page of an official legal affidavit titled &#039;AFFIDAVIT&#039; from Tim Boyde, Director of Administrative Services and Open Records Officer for the County of Centre. The document references Docket # AP 2015-0812 and cites Pennsylvania statutes regarding public records and judicial orders that bar release of certain documents.\" data-attachment-id=\"2362\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-43\/1450929473.png\" alt=\"A scanned legal affidavit document from the County of Centre regarding a Right to Know Request denial dated May 21, 2015.\" title=\"Legal affidavit denying public record access based on judicial orders.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Legal affidavit denying public record access based on judicial orders.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">This is a scanned page of an official legal affidavit titled 'AFFIDAVIT' from Tim Boyde, Director of Administrative Services and Open Records Officer for the County of Centre. The document references Docket # AP 2015-0812 and cites Pennsylvania statutes regarding public records and judicial orders that bar release of certain documents.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-44.png\" data-caption-title=\"Notarized acknowledgment form for Tim Boyde executed in Centre County, Pennsylvania.\" data-caption-desc=\"This is a scanned legal document page from the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, specifically an acknowledgment and notarization form. It includes handwritten entries for the date (May 28, 2015), signatures of Tim Boyde and Notary Public Kimberly C. Smeltzer, and references to 18 Pa. C.S.A. Section 4904 regarding unsworn falsification penalties.\" data-attachment-id=\"2363\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-44\/3854518213.png\" alt=\"A scanned legal acknowledgment page from Pennsylvania, signed by Tim Boyde and notarized by Kimberly C. Smeltzer on May 28, 2015.\" title=\"Notarized acknowledgment form for Tim Boyde executed in Centre County, Pennsylvania.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Notarized acknowledgment form for Tim Boyde executed in Centre County, Pennsylvania.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">This is a scanned legal document page from the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, specifically an acknowledgment and notarization form. It includes handwritten entries for the date (May 28, 2015), signatures of Tim Boyde and Notary Public Kimberly C. Smeltzer, and references to 18 Pa. C.S.A. Section 4904 regarding unsworn falsification penalties.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-45.png\" data-caption-title=\"Final Determination document from the Pennsylvania Office of Open Records.\" data-caption-desc=\"This is a scanned page from a Final Determination issued by the Pennsylvania Office of Open Records. The document concerns a dispute between Drew Johnson (on behalf of The Washington Times) and Bedford County regarding records requests under the Right-to-Know Law. It states that the appeal was granted and the county must take further action.\" data-attachment-id=\"2364\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-45\/2968559882.png\" alt=\"A scanned legal document from the Pennsylvania Office of Open Records detailing a final determination regarding records requests.\" title=\"Final Determination document from the Pennsylvania Office of Open Records.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Final Determination document from the Pennsylvania Office of Open Records.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">This is a scanned page from a Final Determination issued by the Pennsylvania Office of Open Records. The document concerns a dispute between Drew Johnson (on behalf of The Washington Times) and Bedford County regarding records requests under the Right-to-Know Law. It states that the appeal was granted and the county must take further action.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-46.png\" data-caption-title=\"Page 2 of a legal document outlining requests for public records related to District Attorney Bill Higgins.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows a two-page scanned document with the heading &#039;FACTUAL BACKGROUND&#039; listing three categories of requested records: telephone records, internet browsing history, and email account screenshots. The text references dates in January and February 2015 and cites Pennsylvania Public Records Law sections.\" data-attachment-id=\"2365\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-46\/2273215860.png\" alt=\"A scanned legal document page titled &#039;FACTUAL BACKGROUND&#039; detailing record requests from January 2015 regarding phone, internet, and email records.\" title=\"Page 2 of a legal document outlining requests for public records related to District Attorney Bill Higgins.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Page 2 of a legal document outlining requests for public records related to District Attorney Bill Higgins.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows a two-page scanned document with the heading 'FACTUAL BACKGROUND' listing three categories of requested records: telephone records, internet browsing history, and email account screenshots. The text references dates in January and February 2015 and cites Pennsylvania Public Records Law sections.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-47.png\" data-caption-title=\"Page 3 of a legal document detailing appeal procedures and right-to-know law analysis.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows a printed legal document page with text about appeals, public records exemptions, and the Right to Know Law. It includes case citations like SWB Yankees L.L.C. v. Wintermantel and references Pennsylvania statutes such as 65 P.S. \u00a7 67.1101(c). The footer indicates it was printed from Centre County Online Access on 6\/10\/2015.\" data-attachment-id=\"2366\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-47\/1537664780.png\" alt=\"A scanned legal document page discussing appeals, public records, and Right to Know Law analysis.\" title=\"Page 3 of a legal document detailing appeal procedures and right-to-know law analysis.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Page 3 of a legal document detailing appeal procedures and right-to-know law analysis.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows a printed legal document page with text about appeals, public records exemptions, and the Right to Know Law. It includes case citations like SWB Yankees L.L.C. v. Wintermantel and references Pennsylvania statutes such as 65 P.S. \u00a7 67.1101(c). The footer indicates it was printed from Centre County Online Access on 6\/10\/2015.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-48.png\" data-caption-title=\"Legal text excerpt regarding appeals process and public record exemptions.\" data-caption-desc=\"This is a single-page scan of a legal document, likely from a court opinion or brief, citing Pennsylvania statutes (65 P.S.) and case law. The text discusses the Office of Open Records&#039; authority to hear appeals, the requirements for disclosing public records under the Right-to-Know Law (RTKL), and the burden of proof on agencies to demonstrate record exemptions.\" data-attachment-id=\"2367\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-48\/998757949.png\" alt=\"A scanned legal document page discussing appeals authority, public records disclosure under RTKL, and burden of proof standards.\" title=\"Legal text excerpt regarding appeals process and public record exemptions.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Legal text excerpt regarding appeals process and public record exemptions.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">This is a single-page scan of a legal document, likely from a court opinion or brief, citing Pennsylvania statutes (65 P.S.) and case law. The text discusses the Office of Open Records' authority to hear appeals, the requirements for disclosing public records under the Right-to-Know Law (RTKL), and the burden of proof on agencies to demonstrate record exemptions.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-49.png\" data-caption-title=\"Legal text analyzing the sufficiency of public records requests.\" data-caption-desc=\"This is a single-page scan of a legal document, likely from a court opinion or brief. The visible text discusses the &#039;Requests are sufficiently specific&#039; threshold matter regarding public records law (RTKL). It cites cases like Pa. State Troopers Ass&#039;n v. Scolforo and mentions District Attorney Higgins.\" data-attachment-id=\"2368\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-49\/2794864605.png\" alt=\"A scanned legal document page discussing public records requests and specificity requirements under Pennsylvania law.\" title=\"Legal text analyzing the sufficiency of public records requests.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Legal text analyzing the sufficiency of public records requests.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">This is a single-page scan of a legal document, likely from a court opinion or brief. The visible text discusses the 'Requests are sufficiently specific' threshold matter regarding public records law (RTKL). It cites cases like Pa. State Troopers Ass'n v. Scolforo and mentions District Attorney Higgins.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-50.png\" data-caption-title=\"Legal text analyzing the specificity of electronic record requests in Pennsylvania court cases.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows a single page (page 6) of a typed legal opinion or brief, citing cases like Worcester and Baxter regarding whether email requests are sufficiently specific. It discusses requirements for subject matter and timeframes in discovery requests involving government agencies.\" data-attachment-id=\"2369\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-50\/396563240.png\" alt=\"A scanned page from a legal document discussing email request specificity under Pennsylvania law.\" title=\"Legal text analyzing the specificity of electronic record requests in Pennsylvania court cases.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Legal text analyzing the specificity of electronic record requests in Pennsylvania court cases.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows a single page (page 6) of a typed legal opinion or brief, citing cases like Worcester and Baxter regarding whether email requests are sufficiently specific. It discusses requirements for subject matter and timeframes in discovery requests involving government agencies.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-51.png\" data-caption-title=\"Page 7 of a legal opinion regarding public records access and OOR jurisdiction.\" data-caption-desc=\"This is a scanned page (page 7) from a Pennsylvania Open Records appeal decision. The text discusses the specificity of document requests, the Office of the Appeals Officer&#039;s (OOR) jurisdiction over appeals involving criminal investigations, and cites statutes like 65 P.S. \u00a7 67.708(b)(16). It references cases such as Dep&#039;t of Environ. Prot. v. Legere and Silver v. City of Pittsburgh.\" data-attachment-id=\"2370\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-51\/609341918.png\" alt=\"A scanned page from a legal document discussing public records requests, jurisdiction over appeals, and criminal investigation exemptions.\" title=\"Page 7 of a legal opinion regarding public records access and OOR jurisdiction.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Page 7 of a legal opinion regarding public records access and OOR jurisdiction.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">This is a scanned page (page 7) from a Pennsylvania Open Records appeal decision. The text discusses the specificity of document requests, the Office of the Appeals Officer's (OOR) jurisdiction over appeals involving criminal investigations, and cites statutes like 65 P.S. \u00a7 67.708(b)(16). It references cases such as Dep't of Environ. Prot. v. Legere and Silver v. City of Pittsburgh.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-52.png\" data-caption-title=\"Legal text arguing that Bedford County District Attorney&#039;s Office records are not exempt under RTKL due to lack of criminal investigation content.\" data-caption-desc=\"This is a scanned page from a legal document, likely a court brief or opinion, discussing the Right-to-Know Law (RTKL) and record exemptions. It references cases such as Mattes v. Westtown-East Goshen Regional Police Dep&#039;t and Levy v. Senate of Pa., arguing that possession by the District Attorney\u2019s Office does not make records related to criminal investigations exempt.\" data-attachment-id=\"2371\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-52\/333444512.png\" alt=\"A scanned legal document page discussing records exemption under Section 708(b)(16) of the RTKL, citing cases like Mattes v. Westtown-East Goshen Regional Police Dep&#039;t.\" title=\"Legal text arguing that Bedford County District Attorney&#039;s Office records are not exempt under RTKL due to lack of criminal investigation content.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Legal text arguing that Bedford County District Attorney's Office records are not exempt under RTKL due to lack of criminal investigation content.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">This is a scanned page from a legal document, likely a court brief or opinion, discussing the Right-to-Know Law (RTKL) and record exemptions. It references cases such as Mattes v. Westtown-East Goshen Regional Police Dep't and Levy v. Senate of Pa., arguing that possession by the District Attorney\u2019s Office does not make records related to criminal investigations exempt.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-53.png\" data-caption-title=\"Page 9 of a legal opinion addressing public records requests and appeal procedures.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows a printed legal document page with text referencing Section 708(b)(16) of the RTKL, District Attorney Higgins, and the definition of &#039;record&#039; under 65 P.S. \u00a7 67.102. The footer indicates it was printed from Centre County Online Access on 6\/10\/2015.\" data-attachment-id=\"2372\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-53\/3473381336.png\" alt=\"A scanned legal document page discussing public access exemptions, appeals, and record definitions under Pennsylvania law.\" title=\"Page 9 of a legal opinion addressing public records requests and appeal procedures.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Page 9 of a legal opinion addressing public records requests and appeal procedures.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows a printed legal document page with text referencing Section 708(b)(16) of the RTKL, District Attorney Higgins, and the definition of 'record' under 65 P.S. \u00a7 67.102. The footer indicates it was printed from Centre County Online Access on 6\/10\/2015.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-54.png\" data-caption-title=\"Legal text analyzing record definitions and evidentiary standards under the Right-to-Know Law.\" data-caption-desc=\"This is a single-page scan of a legal opinion or brief discussing the definition of &#039;record&#039; under the Pennsylvania Right-to-Know Law (RTKL). The page cites multiple court cases including Sherry v. Radnor Township, Moore v. Office of Open Records, and Gould v. North Strabane Township. It argues that unsworn statements by county officials are not competent evidence to withhold records.\" data-attachment-id=\"2373\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-54\/2093202780.png\" alt=\"A scanned legal document page discussing record definitions under the RTKL, citing Pennsylvania and federal court cases.\" title=\"Legal text analyzing record definitions and evidentiary standards under the Right-to-Know Law.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Legal text analyzing record definitions and evidentiary standards under the Right-to-Know Law.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">This is a single-page scan of a legal opinion or brief discussing the definition of 'record' under the Pennsylvania Right-to-Know Law (RTKL). The page cites multiple court cases including Sherry v. Radnor Township, Moore v. Office of Open Records, and Gould v. North Strabane Township. It argues that unsworn statements by county officials are not competent evidence to withhold records.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-55.png\" data-caption-title=\"Page 11 of a legal opinion discussing public records exemptions.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows a printed legal document, likely from Centre County Online Access, dated 6\/10\/2015. It contains two numbered arguments (4 and 5) regarding whether certain records are exempt or do not exist under Pennsylvania\u2019s Right-to-Know Law (RTKL). Citations include Van Osdol, Thomas v. Shohola Township, and Hodges.\" data-attachment-id=\"2374\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-55\/697064339.png\" alt=\"A scanned legal document page with numbered arguments about record exemptions and existence under RTKL law.\" title=\"Page 11 of a legal opinion discussing public records exemptions.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Page 11 of a legal opinion discussing public records exemptions.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows a printed legal document, likely from Centre County Online Access, dated 6\/10\/2015. It contains two numbered arguments (4 and 5) regarding whether certain records are exempt or do not exist under Pennsylvania\u2019s Right-to-Know Law (RTKL). Citations include Van Osdol, Thomas v. Shohola Township, and Hodges.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-56.png\" data-caption-title=\"Page 12 of a legal determination granting an appeal, signed by Joshua T. Young, Esq.\" data-caption-desc=\"This is a scanned page from a legal document titled &#039;CONCLUSION&#039;, stating that a requester&#039;s appeal was granted and outlining procedures for record access and further appeals. It includes a signature line for Appeals Officer Joshua T. Young, Esq., dated April 29, 2015, and lists recipients via e-mail only.\" data-attachment-id=\"2375\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-56\/503480301.png\" alt=\"A scanned legal document page titled &#039;CONCLUSION&#039; with text about an appeal being granted, a signature line for Joshua T. Young, Esq., and recipient details.\" title=\"Page 12 of a legal determination granting an appeal, signed by Joshua T. Young, Esq.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Page 12 of a legal determination granting an appeal, signed by Joshua T. Young, Esq.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">This is a scanned page from a legal document titled 'CONCLUSION', stating that a requester's appeal was granted and outlining procedures for record access and further appeals. It includes a signature line for Appeals Officer Joshua T. Young, Esq., dated April 29, 2015, and lists recipients via e-mail only.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-57.png\" data-caption-title=\"A formal attestation document regarding third-party record access from the Centre County District Attorney&#039;s Office.\" data-caption-desc=\"This is a scanned page of a legal document titled &#039;Attestation of Third Party&#039; issued by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Office of the District Attorney for Centre County. The document includes contact information for Stacy Parks Miller and Mark S. Smith, lists records requested as cellular phone records belonging to judicial agencies, and contains numbered declarations about record handling practices.\" data-attachment-id=\"2376\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-57\/3269074325.png\" alt=\"A scanned legal document titled &#039;Attestation of Third Party&#039; from the County of Centre Office of the District Attorney, detailing records requests and declarations.\" title=\"A formal attestation document regarding third-party record access from the Centre County District Attorney&#039;s Office.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">A formal attestation document regarding third-party record access from the Centre County District Attorney's Office.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">This is a scanned page of a legal document titled 'Attestation of Third Party' issued by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Office of the District Attorney for Centre County. The document includes contact information for Stacy Parks Miller and Mark S. Smith, lists records requested as cellular phone records belonging to judicial agencies, and contains numbered declarations about record handling practices.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-58.png\" data-caption-title=\"Legal document excerpt regarding judicial records and county transparency.\" data-caption-desc=\"This is a two-page scan of a legal filing or opinion dated June 5, 2015, from the Centre County District Attorney\u2019s Office. The text references cases like Lackawanna County v. Pa Office of Open Records and discusses issues involving judges, record releases, and separation of powers.\" data-attachment-id=\"2377\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-58\/2734369956.png\" alt=\"A scanned legal document page with numbered paragraphs discussing judicial records, county officials, and Right to Know laws.\" title=\"Legal document excerpt regarding judicial records and county transparency.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Legal document excerpt regarding judicial records and county transparency.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">This is a two-page scan of a legal filing or opinion dated June 5, 2015, from the Centre County District Attorney\u2019s Office. The text references cases like Lackawanna County v. Pa Office of Open Records and discusses issues involving judges, record releases, and separation of powers.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-59.png\" data-caption-title=\"Legal document excerpt regarding judicial record access and privacy rulings in Centre County.\" data-caption-desc=\"This is a printed page (Page 3 of 6) from the Centre County District Attorney\u2019s Office dated June 5, 2015. It contains numbered text describing Judge Stewart Kurtz\u2019s rulings on public records, RTKL requests, and judicial privacy under Pennsylvania law.\" data-attachment-id=\"2378\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-59\/1072350532.png\" alt=\"A scanned legal document page from June 5, 2015, detailing Judge Stewart Kurtz rulings on Centre County records and privacy rights.\" title=\"Legal document excerpt regarding judicial record access and privacy rulings in Centre County.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Legal document excerpt regarding judicial record access and privacy rulings in Centre County.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">This is a printed page (Page 3 of 6) from the Centre County District Attorney\u2019s Office dated June 5, 2015. It contains numbered text describing Judge Stewart Kurtz\u2019s rulings on public records, RTKL requests, and judicial privacy under Pennsylvania law.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-60.png\" data-caption-title=\"Legal document outlining judicial record access and appeals processes for Centre County.\" data-caption-desc=\"This is a printed page (Page 4 of 6) from a legal opinion or memo issued by the Centre County District Attorney&#039;s Office on June 5, 2015. The text discusses restrictions on obtaining records related to the Judiciary and District Attorney&#039;s Office, identifies specific officers for handling requests, and cites Pennsylvania laws regarding judicial review.\" data-attachment-id=\"2379\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-60\/2687090999.png\" alt=\"A scanned legal document page from Centre County District Attorney&#039;s Office dated June 5, 2015, detailing judicial records and right to know procedures.\" title=\"Legal document outlining judicial record access and appeals processes for Centre County.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Legal document outlining judicial record access and appeals processes for Centre County.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">This is a printed page (Page 4 of 6) from a legal opinion or memo issued by the Centre County District Attorney's Office on June 5, 2015. The text discusses restrictions on obtaining records related to the Judiciary and District Attorney's Office, identifies specific officers for handling requests, and cites Pennsylvania laws regarding judicial review.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-61.png\" data-caption-title=\"Legal brief excerpt regarding Right to Know Law jurisdiction over judicial records.\" data-caption-desc=\"This is a scanned page (Page 5 of 6) from a legal document issued by the Centre County District Attorney&#039;s Office on June 5, 2015. The text discusses Pennsylvania Right to Know Law \u00a7 503 and cites cases like Lackawanna County Court of Common Pleas v. Office of Open Records regarding jurisdiction over judicial records.\" data-attachment-id=\"2380\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-61\/2855275209.png\" alt=\"A scanned legal document page from the Centre County District Attorney&#039;s Office dated June 5, 2015, discussing Right to Know Law jurisdiction and judicial records.\" title=\"Legal brief excerpt regarding Right to Know Law jurisdiction over judicial records.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Legal brief excerpt regarding Right to Know Law jurisdiction over judicial records.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">This is a scanned page (Page 5 of 6) from a legal document issued by the Centre County District Attorney's Office on June 5, 2015. The text discusses Pennsylvania Right to Know Law \u00a7 503 and cites cases like Lackawanna County Court of Common Pleas v. Office of Open Records regarding jurisdiction over judicial records.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-62.png\" data-caption-title=\"Page 6 of a legal opinion signed by Stacy Parks Miller, Open Records Officer, Centre County District Attorney\u2019s Office.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows a printed legal document titled &#039;COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA COUNTY OF CENTRE&#039; with arguments regarding judicial agency and record dissemination. It includes typed text, two signatures (Stacy Parks Miller and Emily J. McGinley), and a notarial seal dated May 2, 2018.\" data-attachment-id=\"2381\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-62\/2646486711.png\" alt=\"A scanned legal document page from Centre County District Attorney&#039;s Office dated June 5, 2015, containing text arguments, signatures of Stacy Parks Miller and notary Emily J. McGi\" title=\"Page 6 of a legal opinion signed by Stacy Parks Miller, Open Records Officer, Centre County District Attorney\u2019s Office.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Page 6 of a legal opinion signed by Stacy Parks Miller, Open Records Officer, Centre County District Attorney\u2019s Office.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows a printed legal document titled 'COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA COUNTY OF CENTRE' with arguments regarding judicial agency and record dissemination. It includes typed text, two signatures (Stacy Parks Miller and Emily J. McGinley), and a notarial seal dated May 2, 2018.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-63.png\" data-caption-title=\"Scanned page of a legal exhibit with confidentiality notices and defendant\u2019s exhibit labeling.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows a printed document containing an email confidentiality notice dated November 4, 2014, referencing Craig Staudenmayer. It includes text stating the content is attorney-client privileged and confidential. In the bottom right corner is a black stamp reading &#039;DEFENDANT&#039;S EXHIBIT&#039; with handwritten notation &#039;A-7&#039;. The footer indicates it was printed from Centre County Online Access on June 10, 2015.\" data-attachment-id=\"2382\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-63\/1097223375.png\" alt=\"A scanned legal document showing an email confidentiality notice, attorney-client privilege statement, and a &#039;Defendant&#039;s Exhibit A-7&#039; stamp.\" title=\"Scanned page of a legal exhibit with confidentiality notices and defendant\u2019s exhibit labeling.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Scanned page of a legal exhibit with confidentiality notices and defendant\u2019s exhibit labeling.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows a printed document containing an email confidentiality notice dated November 4, 2014, referencing Craig Staudenmayer. It includes text stating the content is attorney-client privileged and confidential. In the bottom right corner is a black stamp reading 'DEFENDANT'S EXHIBIT' with handwritten notation 'A-7'. The footer indicates it was printed from Centre County Online Access on June 10, 2015.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-64.png\" data-caption-title=\"Legal document excerpt analyzing RTKL precedent on judicial agency records.\" data-caption-desc=\"This is a single-page scan of a legal memorandum or research brief discussing the Right to Know Law (RTKL). The text outlines findings about whether emails between a DA&#039;s office and County are subject to disclosure, citing case law such as Court of Common Pleas of Lackawanna County v. OOR and Frazier v. Philadelphia County Office of Prothonotary.\" data-attachment-id=\"2383\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-64\/4070729291.png\" alt=\"A scanned page of a legal document discussing RTKL (Right to Know Law) analysis regarding judicial agencies and record disclosure.\" title=\"Legal document excerpt analyzing RTKL precedent on judicial agency records.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Legal document excerpt analyzing RTKL precedent on judicial agency records.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">This is a single-page scan of a legal memorandum or research brief discussing the Right to Know Law (RTKL). The text outlines findings about whether emails between a DA's office and County are subject to disclosure, citing case law such as Court of Common Pleas of Lackawanna County v. OOR and Frazier v. Philadelphia County Office of Prothonotary.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-65.png\" data-caption-title=\"Legal memorandum addressing RTKL appeal jurisdiction and record disclosure standards.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows a typed legal document from Craig J. Staudenmaier of Nauman, Smith, Shissler &amp;amp; Hall LLP discussing Right-to-Know Law (RTKL) jurisdiction over court records and personnel definitions under Pennsylvania law. It includes citations to Pa.R.J.A. No. 102 and notes on internal court records not being subject to disclosure.\" data-attachment-id=\"2384\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-65\/2817360004.png\" alt=\"A scanned legal document discussing Right-to-Know Law jurisdiction, judicial system personnel definitions, and email record disclosure in Pennsylvania.\" title=\"Legal memorandum addressing RTKL appeal jurisdiction and record disclosure standards.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Legal memorandum addressing RTKL appeal jurisdiction and record disclosure standards.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows a typed legal document from Craig J. Staudenmaier of Nauman, Smith, Shissler &amp; Hall LLP discussing Right-to-Know Law (RTKL) jurisdiction over court records and personnel definitions under Pennsylvania law. It includes citations to Pa.R.J.A. No. 102 and notes on internal court records not being subject to disclosure.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-66.png\" data-caption-title=\"Legal Order in Centre County, PA, restricting public records requests related to a plaintiff.\" data-caption-desc=\"This is a scanned court order from the Civil Division of the Court of Common Pleas of Centre County, Pennsylvania. It orders that the County of Centre be enjoined from responding to any request for judicial records under the Pennsylvania Right-to-Know Law and directs such requests to the District Court Administrator instead.\" data-attachment-id=\"2385\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-66\/2422449402.png\" alt=\"A scanned legal order from the Court of Common Pleas of Centre County, Pennsylvania, dated May 5th, 2015, regarding a Right-to-Know Law request.\" title=\"Legal Order in Centre County, PA, restricting public records requests related to a plaintiff.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Legal Order in Centre County, PA, restricting public records requests related to a plaintiff.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">This is a scanned court order from the Civil Division of the Court of Common Pleas of Centre County, Pennsylvania. It orders that the County of Centre be enjoined from responding to any request for judicial records under the Pennsylvania Right-to-Know Law and directs such requests to the District Court Administrator instead.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-67.png\" data-caption-title=\"Page of a court order regarding security and injunction dissolution.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows a printed legal document with two numbered clauses: one continuing previously deposited security until action termination, and another dissolving a special injunction entered March 16. Below the text is a signature line labeled &#039;BY THE COURT,&#039; with an illegible handwritten signature and initials &#039;S.J.&#039; A footer indicates it was printed from Centre County Online Access on 6\/10\/2015.\" data-attachment-id=\"2386\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-67\/1287374466.png\" alt=\"A scanned legal document page showing numbered clauses about security and injunctions, signed by a court official.\" title=\"Page of a court order regarding security and injunction dissolution.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Page of a court order regarding security and injunction dissolution.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows a printed legal document with two numbered clauses: one continuing previously deposited security until action termination, and another dissolving a special injunction entered March 16. Below the text is a signature line labeled 'BY THE COURT,' with an illegible handwritten signature and initials 'S.J.' A footer indicates it was printed from Centre County Online Access on 6\/10\/2015.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-68.png\" data-caption-title=\"Court Order Enjoining the County of Centre Regarding Judicial Records Requests\" data-caption-desc=\"This is a scanned legal document titled &#039;ORDER&#039; from the Civil Division of the Court of Common Pleas of Centre County, Pennsylvania. It orders that the County of Centre be enjoined from responding to requests for judicial records under the Pennsylvania Right-to-Know Law and directs such requests to the Prothonotary instead.\" data-attachment-id=\"2387\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-68\/748353459.png\" alt=\"A scanned legal order from the Court of Common Pleas of Centre County, Pennsylvania, dated May 5, 2015, regarding a request for judicial records under the Pennsylvania Right-to-Kno\" title=\"Court Order Enjoining the County of Centre Regarding Judicial Records Requests\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Court Order Enjoining the County of Centre Regarding Judicial Records Requests<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">This is a scanned legal document titled 'ORDER' from the Civil Division of the Court of Common Pleas of Centre County, Pennsylvania. It orders that the County of Centre be enjoined from responding to requests for judicial records under the Pennsylvania Right-to-Know Law and directs such requests to the Prothonotary instead.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-69.png\" data-caption-title=\"Page of a court order denying preliminary injunction requests and dissolving prior special injunctions.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows the bottom portion of a printed legal document with three numbered rulings regarding injunctions against the McShane Firm, LLC, and Theodore C. Tanski. A handwritten signature appears below &#039;BY THE COURT,&#039; followed by initials S.J., and a footer indicates it was printed from Centre County Online Access on 6\/10\/2015.\" data-attachment-id=\"2388\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-69\/2978684499.png\" alt=\"A scanned legal document page showing numbered court rulings on injunctions, security deposits, and a judge&#039;s signature.\" title=\"Page of a court order denying preliminary injunction requests and dissolving prior special injunctions.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Page of a court order denying preliminary injunction requests and dissolving prior special injunctions.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows the bottom portion of a printed legal document with three numbered rulings regarding injunctions against the McShane Firm, LLC, and Theodore C. Tanski. A handwritten signature appears below 'BY THE COURT,' followed by initials S.J., and a footer indicates it was printed from Centre County Online Access on 6\/10\/2015.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-70.png\" data-caption-title=\"Court Order directing records requests to be forwarded to the District Court Administrator.\" data-caption-desc=\"This is a scanned legal document titled &#039;ORDER&#039; from the Centre County Court of Common Pleas in Pennsylvania. It was issued on May 13, 2015, and directs that all records requests related to the Judiciary shall be forwarded to Kendra J. Miknis, District Court Administrator. The order is signed by President Judge Thomas King Kistler.\" data-attachment-id=\"2389\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-70\/12464806.png\" alt=\"A legal court order from Centre County Court of Common Pleas, Pennsylvania, dated May 13, 2015, signed by President Judge Thomas King Kistler.\" title=\"Court Order directing records requests to be forwarded to the District Court Administrator.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Court Order directing records requests to be forwarded to the District Court Administrator.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">This is a scanned legal document titled 'ORDER' from the Centre County Court of Common Pleas in Pennsylvania. It was issued on May 13, 2015, and directs that all records requests related to the Judiciary shall be forwarded to Kendra J. Miknis, District Court Administrator. The order is signed by President Judge Thomas King Kistler.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-71.png\" data-caption-title=\"Court order enjoining the County of Centre from responding to Right-to-Know requests regarding judicial records.\" data-caption-desc=\"This is a scanned legal document titled &#039;ORDER&#039; issued by the Court of Common Pleas of Centre County, Pennsylvania, on May 13, 2015. It enjoins the County of Centre from making any response to requests made pursuant to the Pennsylvania Right-to-Know law for judicial records relating to the Plaintiff. The order is signed by Stewart L. Kurtz, II, Senior Judge, Specially Presiding, 20th Judicial District.\" data-attachment-id=\"2390\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-71\/860680272.png\" alt=\"A scanned legal order from the Court of Common Pleas of Centre County, Pennsylvania, dated May 13, 2015, involving Stacy Parks Miller and Sean P. McGraw et al., with a signature of\" title=\"Court order enjoining the County of Centre from responding to Right-to-Know requests regarding judicial records.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Court order enjoining the County of Centre from responding to Right-to-Know requests regarding judicial records.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">This is a scanned legal document titled 'ORDER' issued by the Court of Common Pleas of Centre County, Pennsylvania, on May 13, 2015. It enjoins the County of Centre from making any response to requests made pursuant to the Pennsylvania Right-to-Know law for judicial records relating to the Plaintiff. The order is signed by Stewart L. Kurtz, II, Senior Judge, Specially Presiding, 20th Judicial District.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-72.png\" data-caption-title=\"Legal determination dismissing an appeal for open records related to judicial employee salaries.\" data-caption-desc=\"This is a printed legal determination dated May 1, 2014, issued by the Pennsylvania Office of Open Records. It concerns a request by Jonathan Dunsinger for salary information from Susquehanna County&#039;s Adult and Juvenile Probation and Domestic Relations offices. The document concludes that the Office of Open Records lacks jurisdiction over these records because they pertain to judicial employees.\" data-attachment-id=\"2391\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-72\/79877166.png\" alt=\"A scanned legal document from the Pennsylvania Office of Open Records regarding a request for salary information by Jonathan Dunsinger.\" title=\"Legal determination dismissing an appeal for open records related to judicial employee salaries.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Legal determination dismissing an appeal for open records related to judicial employee salaries.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">This is a printed legal determination dated May 1, 2014, issued by the Pennsylvania Office of Open Records. It concerns a request by Jonathan Dunsinger for salary information from Susquehanna County's Adult and Juvenile Probation and Domestic Relations offices. The document concludes that the Office of Open Records lacks jurisdiction over these records because they pertain to judicial employees.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-73.png\" data-caption-title=\"Final determination notice from a legal case involving Jonathan Dunsinger.\" data-caption-desc=\"This is a two-page scan of a legal document titled &#039;IN THE MATTER OF JONATHAN DUNSINGER...&#039;. It includes a final determination issued and mailed on May 1, 2014, with the Appeals Officer listed as Angela Eveler, Esq. The bottom notes copyright by Thomson Reuters (2015) and indicates it was printed from Centre County Online Access on June 10, 2015.\" data-attachment-id=\"2392\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-73\/3625629270.png\" alt=\"A scanned legal document page showing final determination details for Jonathan Dunsinger, issued May 1, 2014, with appeals officer Angela Eveler listed.\" title=\"Final determination notice from a legal case involving Jonathan Dunsinger.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Final determination notice from a legal case involving Jonathan Dunsinger.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">This is a two-page scan of a legal document titled 'IN THE MATTER OF JONATHAN DUNSINGER...'. It includes a final determination issued and mailed on May 1, 2014, with the Appeals Officer listed as Angela Eveler, Esq. The bottom notes copyright by Thomson Reuters (2015) and indicates it was printed from Centre County Online Access on June 10, 2015.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-74.png\" data-caption-title=\"Exhibit 6 document page.\" data-caption-desc=\"This is a scanned or printed page titled &#039;EXHIBIT 6&#039;, likely part of a legal or official document set. At the bottom, there is a small text indicating it was printed from Centre County Online Access on 6\/10\/2015 at 4:12:08 PM.\" data-attachment-id=\"2393\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-74\/1809751250.png\" alt=\"A white page with the text &#039;EXHIBIT 6&#039; centered in large black font and a footer note about printing from Centre County Online Access.\" title=\"Exhibit 6 document page.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Exhibit 6 document page.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">This is a scanned or printed page titled 'EXHIBIT 6', likely part of a legal or official document set. At the bottom, there is a small text indicating it was printed from Centre County Online Access on 6\/10\/2015 at 4:12:08 PM.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-75.png\" data-caption-title=\"An official affidavit denying a right-to-know request based on judicial orders.\" data-caption-desc=\"This is a typed legal document titled &#039;AFFIDAVIT&#039; sworn by Tim Boyde, Director of Administrative Services for the County of Centre. It addresses an appeal regarding public records requests, citing Pennsylvania statutes and referencing attached orders and exhibits.\" data-attachment-id=\"2394\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-75\/1049721373.png\" alt=\"A scanned legal affidavit document from the County of Centre regarding public records requests and judicial orders.\" title=\"An official affidavit denying a right-to-know request based on judicial orders.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">An official affidavit denying a right-to-know request based on judicial orders.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">This is a typed legal document titled 'AFFIDAVIT' sworn by Tim Boyde, Director of Administrative Services for the County of Centre. It addresses an appeal regarding public records requests, citing Pennsylvania statutes and referencing attached orders and exhibits.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-76.png\" data-caption-title=\"Notary acknowledgment page signed by Tim Boyde and notarized by Kimberly C. Smeltzer in Centre County, PA.\" data-caption-desc=\"This is a scanned legal document page from the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, specifically a notary acknowledgment form for Tim Boyde dated May 28, 2015. The document includes handwritten signatures, a notarial seal, and references to Pennsylvania law regarding false statements. It appears to be part of an official record or court filing.\" data-attachment-id=\"2395\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-76\/153050723.png\" alt=\"A scanned legal document page from Pennsylvania showing a notary acknowledgment for Tim Boyde dated May 28, 2015.\" title=\"Notary acknowledgment page signed by Tim Boyde and notarized by Kimberly C. Smeltzer in Centre County, PA.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Notary acknowledgment page signed by Tim Boyde and notarized by Kimberly C. Smeltzer in Centre County, PA.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">This is a scanned legal document page from the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, specifically a notary acknowledgment form for Tim Boyde dated May 28, 2015. The document includes handwritten signatures, a notarial seal, and references to Pennsylvania law regarding false statements. It appears to be part of an official record or court filing.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-77.png\" data-caption-title=\"Final Determination document from the Pennsylvania Office of Open Records concerning Drew Johnson and The Washington Times.\" data-caption-desc=\"This is a scanned page from a Final Determination issued by the Pennsylvania Office of Open Records. It outlines an appeal against Bedford County&#039;s denial of records requests related to District Attorney William Higgins, Jr., which was granted. The document includes case details, docket number AP 2015-0288, and references the Right-to-Know Law.\" data-attachment-id=\"2396\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-77\/3586604059.png\" alt=\"A scanned legal document from the Pennsylvania Office of Open Records detailing a final determination regarding record requests.\" title=\"Final Determination document from the Pennsylvania Office of Open Records concerning Drew Johnson and The Washington Times.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Final Determination document from the Pennsylvania Office of Open Records concerning Drew Johnson and The Washington Times.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">This is a scanned page from a Final Determination issued by the Pennsylvania Office of Open Records. It outlines an appeal against Bedford County's denial of records requests related to District Attorney William Higgins, Jr., which was granted. The document includes case details, docket number AP 2015-0288, and references the Right-to-Know Law.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-78.png\" data-caption-title=\"Page 2 of a legal document detailing record requests and responses between January and February 2015.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows a scanned page from a legal document titled &#039;FACTUAL BACKGROUND&#039; that lists three specific record requests made on January 13, 2015. The text details demands for telephone records, internet browsing history, and email account screenshots related to the District Attorney&#039;s Office. It further describes the County&#039;s denial of these requests on February 19, 2015, citing lack of specificity and exemption under public records laws.\" data-attachment-id=\"2397\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-78\/3051752746.png\" alt=\"A scanned legal document page titled &#039;FACTUAL BACKGROUND&#039; listing record requests from January 2015 regarding phone, internet, and email records.\" title=\"Page 2 of a legal document detailing record requests and responses between January and February 2015.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Page 2 of a legal document detailing record requests and responses between January and February 2015.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows a scanned page from a legal document titled 'FACTUAL BACKGROUND' that lists three specific record requests made on January 13, 2015. The text details demands for telephone records, internet browsing history, and email account screenshots related to the District Attorney's Office. It further describes the County's denial of these requests on February 19, 2015, citing lack of specificity and exemption under public records laws.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-79.png\" data-caption-title=\"Page of a legal document detailing appeals and right-to-know law analysis.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows a printed legal document page with text about appeals, public records exemptions, and the Right to Know Law. It includes citations to statutes and case law such as SWB Yankees L.L.C. v. Wintermantel. The footer indicates it was printed from Centre County Online Access on 6\/10\/2015.\" data-attachment-id=\"2398\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-79\/687334602.png\" alt=\"A scanned legal document page discussing appeals, public records, and Right to Know Law analysis.\" title=\"Page of a legal document detailing appeals and right-to-know law analysis.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Page of a legal document detailing appeals and right-to-know law analysis.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows a printed legal document page with text about appeals, public records exemptions, and the Right to Know Law. It includes citations to statutes and case law such as SWB Yankees L.L.C. v. Wintermantel. The footer indicates it was printed from Centre County Online Access on 6\/10\/2015.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-80.png\" data-caption-title=\"Legal text excerpt from a Pennsylvania court or administrative decision regarding open records and appeal procedures.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows page 4 of a printed legal document dated 6\/10\/2015, citing Pennsylvania statutes (65 P.S.) on appeals by the Office of Open Records (OOR), public record disclosure under the Right-to-Know Law (RTKL), and burden of proof standards. The text references cases such as Bowling v. Office of Open Records and discusses whether hearings are required for appeals.\" data-attachment-id=\"2399\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-80\/1358959533.png\" alt=\"A scanned legal document page discussing appeals authority, public records disclosure under RTKL, and burden of proof in Pennsylvania law.\" title=\"Legal text excerpt from a Pennsylvania court or administrative decision regarding open records and appeal procedures.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Legal text excerpt from a Pennsylvania court or administrative decision regarding open records and appeal procedures.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows page 4 of a printed legal document dated 6\/10\/2015, citing Pennsylvania statutes (65 P.S.) on appeals by the Office of Open Records (OOR), public record disclosure under the Right-to-Know Law (RTKL), and burden of proof standards. The text references cases such as Bowling v. Office of Open Records and discusses whether hearings are required for appeals.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-81.png\" data-caption-title=\"Page 5 of a legal brief analyzing the specificity of public records requests under Pennsylvania law.\" data-caption-desc=\"This is a scanned page from a legal document, likely a court brief or opinion, discussing the sufficiency of public records requests under the Pennsylvania Right-to-Know Law (RTKL). The text cites several cases including Pa. State Troopers Ass&#039;n v. Scolforo and Hodges v. Dep\u2019t of Health, and references statutes such as 65 P.S. \u00a7 67.703.\" data-attachment-id=\"2400\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-81\/589430960.png\" alt=\"A scanned legal document page discussing public records requests and specific case law citations.\" title=\"Page 5 of a legal brief analyzing the specificity of public records requests under Pennsylvania law.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Page 5 of a legal brief analyzing the specificity of public records requests under Pennsylvania law.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">This is a scanned page from a legal document, likely a court brief or opinion, discussing the sufficiency of public records requests under the Pennsylvania Right-to-Know Law (RTKL). The text cites several cases including Pa. State Troopers Ass'n v. Scolforo and Hodges v. Dep\u2019t of Health, and references statutes such as 65 P.S. \u00a7 67.703.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-82.png\" data-caption-title=\"Legal analysis of email record requests under Pennsylvania public records law.\" data-caption-desc=\"This is a single-page scan from a legal document (page 6) discussing the sufficiency of FOIA\/RTKL requests for emails. It references case law including Worcester, Mollick, Baxter, Melena v. Pa. Dep\u2019t of Educ., and Doerschner v. Beaver County regarding specificity requirements.\" data-attachment-id=\"2401\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-82\/346825934.png\" alt=\"A scanned legal document page discussing email request specificity under Section 703 of the RTKL, citing cases like Worcester and Baxter.\" title=\"Legal analysis of email record requests under Pennsylvania public records law.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Legal analysis of email record requests under Pennsylvania public records law.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">This is a single-page scan from a legal document (page 6) discussing the sufficiency of FOIA\/RTKL requests for emails. It references case law including Worcester, Mollick, Baxter, Melena v. Pa. Dep\u2019t of Educ., and Doerschner v. Beaver County regarding specificity requirements.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-83.png\" data-caption-title=\"Page 7 of a legal opinion regarding public records access and appeal jurisdiction.\" data-caption-desc=\"This is a single-page scan of a formal legal document, likely an appellate court opinion. The text discusses the sufficiency of public records requests, the Office of the OOR&#039;s (Office of the Records Officer) jurisdiction over appeals, and exemptions related to criminal investigations under Pennsylvania law. It cites statutes such as 65 P.S. \u00a7 67.708(b)(16) and references cases like Dep&#039;t of Environ. Prot. v. Legere.\" data-attachment-id=\"2402\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-83\/3363063478.png\" alt=\"A scanned page from a legal document discussing public records requests, jurisdiction over appeals, and criminal investigation exemptions.\" title=\"Page 7 of a legal opinion regarding public records access and appeal jurisdiction.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Page 7 of a legal opinion regarding public records access and appeal jurisdiction.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">This is a single-page scan of a formal legal document, likely an appellate court opinion. The text discusses the sufficiency of public records requests, the Office of the OOR's (Office of the Records Officer) jurisdiction over appeals, and exemptions related to criminal investigations under Pennsylvania law. It cites statutes such as 65 P.S. \u00a7 67.708(b)(16) and references cases like Dep't of Environ. Prot. v. Legere.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-84.png\" data-caption-title=\"Legal text analyzing record exemptions and public access rights.\" data-caption-desc=\"This is a scanned page from a legal document discussing records exemption under Section 708(b)(16) of the RTKL, citing cases like Mattes v. Westtown-East Goshen Regional Police Dep&#039;t. The text argues that possession by the District Attorney&#039;s Office does not make records exempt if they relate to criminal investigations.\" data-attachment-id=\"2403\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-84\/2075159602.png\" alt=\"A scanned legal document page discussing records exemption under Section 708(b)(16) of the RTKL, citing cases like Mattes v. Westtown-East Goshen Regional Police Dep&#039;t.\" title=\"Legal text analyzing record exemptions and public access rights.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Legal text analyzing record exemptions and public access rights.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">This is a scanned page from a legal document discussing records exemption under Section 708(b)(16) of the RTKL, citing cases like Mattes v. Westtown-East Goshen Regional Police Dep't. The text argues that possession by the District Attorney's Office does not make records exempt if they relate to criminal investigations.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-85.png\" data-caption-title=\"Page 9 of a legal opinion addressing public records requests and appeal procedures.\" data-caption-desc=\"This is a printed legal document page from Centre County Online Access dated June 10, 2015. It discusses exemptions from public access under Section 708(b)(16) of the RTKL, addresses an appeal by District Attorney Higgins regarding notification delays, and defines &#039;record&#039; per 65 P.S. \u00a7 67.102.\" data-attachment-id=\"2404\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-85\/788499197.png\" alt=\"A scanned legal document page discussing public access exemptions, appeals, and record definitions under the RTKL.\" title=\"Page 9 of a legal opinion addressing public records requests and appeal procedures.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Page 9 of a legal opinion addressing public records requests and appeal procedures.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">This is a printed legal document page from Centre County Online Access dated June 10, 2015. It discusses exemptions from public access under Section 708(b)(16) of the RTKL, addresses an appeal by District Attorney Higgins regarding notification delays, and defines 'record' per 65 P.S. \u00a7 67.102.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-86.png\" data-caption-title=\"Page 10 of a legal opinion analyzing record requests under the Right-to-Know Law.\" data-caption-desc=\"This is a single-page scan from a legal document, likely an appellate brief or court opinion. The text discusses the definition of &#039;record&#039; under the Pennsylvania Right-to-Know Law (RTKL) and argues that unsworn statements by county officials are not competent evidence to withhold records. It cites several Pennsylvania cases such as Sherry v. Radnor Township and Moore v. Office of Open Records.\" data-attachment-id=\"2405\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-86\/426880643.png\" alt=\"A scanned legal document page discussing record definitions under the RTKL, citing Pennsylvania court cases and statutes.\" title=\"Page 10 of a legal opinion analyzing record requests under the Right-to-Know Law.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Page 10 of a legal opinion analyzing record requests under the Right-to-Know Law.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">This is a single-page scan from a legal document, likely an appellate brief or court opinion. The text discusses the definition of 'record' under the Pennsylvania Right-to-Know Law (RTKL) and argues that unsworn statements by county officials are not competent evidence to withhold records. It cites several Pennsylvania cases such as Sherry v. Radnor Township and Moore v. Office of Open Records.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-87.png\" data-caption-title=\"Page 11 of a legal opinion addressing record exemption claims by the County and District Attorney Higgins.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows a printed legal document, likely from a court case involving Centre County Online Access. It contains two main arguments (numbered 4 and 5) regarding whether certain records are exempt or do not exist within the County\u2019s possession. Citations to Pennsylvania statutes and case law such as Van Osdol and Thomas v. Shohola Township appear throughout.\" data-attachment-id=\"2406\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-87\/3316239611.png\" alt=\"A scanned legal document page with numbered sections discussing record exemptions and possession.\" title=\"Page 11 of a legal opinion addressing record exemption claims by the County and District Attorney Higgins.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Page 11 of a legal opinion addressing record exemption claims by the County and District Attorney Higgins.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows a printed legal document, likely from a court case involving Centre County Online Access. It contains two main arguments (numbered 4 and 5) regarding whether certain records are exempt or do not exist within the County\u2019s possession. Citations to Pennsylvania statutes and case law such as Van Osdol and Thomas v. Shohola Township appear throughout.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-88.png\" data-caption-title=\"Page 12 of a legal determination document dated April 29, 2015, concluding an appeal process.\" data-caption-desc=\"This is page 12 of a formal legal document titled &#039;CONCLUSION&#039;, stating that the Requester&#039;s appeal is granted and outlining procedures for further appeals to the Bedford County Court of Common Pleas. It includes a signature line signed by Joshua T. Young, Esq., Appeals Officer, and lists recipients via e-mail only.\" data-attachment-id=\"2407\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-88\/2777218506.png\" alt=\"A scanned legal document page titled &#039;CONCLUSION&#039; with text about an appeal being granted, a signature line for Joshua T. Young, Esq., and recipient names.\" title=\"Page 12 of a legal determination document dated April 29, 2015, concluding an appeal process.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Page 12 of a legal determination document dated April 29, 2015, concluding an appeal process.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">This is page 12 of a formal legal document titled 'CONCLUSION', stating that the Requester's appeal is granted and outlining procedures for further appeals to the Bedford County Court of Common Pleas. It includes a signature line signed by Joshua T. Young, Esq., Appeals Officer, and lists recipients via e-mail only.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-89.png\" data-caption-title=\"Exhibit 7 document page.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows a single-page document titled &#039;EXHIBIT 7&#039; in bold, centered, uppercase serif typeface. At the bottom left, small text indicates it was printed from Centre County Online Access on 6\/10\/2015 at 4:12:08 PM.\" data-attachment-id=\"2408\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-89\/949556266.png\" alt=\"A white document page with the text &#039;EXHIBIT 7&#039; centered in large black serif font and a footer note about printing from Centre County Online Access.\" title=\"Exhibit 7 document page.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Exhibit 7 document page.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows a single-page document titled 'EXHIBIT 7' in bold, centered, uppercase serif typeface. At the bottom left, small text indicates it was printed from Centre County Online Access on 6\/10\/2015 at 4:12:08 PM.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-90.png\" data-caption-title=\"Commissioners discuss cell phone policy changes following a court ruling.\" data-caption-desc=\"A scanned document page titled &#039;Commissioners Upset by Judge&#039;s Ruling Against the County, May Change Cell Phone Policy&#039; from State College, PA. It includes an embedded photo of three men in suits seated at a table with framed art on the wall behind them.\" data-attachment-id=\"2409\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-90\/2309765343.png\" alt=\"Three men in suits sitting at a table with framed artwork behind them\" title=\"Commissioners discuss cell phone policy changes following a court ruling.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Commissioners discuss cell phone policy changes following a court ruling.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">A scanned document page titled 'Commissioners Upset by Judge's Ruling Against the County, May Change Cell Phone Policy' from State College, PA. It includes an embedded photo of three men in suits seated at a table with framed art on the wall behind them.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-91.png\" data-caption-title=\"Printed news article from State College.com dated June 8, 2015, covering legal disputes and local stories.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows a two-page printout of an online news article titled &#039;Commissioners Upset by Judge&#039;s Ruling Against the County,&#039; featuring quotes, legal context about cell phone records, and a section labeled &#039;POPULAR STORIES&#039; with underlined headlines. The footer includes copyright notice for StateCollege.com (2015), URL links, and print metadata indicating it was generated on 6\/10\/2015 at 4:12:08 PM.\" data-attachment-id=\"2410\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-91\/3126786601.png\" alt=\"A printed news article page discussing legal actions against a county, including quotes and headlines about ATM fraud, lighting debates, Penn State football, and missing students.\" title=\"Printed news article from State College.com dated June 8, 2015, covering legal disputes and local stories.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Printed news article from State College.com dated June 8, 2015, covering legal disputes and local stories.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows a two-page printout of an online news article titled 'Commissioners Upset by Judge's Ruling Against the County,' featuring quotes, legal context about cell phone records, and a section labeled 'POPULAR STORIES' with underlined headlines. The footer includes copyright notice for StateCollege.com (2015), URL links, and print metadata indicating it was generated on 6\/10\/2015 at 4:12:08 PM.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-92.png\" data-caption-title=\"Exhibit 8 document page.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows a single-page document titled &#039;EXHIBIT 8&#039; in bold, centered, uppercase serif typeface. At the bottom left, small print indicates it was printed from Centre County Online Access on 6\/10\/2015 at 4:12:08 PM.\" data-attachment-id=\"2411\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-92\/2379275863.png\" alt=\"A white page with the text &#039;EXHIBIT 8&#039; centered in large black serif font and a footer note about printing from Centre County Online Access.\" title=\"Exhibit 8 document page.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Exhibit 8 document page.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows a single-page document titled 'EXHIBIT 8' in bold, centered, uppercase serif typeface. At the bottom left, small print indicates it was printed from Centre County Online Access on 6\/10\/2015 at 4:12:08 PM.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-93.png\" data-caption-title=\"Newspaper article on Centre County&#039;s appeal of Right to Know lawsuit decisions.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows a printed newspaper article dated May 19, 2015, discussing Centre County officials&#039; plan to appeal recent Right to Know rulings. A small photograph in the upper right corner depicts three men seated at a table with a framed picture behind them; no oversized bank check is visible.\" data-attachment-id=\"2412\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-93\/1359526959.png\" alt=\"A newspaper article about Centre County officials appealing Right to Know lawsuit rulings, featuring a photo of three men at a table.\" title=\"Newspaper article on Centre County&#039;s appeal of Right to Know lawsuit decisions.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Newspaper article on Centre County's appeal of Right to Know lawsuit decisions.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows a printed newspaper article dated May 19, 2015, discussing Centre County officials' plan to appeal recent Right to Know rulings. A small photograph in the upper right corner depicts three men seated at a table with a framed picture behind them; no oversized bank check is visible.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-94.png\" data-caption-title=\"Printed news article from StateCollege.com about Centre County administrative and policy decisions.\" data-caption-desc=\"This is a scanned printout of a news article from StateCollege.com dated June 9, 2015. The main text discusses county administrator Tim Boyde\u2019s interaction with Judge Tom Kistler regarding a proposal, followed by a vote to review cell phone policies. Below the article are underlined headlines for popular stories including one about Christopher Lee\u2019s child sex abuse trial delay. A disclaimer and URL appear at the bottom.\" data-attachment-id=\"2413\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSanctions-94\/3805058731.png\" alt=\"A printed news article page from StateCollege.com dated 6\/9\/2015 discussing Centre County decisions on right to know suits, with popular stories listed below.\" title=\"Printed news article from StateCollege.com about Centre County administrative and policy decisions.\" width=\"320\" height=\"480\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Printed news article from StateCollege.com about Centre County administrative and policy decisions.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">This is a scanned printout of a news article from StateCollege.com dated June 9, 2015. The main text discusses county administrator Tim Boyde\u2019s interaction with Judge Tom Kistler regarding a proposal, followed by a vote to review cell phone policies. Below the article are underlined headlines for popular stories including one about Christopher Lee\u2019s child sex abuse trial delay. A disclaimer and URL appear at the bottom.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div>\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<div class=\"fiv-ctrls\">\n\t\t\t<button type=\"button\" class=\"fiv-prev\" title=\"Prev\"><span>Prev<\/span><\/button>\n\t\t\t<label class=\"fiv-count\"><span class=\"fiv-count-current\">1<\/span>of<span class=\"fiv-count-total\">94<\/span><\/label>\n\t\t\t<button type=\"button\" class=\"fiv-next\" title=\"Next\"><span>Next<\/span><\/button>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n<p>The district attorney, Stacy Parks Miller, sued Judge Ruest and many county commissioners, including Ava&#8217;s ex-husband. The portion of the lawsuit against Judge Ruest stemmed from an incident in which an inmate I met, Ryan Richard, apparently asked his cellmate, who thought he would be released soon, to hire a hitman to kill someone in the district attorney&#8217;s office he got out. The cellmate reported this to the district attorney for, I assume, some leniency. Parks Miller wrote a fake order for the cellmate to show Ryan that the cellmate was indeed getting out. Needing a judge&#8217;s signature on the document, she either had Judge Ruest sign it or forged her signature. Handwriting experts later determined that the signature was likely not forged. However, Judge Ruest did not recall signing it; the cellmate was accidentally released and wound up back in Pam&#8217;s courtroom. This fiasco looked very bad for Parks Miller, who I suspect slipped the order into a stack of documents Judge Ruest needed to sign, knowing, as I&#8217;ve mentioned previously, that she doesn&#8217;t take the time to read the things she signs. Parks Miller was facing some serious charges of forgery, but the court eventually dismissed them. However, she decided to sue Judge Ruest for lying about having no recollection of signing the order, implicitly suggesting Parks Miller had forged her signature. Someone that had worked in the DA&#8217;s office also claimed that Parks Miller had forged the signature. If these forgery allegations were false, Parks Miller should be very mindful of false claims and how they can affect the accused&#8217;s life.<\/p>\r\n<p>I have included the 60-page lawsuit and the 94-page request for sanctions in image galleries. While these documents are written in boring legalese, they are pretty entertaining to read, and the majority of the pages are exhibits, most of which are also quite fascinating. Both orders were submitted to the court by Parks Miller&#8217;s attorney, Bruce Castor. However, I suspect both were written primarily by Parks Miller, as they appear to be very personal and a bit deranged. If the name Bruce Castor sounds familiar, that&#8217;s because he was one of the attorneys willing to represent Donald Trump at his second impeachment trial. Most people thought his initial address to congress was a disaster, and another attorney did all subsequent speaking. He will come up again as Parks Miller&#8217;s attorney later in the book.<\/p>\r\n<p>Parks Miller was also suing the county supervisors and asking that the county be held in contempt of court because they released some of the text messages she had sent using a county-issued phone after receiving a Freedom of Information Act request. The courts later determined that the supervisors should not have released the text messages. However, the messages revealed that Parks Miller had been texting Judge Lunsford during a trial in which both participated. This clear violation of court rules did not sit well in the community. Parks Miller&#8217;s defense to the public was that her &#8220;tough on crime&#8221; tactics upset defense attorneys who were being vindictive.<\/p>\r\n<p>In Parks Miller&#8217;s lawsuit, the county supervisors used a defense of &#8220;high public official immunity,&#8221; which states that people cannot sue public officials for defamation for acts done while performing their duties as public officials. I will discuss this later when explaining the lawsuit I filed against Parks Miller, who used the same defense. You can read more about Parks Miller <a href=\"https:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20211020214721\/https:\/\/alleghenygazette.wordpress.com\/2018\/09\/14\/stacy-parks-miller-social-media-meltdown\/\">here<\/a>.<\/p><p><!--nextpage--><\/p><audio class=\"wp-audio-shortcode\" id=\"audio-353-2\" preload=\"none\" style=\"width: 100%;\" controls=\"controls\"><source type=\"audio\/mpeg\" src=\"https:\/\/unstablefocus.mynetgear.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/Intermission-353-P02.mp3?_=2\" \/><a href=\"https:\/\/unstablefocus.mynetgear.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/Intermission-353-P02.mp3\">https:\/\/unstablefocus.mynetgear.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/Intermission-353-P02.mp3<\/a><\/audio>\r\n<div style=\"display: flex; float: right; width: 400px; padding-left: 10pt;\">\r\n<style type=\"text\/css\">\n#foogallery-gallery-2189 .fg-image { width: 640px; }<\/style>\n\t\t\t<div class=\"foogallery foogallery-container foogallery-image-viewer foogallery-link-image foogallery-lightbox-foobox fg-center fg-image-viewer fg-ready fg-dark fg-border-thin fg-shadow-outline fg-loading-default fg-loaded-fade-in fg-caption-hover fg-hover-fade fg-hover-zoom fg-no-js\" id=\"foogallery-gallery-2189\" data-foogallery=\"{&quot;item&quot;:{&quot;showCaptionTitle&quot;:true,&quot;showCaptionDescription&quot;:true},&quot;lazy&quot;:true,&quot;src&quot;:&quot;src&quot;,&quot;srcset&quot;:&quot;srcset&quot;,&quot;template&quot;:{&quot;loop&quot;:true,&quot;autoplay&quot;:0}}\" style=\"--fg-title-line-clamp: 0; --fg-description-line-clamp: 0;\" >\n\t<div class=\"fiv-inner\">\n\t\t<div class=\"fiv-inner-container\">\n\t\t\t<div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/GrineConduct-1.jpg\" data-caption-title=\"Press release announcing a Letter of Counsel issued to Judge Jonathan D. Grine by the Pennsylvania Judicial Conduct Board.\" data-caption-desc=\"This is a scanned press release document from the Judicial Conduct Board of Pennsylvania, dated August 29, 2017. It details an investigation into conduct between Judge Jonathan D. Grine and District Attorney Stacy Parks Miller in 2014, resulting in a non-chargeable resolution via Letter of Counsel.\" data-attachment-id=\"2185\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/GrineConduct-1\/462970835.jpg\" alt=\"A press release from the Judicial Conduct Board of Pennsylvania dated August 29, 2017, regarding Judge Jonathan D. Grine and Complaint No. 2016-721.\" title=\"Press release announcing a Letter of Counsel issued to Judge Jonathan D. Grine by the Pennsylvania Judicial Conduct Board.\" width=\"640\" height=\"640\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Press release announcing a Letter of Counsel issued to Judge Jonathan D. Grine by the Pennsylvania Judicial Conduct Board.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">This is a scanned press release document from the Judicial Conduct Board of Pennsylvania, dated August 29, 2017. It details an investigation into conduct between Judge Jonathan D. Grine and District Attorney Stacy Parks Miller in 2014, resulting in a non-chargeable resolution via Letter of Counsel.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/GrineConduct-2.jpg\" data-caption-title=\"Official letter from the Pennsylvania Judicial Conduct Board to Judge Grine concerning a conduct complaint.\" data-caption-desc=\"This is a scanned document of a formal letter issued by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Judicial Conduct Board on August 10, 2017. The letter addresses Honorable Jonathan D. Grine regarding JCB Complaint No. 2016-721 and discusses the issuance of a &#039;Letter of Counsel&#039; as a resolution to the complaint.\" data-attachment-id=\"2186\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/GrineConduct-2\/30467019.jpg\" alt=\"A formal letter from the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Judicial Conduct Board dated August 10, 2017, addressed to Honorable Jonathan D. Grine regarding JCB Complaint No. 2016-721.\" title=\"Official letter from the Pennsylvania Judicial Conduct Board to Judge Grine concerning a conduct complaint.\" width=\"640\" height=\"640\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Official letter from the Pennsylvania Judicial Conduct Board to Judge Grine concerning a conduct complaint.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">This is a scanned document of a formal letter issued by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Judicial Conduct Board on August 10, 2017. The letter addresses Honorable Jonathan D. Grine regarding JCB Complaint No. 2016-721 and discusses the issuance of a 'Letter of Counsel' as a resolution to the complaint.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/GrineConduct-3.jpg\" data-caption-title=\"Page 2 of 7 from a legal opinion regarding Judge Grine&#039;s conduct.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows page 2 of a 7-page legal document dated August 10, 2017, addressed to Honorable Jonathan D. Grine. It details allegations about his personal support relationship with District Attorney Parks Miller and cites violations of Canon 1 and Rules 1.1 and 1.2 of the Code of Judicial Conduct.\" data-attachment-id=\"2187\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/GrineConduct-3\/135755715.jpg\" alt=\"A scanned page from a legal document dated August 10, 2017, discussing Judge Jonathan D. Grine\u2019s support relationship with DA Parks Miller and violations of judicial conduct.\" title=\"Page 2 of 7 from a legal opinion regarding Judge Grine&#039;s conduct.\" width=\"640\" height=\"640\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Page 2 of 7 from a legal opinion regarding Judge Grine's conduct.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows page 2 of a 7-page legal document dated August 10, 2017, addressed to Honorable Jonathan D. Grine. It details allegations about his personal support relationship with District Attorney Parks Miller and cites violations of Canon 1 and Rules 1.1 and 1.2 of the Code of Judicial Conduct.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/GrineConduct-4.jpg\" data-caption-title=\"Page of a legal document outlining judicial conduct standards.\" data-caption-desc=\"This is page 3 of 7 from a document dated August 10, 2017, addressed to Honorable Jonathan D. Grine. It contains text excerpts from Canon 2 regarding impartiality and Rule 2.4 on external influences, followed by Rule 2.11 on disqualification circumstances, and Canon 3 governing extrajudicial activities.\" data-attachment-id=\"2188\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/GrineConduct-4\/2828541966.jpg\" alt=\"A scanned page from a legal document detailing judicial conduct rules for Judge Jonathan D. Grine, including Canon 2 and Canon 3 with specific rules on external influences, disqual\" title=\"Page of a legal document outlining judicial conduct standards.\" width=\"640\" height=\"640\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Page of a legal document outlining judicial conduct standards.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">This is page 3 of 7 from a document dated August 10, 2017, addressed to Honorable Jonathan D. Grine. It contains text excerpts from Canon 2 regarding impartiality and Rule 2.4 on external influences, followed by Rule 2.11 on disqualification circumstances, and Canon 3 governing extrajudicial activities.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/GrineConduct-5.jpg\" data-caption-title=\"Page 4 of a formal letter regarding judicial ethics and complaint resolution for Judge Jonathan D. Grine.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows a printed legal document dated August 10, 2017, addressed to Honorable Jonathan D. Grine. It references Article V, \u00a7 17(b) of the Pennsylvania Constitution and discusses judicial conduct constraints, including relationships with attorneys. The text outlines procedures for resolving a complaint through acceptance of a Letter of Counsel.\" data-attachment-id=\"2190\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/GrineConduct-5\/3762471040.jpg\" alt=\"A scanned legal document page addressed to Honorable Jonathan D. Grine discussing judicial conduct and disciplinary resolution.\" title=\"Page 4 of a formal letter regarding judicial ethics and complaint resolution for Judge Jonathan D. Grine.\" width=\"640\" height=\"640\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Page 4 of a formal letter regarding judicial ethics and complaint resolution for Judge Jonathan D. Grine.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows a printed legal document dated August 10, 2017, addressed to Honorable Jonathan D. Grine. It references Article V, \u00a7 17(b) of the Pennsylvania Constitution and discusses judicial conduct constraints, including relationships with attorneys. The text outlines procedures for resolving a complaint through acceptance of a Letter of Counsel.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/GrineConduct-6.jpg\" data-caption-title=\"Page 5 of a 7-page letter dated August 10, 2017, from Robert A. Graci to Honorable Jonathan D. Grine.\" data-caption-desc=\"This is page 5 of a 7-page document dated August 10, 2017, addressed to Honorable Jonathan D. Grine. It includes a closing statement about scheduling a meeting by August 25, 2017, a signature from Robert A. Graci, Chief Counsel, and an attachment note referencing UPS Overnight Delivery with tracking number 1Z Y4X 745 01 9593 1926.\" data-attachment-id=\"2191\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/GrineConduct-6\/2879411189.jpg\" alt=\"A scanned page from a legal letter dated August 10, 2017, addressed to Honorable Jonathan D. Grine, signed by Robert A. Graci, Chief Counsel, with UPS tracking information listed a\" title=\"Page 5 of a 7-page letter dated August 10, 2017, from Robert A. Graci to Honorable Jonathan D. Grine.\" width=\"640\" height=\"640\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Page 5 of a 7-page letter dated August 10, 2017, from Robert A. Graci to Honorable Jonathan D. Grine.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">This is page 5 of a 7-page document dated August 10, 2017, addressed to Honorable Jonathan D. Grine. It includes a closing statement about scheduling a meeting by August 25, 2017, a signature from Robert A. Graci, Chief Counsel, and an attachment note referencing UPS Overnight Delivery with tracking number 1Z Y4X 745 01 9593 1926.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/GrineConduct-7.jpg\" data-caption-title=\"Jonathan D. Grine signs a consent form regarding the dismissal of Complaint Number 2016-721.\" data-caption-desc=\"This is page 6 of 7 of a legal document dated August 10, 2017, titled &#039;CONSENT&#039;. It contains a typed statement where Jonathan D. Grine consents to the dismissal of Complaint Number 2016-721 and agrees that contents may be used in future proceedings before the Board, Court of Judicial Discipline, or Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. The page includes a handwritten date (8\/25\/17) and signature below his typed name and title.\" data-attachment-id=\"2192\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/GrineConduct-7\/4090357904.jpg\" alt=\"A scanned legal consent form signed by Jonathan D. Grine, Judge of the Court of Common Pleas Centre County, consenting to dismissal of Complaint Number 2016-721.\" title=\"Jonathan D. Grine signs a consent form regarding the dismissal of Complaint Number 2016-721.\" width=\"640\" height=\"640\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Jonathan D. Grine signs a consent form regarding the dismissal of Complaint Number 2016-721.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">This is page 6 of 7 of a legal document dated August 10, 2017, titled 'CONSENT'. It contains a typed statement where Jonathan D. Grine consents to the dismissal of Complaint Number 2016-721 and agrees that contents may be used in future proceedings before the Board, Court of Judicial Discipline, or Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. The page includes a handwritten date (8\/25\/17) and signature below his typed name and title.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/GrineConduct-8.jpg\" data-caption-title=\"Jonathan D. Grine signs a confidentiality waiver related to a Judicial Conduct Board complaint.\" data-caption-desc=\"This is page 7 of 7 of a legal document titled &#039;WAIVER OF CONFIDENTIALITY&#039; addressed to Honorable Jonathan D. Grine, dated August 10, 2017. The text details the waiver of confidentiality provisions regarding judicial conduct complaints and includes a handwritten signature and date (8\/29\/17) at the bottom.\" data-attachment-id=\"2193\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/GrineConduct-8\/4018171562.jpg\" alt=\"A scanned legal waiver document signed by Jonathan D. Grine, Judge of the Court of Common Pleas of Centre County, dated August 29, 2017.\" title=\"Jonathan D. Grine signs a confidentiality waiver related to a Judicial Conduct Board complaint.\" width=\"640\" height=\"640\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Jonathan D. Grine signs a confidentiality waiver related to a Judicial Conduct Board complaint.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">This is page 7 of 7 of a legal document titled 'WAIVER OF CONFIDENTIALITY' addressed to Honorable Jonathan D. Grine, dated August 10, 2017. The text details the waiver of confidentiality provisions regarding judicial conduct complaints and includes a handwritten signature and date (8\/29\/17) at the bottom.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div>\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<div class=\"fiv-ctrls\">\n\t\t\t<button type=\"button\" class=\"fiv-prev\" title=\"Prev\"><span>Prev<\/span><\/button>\n\t\t\t<label class=\"fiv-count\"><span class=\"fiv-count-current\">1<\/span>of<span class=\"fiv-count-total\">8<\/span><\/label>\n\t\t\t<button type=\"button\" class=\"fiv-next\" title=\"Next\"><span>Next<\/span><\/button>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n<p>Not only did Judge Lunsford retire early and have his bid to become an appeals court judge stall, but the Judicial Conduct Board counseled Judge Grine for having an &#8220;inappropriate relationship&#8221; with Parks Miller during this period; see the image gallery below. The remaining judge during this time, President Judge Thomas Kistler, had his plans to become a senior judge ruined when the police caught him driving under the influence of alcohol shortly after he retired. He then violated his probation by drinking alcohol at a crowded local restaurant, thinking he was above the rules.<\/p>\r\n<div style=\"display: flex; float: right; width: 400px; padding-left: 10pt;\">\r\n<style type=\"text\/css\">\n#foogallery-gallery-2176 .fg-image { width: 640px; }<\/style>\n\t\t\t<div class=\"foogallery foogallery-container foogallery-image-viewer foogallery-link-image foogallery-lightbox-foobox fg-center fg-image-viewer fg-ready fg-dark fg-border-thin fg-shadow-outline fg-loading-default fg-loaded-fade-in fg-caption-hover fg-hover-fade fg-hover-zoom fg-no-js\" id=\"foogallery-gallery-2176\" data-foogallery=\"{&quot;item&quot;:{&quot;showCaptionTitle&quot;:true,&quot;showCaptionDescription&quot;:true},&quot;lazy&quot;:true,&quot;src&quot;:&quot;src&quot;,&quot;srcset&quot;:&quot;srcset&quot;,&quot;template&quot;:{&quot;loop&quot;:true,&quot;autoplay&quot;:0}}\" style=\"--fg-title-line-clamp: 0; --fg-description-line-clamp: 0;\" >\n\t<div class=\"fiv-inner\">\n\t\t<div class=\"fiv-inner-container\">\n\t\t\t<div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerRecommendation-01.png\" data-caption-title=\"Hearing committee report recommending discipline for a Pennsylvania attorney.\" data-caption-desc=\"This is a one-page scanned legal document from the Office of Disciplinary Counsel of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. It outlines a case involving Stacy Parks Miller, who served as District Attorney of Centre County, and details allegations of ex parte communications with judges and use of a fictitious Facebook page. The document includes a summary of case findings recommending a three-month license suspension.\" data-attachment-id=\"2246\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerRecommendation-01\/3471878501.png\" alt=\"A scanned legal document titled &#039;Report of Hearing Committee&#039; from the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania regarding Stacy Parks Miller.\" title=\"Hearing committee report recommending discipline for a Pennsylvania attorney.\" width=\"640\" height=\"640\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Hearing committee report recommending discipline for a Pennsylvania attorney.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">This is a one-page scanned legal document from the Office of Disciplinary Counsel of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. It outlines a case involving Stacy Parks Miller, who served as District Attorney of Centre County, and details allegations of ex parte communications with judges and use of a fictitious Facebook page. The document includes a summary of case findings recommending a three-month license suspension.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerRecommendation-02.png\" data-caption-title=\"Page 2 of a disciplinary recommendation document outlining Rule violations.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows a printed page from a legal document, specifically Page 2, which details allegations under the Pennsylvania Rules of Professional Conduct. It lists six specific rule violations (A through F) related to ex parte communications and dishonesty in a disciplinary matter involving a District Attorney.\" data-attachment-id=\"2247\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerRecommendation-02\/366304309.png\" alt=\"A scanned page of a legal document listing Rules of Professional Conduct violations.\" title=\"Page 2 of a disciplinary recommendation document outlining Rule violations.\" width=\"640\" height=\"640\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Page 2 of a disciplinary recommendation document outlining Rule violations.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows a printed page from a legal document, specifically Page 2, which details allegations under the Pennsylvania Rules of Professional Conduct. It lists six specific rule violations (A through F) related to ex parte communications and dishonesty in a disciplinary matter involving a District Attorney.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerRecommendation-03.png\" data-caption-title=\"Page 3 of a legal document detailing procedural rulings and evidence admission in a Pennsylvania Supreme Court discipline case.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows a printed legal document titled &#039;ABSTRACT OF EVIDENCE&#039; with sections on professional misconduct under Pa.R.P.C. 8.4(d) and (f). It outlines timeline events from February to August 2017 regarding a Petition for Discipline filed against a Respondent, including motions for protective order and admission of allegations.\" data-attachment-id=\"2248\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerRecommendation-03\/1788745896.png\" alt=\"A scanned legal document page showing text about professional misconduct rules and abstract of evidence in a Pennsylvania Supreme Court disciplinary case.\" title=\"Page 3 of a legal document detailing procedural rulings and evidence admission in a Pennsylvania Supreme Court discipline case.\" width=\"640\" height=\"640\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Page 3 of a legal document detailing procedural rulings and evidence admission in a Pennsylvania Supreme Court discipline case.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows a printed legal document titled 'ABSTRACT OF EVIDENCE' with sections on professional misconduct under Pa.R.P.C. 8.4(d) and (f). It outlines timeline events from February to August 2017 regarding a Petition for Discipline filed against a Respondent, including motions for protective order and admission of allegations.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerRecommendation-04.png\" data-caption-title=\"Page 4 of a legal document detailing findings of fact in a disciplinary proceeding.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows a printed legal document, specifically page 4, under the heading &#039;IV. FINDINGS OF FACT&#039;. It includes five numbered factual statements regarding a petitioner and respondent, with footnotes citing court records and grand jury reports.\" data-attachment-id=\"2249\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerRecommendation-04\/905044738.png\" alt=\"A scanned legal document page titled &#039;FINDINGS OF FACT&#039; containing numbered paragraphs and footnotes.\" title=\"Page 4 of a legal document detailing findings of fact in a disciplinary proceeding.\" width=\"640\" height=\"640\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Page 4 of a legal document detailing findings of fact in a disciplinary proceeding.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows a printed legal document, specifically page 4, under the heading 'IV. FINDINGS OF FACT'. It includes five numbered factual statements regarding a petitioner and respondent, with footnotes citing court records and grand jury reports.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerRecommendation-05.png\" data-caption-title=\"Page 5 of a legal recommendation document detailing allegations against a respondent regarding communications with judges.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows a single page from a formal legal document, likely a recommendation or finding, containing numbered paragraphs (6 through 16) that discuss misconduct involving ex parte communications and text messages. The text references specific individuals such as Judge Grine and Judge Lunsford, and cites court records like J.S. \u00b6\u00b6 and N.T. citations.\" data-attachment-id=\"2250\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerRecommendation-05\/1040762544.png\" alt=\"A scanned legal document page with numbered paragraphs discussing judicial misconduct, ex parte communications, and text message evidence.\" title=\"Page 5 of a legal recommendation document detailing allegations against a respondent regarding communications with judges.\" width=\"640\" height=\"640\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Page 5 of a legal recommendation document detailing allegations against a respondent regarding communications with judges.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows a single page from a formal legal document, likely a recommendation or finding, containing numbered paragraphs (6 through 16) that discuss misconduct involving ex parte communications and text messages. The text references specific individuals such as Judge Grine and Judge Lunsford, and cites court records like J.S. \u00b6\u00b6 and N.T. citations.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerRecommendation-06.png\" data-caption-title=\"Page 6 of a legal document detailing correspondence between Respondent and Judge Lunsford.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows a single page from a legal filing containing numbered paragraphs (17\u201326) that describe email exchanges involving defense counsel, an inmate named Patrick Horan, and text message communications with judges. Citations to court records appear in parentheses at the end of several paragraphs.\" data-attachment-id=\"2251\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerRecommendation-06\/3844944864.png\" alt=\"A scanned legal document page with numbered paragraphs discussing email communications, ex parte contacts, and court hearings.\" title=\"Page 6 of a legal document detailing correspondence between Respondent and Judge Lunsford.\" width=\"640\" height=\"640\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Page 6 of a legal document detailing correspondence between Respondent and Judge Lunsford.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows a single page from a legal filing containing numbered paragraphs (17\u201326) that describe email exchanges involving defense counsel, an inmate named Patrick Horan, and text message communications with judges. Citations to court records appear in parentheses at the end of several paragraphs.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerRecommendation-07.png\" data-caption-title=\"Page 7 of a legal document detailing communications with judges and related case matters.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image displays a single page from a legal filing or brief, containing numbered paragraphs that reference specific court records (N.T.) and judicial opinions (J.S.). The text discusses text messages sent to judges regarding criminal cases, jokes made in an office setting, and the creation of a fictitious Facebook page. It also mentions legislation concerning bath salts.\" data-attachment-id=\"2252\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerRecommendation-07\/3614975147.png\" alt=\"A scanned legal document page showing numbered paragraphs discussing text messages to judges, criminal cases, and a Facebook page.\" title=\"Page 7 of a legal document detailing communications with judges and related case matters.\" width=\"640\" height=\"640\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Page 7 of a legal document detailing communications with judges and related case matters.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image displays a single page from a legal filing or brief, containing numbered paragraphs that reference specific court records (N.T.) and judicial opinions (J.S.). The text discusses text messages sent to judges regarding criminal cases, jokes made in an office setting, and the creation of a fictitious Facebook page. It also mentions legislation concerning bath salts.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerRecommendation-08.png\" data-caption-title=\"Legal text describing the creation and use of a fake Facebook page by law enforcement.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows a scanned page (Page 8) of a legal document with numbered paragraphs from 38 to 47. The text discusses how a Respondent created a fictitious Facebook page to track stores selling illegal bath salts, including details about friend requests, police involvement, and subsequent raids.\" data-attachment-id=\"2253\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerRecommendation-08\/1542636724.png\" alt=\"A page from a legal document containing numbered paragraphs discussing the use of a fictitious Facebook page for law enforcement purposes.\" title=\"Legal text describing the creation and use of a fake Facebook page by law enforcement.\" width=\"640\" height=\"640\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Legal text describing the creation and use of a fake Facebook page by law enforcement.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows a scanned page (Page 8) of a legal document with numbered paragraphs from 38 to 47. The text discusses how a Respondent created a fictitious Facebook page to track stores selling illegal bath salts, including details about friend requests, police involvement, and subsequent raids.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerRecommendation-09.png\" data-caption-title=\"Page 9 of a legal recommendation document detailing professional conduct and character references.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows a single page from a legal document with numbered paragraphs (48\u201360) describing the respondent&#039;s professional behavior, discipline history, and endorsements from colleagues. The text includes citations to court records and mentions individuals such as Thomas R. Kline, Kristin Ann Shirey, Jeffrey S. Helffrich, and William A. Shaw, Jr., Esquire.\" data-attachment-id=\"2254\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerRecommendation-09\/3833405298.png\" alt=\"A scanned page from a legal document showing numbered paragraphs discussing professional conduct, character references, and employment history.\" title=\"Page 9 of a legal recommendation document detailing professional conduct and character references.\" width=\"640\" height=\"640\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Page 9 of a legal recommendation document detailing professional conduct and character references.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows a single page from a legal document with numbered paragraphs (48\u201360) describing the respondent's professional behavior, discipline history, and endorsements from colleagues. The text includes citations to court records and mentions individuals such as Thomas R. Kline, Kristin Ann Shirey, Jeffrey S. Helffrich, and William A. Shaw, Jr., Esquire.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerRecommendation-10.png\" data-caption-title=\"Page 10 of a legal opinion detailing violations of professional conduct rules.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows a printed page from a legal document, specifically page 10, containing numbered paragraphs and a section titled &#039;V. DISCUSSION&#039;. The text references cases involving judges like Lunsford and Grine, mentions specific Rules of Professional Conduct (R.P.C.), and discusses ethical misconduct related to ex parte communications.\" data-attachment-id=\"2255\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerRecommendation-10\/3118719657.png\" alt=\"A scanned page from a legal document discussing ex parte communications and Rules of Professional Conduct.\" title=\"Page 10 of a legal opinion detailing violations of professional conduct rules.\" width=\"640\" height=\"640\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Page 10 of a legal opinion detailing violations of professional conduct rules.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows a printed page from a legal document, specifically page 10, containing numbered paragraphs and a section titled 'V. DISCUSSION'. The text references cases involving judges like Lunsford and Grine, mentions specific Rules of Professional Conduct (R.P.C.), and discusses ethical misconduct related to ex parte communications.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerRecommendation-11.png\" data-caption-title=\"Page 11 of a legal recommendation document detailing alleged rule violations.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows a printed page (labeled Page 11) from a formal legal document discussing professional misconduct allegations against a lawyer named Respondent. The text references specific rules such as R.P.C. 8.4(d), 8.4(f), and 8.1(a) regarding conduct prejudicial to justice, false statements, and ex parte communications.\" data-attachment-id=\"2256\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerRecommendation-11\/2344023522.png\" alt=\"A scanned page from a legal document discussing professional misconduct violations by a lawyer, citing R.P.C. rules regarding ex parte communications and false statements.\" title=\"Page 11 of a legal recommendation document detailing alleged rule violations.\" width=\"640\" height=\"640\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Page 11 of a legal recommendation document detailing alleged rule violations.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows a printed page (labeled Page 11) from a formal legal document discussing professional misconduct allegations against a lawyer named Respondent. The text references specific rules such as R.P.C. 8.4(d), 8.4(f), and 8.1(a) regarding conduct prejudicial to justice, false statements, and ex parte communications.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerRecommendation-12.png\" data-caption-title=\"Page 12 of a legal recommendation detailing Rule of Professional Conduct violations.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows a printed page titled &#039;VI. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW&#039; from a formal legal document, likely a disciplinary report or committee finding. It lists four specific Rules of Professional Conduct that were violated by the Respondent, including prohibitions on influencing judges and communicating ex parte.\" data-attachment-id=\"2257\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerRecommendation-12\/1351811250.png\" alt=\"A scanned page from a legal document discussing professional conduct violations and listing specific rules.\" title=\"Page 12 of a legal recommendation detailing Rule of Professional Conduct violations.\" width=\"640\" height=\"640\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Page 12 of a legal recommendation detailing Rule of Professional Conduct violations.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows a printed page titled 'VI. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW' from a formal legal document, likely a disciplinary report or committee finding. It lists four specific Rules of Professional Conduct that were violated by the Respondent, including prohibitions on influencing judges and communicating ex parte.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerRecommendation-13.png\" data-caption-title=\"Page 13 of a disciplinary board report recommending a three-month license suspension.\" data-caption-desc=\"This is a scanned page from a legal document titled &#039;Report of Hearing Committee&#039; for Stacy Parks Miller. It lists two rules of professional conduct regarding judicial misconduct, recommends suspending the respondent&#039;s law license for three months effective upon adoption, and includes signatures from Joanne Ludwikowski (Chair), Kevin McNamara (Member), and Seth Mosebey (Member). The file path at the bottom indicates it was saved as &#039;ParksMillerRecommendation-13&#039;.\" data-attachment-id=\"2258\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerRecommendation-13\/802702383.png\" alt=\"A scanned legal document page showing recommended disposition of a license suspension, signatures of committee members, and file path at bottom.\" title=\"Page 13 of a disciplinary board report recommending a three-month license suspension.\" width=\"640\" height=\"640\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Page 13 of a disciplinary board report recommending a three-month license suspension.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">This is a scanned page from a legal document titled 'Report of Hearing Committee' for Stacy Parks Miller. It lists two rules of professional conduct regarding judicial misconduct, recommends suspending the respondent's law license for three months effective upon adoption, and includes signatures from Joanne Ludwikowski (Chair), Kevin McNamara (Member), and Seth Mosebey (Member). The file path at the bottom indicates it was saved as 'ParksMillerRecommendation-13'.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSuspensionOrder-01.png\" data-caption-title=\"Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Order suspending Stacy Parks Miller from the Bar.\" data-caption-desc=\"This is a scanned legal document titled &#039;ORDER&#039; issued by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. It details that Stacy Parks Miller was suspended from the Bar for one year and one day, effective as of February 8, 2019, following recommendations from the Disciplinary Board. The document includes case numbers, attorney registration info, and is signed by Patricia Nicola, Chief Clerk.\" data-attachment-id=\"2201\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSuspensionOrder-01\/4139640563.png\" alt=\"A legal order from the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania suspending Stacy Parks Miller from the Bar for one year and one day, dated February 8, 2019.\" title=\"Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Order suspending Stacy Parks Miller from the Bar.\" width=\"640\" height=\"640\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Order suspending Stacy Parks Miller from the Bar.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">This is a scanned legal document titled 'ORDER' issued by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. It details that Stacy Parks Miller was suspended from the Bar for one year and one day, effective as of February 8, 2019, following recommendations from the Disciplinary Board. The document includes case numbers, attorney registration info, and is signed by Patricia Nicola, Chief Clerk.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSuspensionOrder-02.png\" data-caption-title=\"Disciplinary board report concerning attorney Stacy Parks Miller filed by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows a formal legal document from the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, dated February 23, 2017, detailing disciplinary proceedings against Stacy Parks Miller. It outlines two charges: ex parte communications with judges and use of a fictitious Facebook page.\" data-attachment-id=\"2202\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSuspensionOrder-02\/2390046812.png\" alt=\"A scanned legal document titled &#039;Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania&#039; regarding Stacy Parks Miller.\" title=\"Disciplinary board report concerning attorney Stacy Parks Miller filed by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel.\" width=\"640\" height=\"640\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Disciplinary board report concerning attorney Stacy Parks Miller filed by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows a formal legal document from the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, dated February 23, 2017, detailing disciplinary proceedings against Stacy Parks Miller. It outlines two charges: ex parte communications with judges and use of a fictitious Facebook page.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSuspensionOrder-03.png\" data-caption-title=\"Page of a legal document detailing motions, orders, and deadlines in a disciplinary case.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows a single page from a legal filing or court document with numbered paragraphs (ODC-A through ODC-I) describing procedural history involving a Respondent, Petitioner, Judge Krumenacker, and dates between March and May 2017. The text references motions for protective orders, disclosure requests, and deadlines to answer charges in a petition for discipline.\" data-attachment-id=\"2203\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSuspensionOrder-03\/283275270.png\" alt=\"A scanned legal document page showing text about a Respondent&#039;s motion for protective order and disciplinary proceedings.\" title=\"Page of a legal document detailing motions, orders, and deadlines in a disciplinary case.\" width=\"640\" height=\"640\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Page of a legal document detailing motions, orders, and deadlines in a disciplinary case.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows a single page from a legal filing or court document with numbered paragraphs (ODC-A through ODC-I) describing procedural history involving a Respondent, Petitioner, Judge Krumenacker, and dates between March and May 2017. The text references motions for protective orders, disclosure requests, and deadlines to answer charges in a petition for discipline.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSuspensionOrder-04.png\" data-caption-title=\"Page 3 of a legal filing outlining timeline of events in a discipline petition case.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows a single page (numbered 3) of a formal legal document, likely part of a court or board proceeding. It contains five paragraphs describing procedural actions taken between June and November 2017, including motions, orders, hearings, and an appeal to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. The text references parties as &#039;Petitioner&#039; and &#039;Respondent&#039;, and includes citations like ODC-K, ODC-N, etc.\" data-attachment-id=\"2204\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSuspensionOrder-04\/2145682690.png\" alt=\"A scanned page from a legal document detailing procedural history in a disciplinary case involving dates and motions.\" title=\"Page 3 of a legal filing outlining timeline of events in a discipline petition case.\" width=\"640\" height=\"640\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Page 3 of a legal filing outlining timeline of events in a discipline petition case.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows a single page (numbered 3) of a formal legal document, likely part of a court or board proceeding. It contains five paragraphs describing procedural actions taken between June and November 2017, including motions, orders, hearings, and an appeal to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. The text references parties as 'Petitioner' and 'Respondent', and includes citations like ODC-K, ODC-N, etc.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSuspensionOrder-05.png\" data-caption-title=\"Page 4 of a legal document describing a disciplinary hearing and subsequent report.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows a single page of text from a formal legal or administrative document. It details the procedural history of a disciplinary hearing held on April 23, 2018, before Chair Ludwikowski and two members. The text lists admitted exhibits for both the Petitioner and Respondent, notes filings made in June 2018 regarding suspension requests, and concludes with a report filed on August 21, 2018.\" data-attachment-id=\"2205\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSuspensionOrder-05\/3782462808.png\" alt=\"A scanned page from a legal document detailing disciplinary proceedings, including dates, committee members, and evidence lists.\" title=\"Page 4 of a legal document describing a disciplinary hearing and subsequent report.\" width=\"640\" height=\"640\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Page 4 of a legal document describing a disciplinary hearing and subsequent report.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows a single page of text from a formal legal or administrative document. It details the procedural history of a disciplinary hearing held on April 23, 2018, before Chair Ludwikowski and two members. The text lists admitted exhibits for both the Petitioner and Respondent, notes filings made in June 2018 regarding suspension requests, and concludes with a report filed on August 21, 2018.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSuspensionOrder-06.png\" data-caption-title=\"Page 5 of a legal document detailing exceptions to a committee report on Facebook-related charges.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows a printed legal document with text describing filings by the Petitioner and Respondent between September and October 2018. It includes dates, briefs filed, and a section titled &#039;FINDINGS OF FACT&#039; listing the Petitioner&#039;s address in Harrisburg.\" data-attachment-id=\"2206\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSuspensionOrder-06\/2579174391.png\" alt=\"A scanned legal document page showing procedural history and findings of fact regarding a suspension order.\" title=\"Page 5 of a legal document detailing exceptions to a committee report on Facebook-related charges.\" width=\"640\" height=\"640\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Page 5 of a legal document detailing exceptions to a committee report on Facebook-related charges.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows a printed legal document with text describing filings by the Petitioner and Respondent between September and October 2018. It includes dates, briefs filed, and a section titled 'FINDINGS OF FACT' listing the Petitioner's address in Harrisburg.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSuspensionOrder-07.png\" data-caption-title=\"Page of a legal document detailing the background and disciplinary context of Stacy Parks Miller.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows a single page from a formal legal document, likely part of a suspension or disciplinary order. It includes numbered paragraphs describing an individual&#039;s professional history, including admission to the bar in 1994, employment as Assistant District Attorney, and service as District Attorney of Centre County. The text references rules of disciplinary enforcement and joint stipulations.\" data-attachment-id=\"2207\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSuspensionOrder-07\/120347565.png\" alt=\"A scanned legal document page containing numbered paragraphs about a respondent named Stacy Parks Miller, her admission to the bar in Pennsylvania, and disciplinary proceedings.\" title=\"Page of a legal document detailing the background and disciplinary context of Stacy Parks Miller.\" width=\"640\" height=\"640\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Page of a legal document detailing the background and disciplinary context of Stacy Parks Miller.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows a single page from a formal legal document, likely part of a suspension or disciplinary order. It includes numbered paragraphs describing an individual's professional history, including admission to the bar in 1994, employment as Assistant District Attorney, and service as District Attorney of Centre County. The text references rules of disciplinary enforcement and joint stipulations.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSuspensionOrder-08.png\" data-caption-title=\"Page 7 of a legal document detailing disciplinary proceedings and communications related to Justin Cluck.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image displays a scanned page from a legal filing containing numbered paragraphs (7\u201312) that describe procedural actions such as filing petitions, missed deadlines, and email exchanges between a respondent and Judge Bradley Lunsford. The text references criminal prosecution, bail orders, and emergency communications dated February 1, 2013.\" data-attachment-id=\"2208\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSuspensionOrder-08\/1203173887.png\" alt=\"A scanned legal document page showing numbered paragraphs discussing a petition for discipline, ex parte matters, and email correspondence involving Judge Bradley Lunsford and Just\" title=\"Page 7 of a legal document detailing disciplinary proceedings and communications related to Justin Cluck.\" width=\"640\" height=\"640\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Page 7 of a legal document detailing disciplinary proceedings and communications related to Justin Cluck.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image displays a scanned page from a legal filing containing numbered paragraphs (7\u201312) that describe procedural actions such as filing petitions, missed deadlines, and email exchanges between a respondent and Judge Bradley Lunsford. The text references criminal prosecution, bail orders, and emergency communications dated February 1, 2013.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSuspensionOrder-09.png\" data-caption-title=\"Page from a legal brief detailing correspondence between the Respondent and Judge Lunsford regarding bail and order rescission.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image displays a scanned page of a legal document with numbered paragraphs (13\u201320) discussing ex parte communications between the Respondent and Judge Lunsford. It includes an excerpt from an email requesting rescission of an order, followed by responses and references to court filings such as Form DB-7A. A section titled &#039;The Horan Matter&#039; begins at paragraph 18.\" data-attachment-id=\"2209\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSuspensionOrder-09\/3642864037.png\" alt=\"A scanned legal document page showing numbered paragraphs discussing ex parte communications between a respondent and Judge Lunsford, including email excerpts and references to cou\" title=\"Page from a legal brief detailing correspondence between the Respondent and Judge Lunsford regarding bail and order rescission.\" width=\"640\" height=\"640\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Page from a legal brief detailing correspondence between the Respondent and Judge Lunsford regarding bail and order rescission.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image displays a scanned page of a legal document with numbered paragraphs (13\u201320) discussing ex parte communications between the Respondent and Judge Lunsford. It includes an excerpt from an email requesting rescission of an order, followed by responses and references to court filings such as Form DB-7A. A section titled 'The Horan Matter' begins at paragraph 18.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSuspensionOrder-10.png\" data-caption-title=\"Scanned legal document excerpt detailing correspondence and judicial decisions.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows a single page from a legal document with numbered paragraphs (21\u201333) describing email exchanges between parties and judges. It includes references to cases like Horan v. DA Stacy Parks Miller and Commonwealth v. Shirk, along with dates and court actions such as denial of writs.\" data-attachment-id=\"2210\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSuspensionOrder-10\/3809116427.png\" alt=\"A scanned legal document page showing numbered paragraphs discussing email communications, court rulings, and case citations.\" title=\"Scanned legal document excerpt detailing correspondence and judicial decisions.\" width=\"640\" height=\"640\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Scanned legal document excerpt detailing correspondence and judicial decisions.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows a single page from a legal document with numbered paragraphs (21\u201333) describing email exchanges between parties and judges. It includes references to cases like Horan v. DA Stacy Parks Miller and Commonwealth v. Shirk, along with dates and court actions such as denial of writs.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSuspensionOrder-11.png\" data-caption-title=\"Scanned legal document excerpt detailing trial proceedings and text message evidence.\" data-caption-desc=\"This is a scanned page from a legal document, likely an appendix or exhibit list (ODC-A), containing numbered paragraphs describing courtroom testimony regarding blood alcohol levels and subsequent text messages between the Respondent and Judge Grine. The text references specific dates in May 2014, forensic analysis of deleted messages, and quotes from six recovered messages related to a &#039;Shirk&#039; matter.\" data-attachment-id=\"2211\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSuspensionOrder-11\/2107492689.png\" alt=\"A scanned legal document page showing numbered paragraphs discussing a trial, blood alcohol evidence, text messages to Judge Grine, and the Shirk matter.\" title=\"Scanned legal document excerpt detailing trial proceedings and text message evidence.\" width=\"640\" height=\"640\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Scanned legal document excerpt detailing trial proceedings and text message evidence.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">This is a scanned page from a legal document, likely an appendix or exhibit list (ODC-A), containing numbered paragraphs describing courtroom testimony regarding blood alcohol levels and subsequent text messages between the Respondent and Judge Grine. The text references specific dates in May 2014, forensic analysis of deleted messages, and quotes from six recovered messages related to a 'Shirk' matter.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSuspensionOrder-12.png\" data-caption-title=\"Page 11 of a legal document detailing court proceedings and evidence.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows a printed legal document with numbered paragraphs referencing dates, judges, and case numbers. It includes excerpts from audio transcripts and mentions forensic analysis of text messages. The page ends with the number 11 at the bottom center.\" data-attachment-id=\"2212\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSuspensionOrder-12\/89462782.png\" alt=\"A scanned legal document page showing numbered paragraphs discussing court hearings, sentencing, and digital evidence recovery.\" title=\"Page 11 of a legal document detailing court proceedings and evidence.\" width=\"640\" height=\"640\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Page 11 of a legal document detailing court proceedings and evidence.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows a printed legal document with numbered paragraphs referencing dates, judges, and case numbers. It includes excerpts from audio transcripts and mentions forensic analysis of text messages. The page ends with the number 11 at the bottom center.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSuspensionOrder-13.png\" data-caption-title=\"Page 12 of a legal document excerpting correspondence and responses regarding text messaging with a judge.\" data-caption-desc=\"This is a scanned page (numbered 12) from a legal filing containing numbered paragraphs that reference text messages between a respondent and Judge Lunsford. It includes an excerpt from a &#039;verified response&#039; where the respondent acknowledges sending messages but denies using them to influence pending criminal matters or improperly communicate with the court.\" data-attachment-id=\"2213\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSuspensionOrder-13\/2613206948.png\" alt=\"A scanned legal document page showing numbered paragraphs discussing text messaging between a respondent and Judge Lunsford, including excerpts from a verified response.\" title=\"Page 12 of a legal document excerpting correspondence and responses regarding text messaging with a judge.\" width=\"640\" height=\"640\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Page 12 of a legal document excerpting correspondence and responses regarding text messaging with a judge.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">This is a scanned page (numbered 12) from a legal filing containing numbered paragraphs that reference text messages between a respondent and Judge Lunsford. It includes an excerpt from a 'verified response' where the respondent acknowledges sending messages but denies using them to influence pending criminal matters or improperly communicate with the court.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSuspensionOrder-14.png\" data-caption-title=\"Legal document excerpt regarding text message communications and a motion for recusal.\" data-caption-desc=\"This is a scanned page from a legal filing containing numbered paragraphs (49\u201353) discussing text messages sent to Judge Lunsford, the Respondent\u2019s response denying independent recollection of sending them, and a prior Motion for Recusal in Commonwealth v. McClure filed October 30, 2014.\" data-attachment-id=\"2214\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSuspensionOrder-14\/4106529440.png\" alt=\"A scanned legal document page showing numbered paragraphs discussing text messages to Judge Lunsford and the McClure Matter, with underlined emphasis on respondent&#039;s lack of recoll\" title=\"Legal document excerpt regarding text message communications and a motion for recusal.\" width=\"640\" height=\"640\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Legal document excerpt regarding text message communications and a motion for recusal.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">This is a scanned page from a legal filing containing numbered paragraphs (49\u201353) discussing text messages sent to Judge Lunsford, the Respondent\u2019s response denying independent recollection of sending them, and a prior Motion for Recusal in Commonwealth v. McClure filed October 30, 2014.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSuspensionOrder-15.png\" data-caption-title=\"Legal document excerpt regarding court statements on digital communications.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows a single page of a legal document with numbered paragraphs (54\u201360) containing quoted court statements and references to dates and forms. The text discusses allegations involving text messaging, email records, and responses from the Respondent and Petitioner in relation to Judge Lunsford.\" data-attachment-id=\"2215\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSuspensionOrder-15\/1783882490.png\" alt=\"A scanned page from a legal document showing numbered paragraphs discussing court statements about text messages and emails.\" title=\"Legal document excerpt regarding court statements on digital communications.\" width=\"640\" height=\"640\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Legal document excerpt regarding court statements on digital communications.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows a single page of a legal document with numbered paragraphs (54\u201360) containing quoted court statements and references to dates and forms. The text discusses allegations involving text messaging, email records, and responses from the Respondent and Petitioner in relation to Judge Lunsford.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSuspensionOrder-16.png\" data-caption-title=\"Page 15 of a legal document detailing court proceedings and responses regarding the McClure and Hoy matters.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows a printed legal document page containing numbered paragraphs (61\u201366) that reference specific forms, dates, and court hearings. It includes citations to external cases such as Commonwealth v. Hoy and mentions Judge Lunsford, Petitioner, and Respondent in the context of alleged false statements and motions to recuse.\" data-attachment-id=\"2216\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSuspensionOrder-16\/312163413.png\" alt=\"A scanned legal document page with numbered paragraphs discussing court hearings, petitions, and motions to recuse.\" title=\"Page 15 of a legal document detailing court proceedings and responses regarding the McClure and Hoy matters.\" width=\"640\" height=\"640\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Page 15 of a legal document detailing court proceedings and responses regarding the McClure and Hoy matters.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows a printed legal document page containing numbered paragraphs (61\u201366) that reference specific forms, dates, and court hearings. It includes citations to external cases such as Commonwealth v. Hoy and mentions Judge Lunsford, Petitioner, and Respondent in the context of alleged false statements and motions to recuse.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSuspensionOrder-17.png\" data-caption-title=\"Legal document excerpt detailing communications between parties and court proceedings.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows a scanned page of a legal brief or opinion with numbered paragraphs (67\u201374) referencing text message exchanges, court hearings, and formal filings. It includes citations such as ODC-A 104 and mentions dates like January 21, 2015. The text discusses whether communications were improper ex parte contacts and references cases like Horan and Best.\" data-attachment-id=\"2217\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSuspensionOrder-17\/2349626383.png\" alt=\"A page from a legal document showing numbered paragraphs discussing text messages, ex parte communications, and court hearings.\" title=\"Legal document excerpt detailing communications between parties and court proceedings.\" width=\"640\" height=\"640\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Legal document excerpt detailing communications between parties and court proceedings.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows a scanned page of a legal brief or opinion with numbered paragraphs (67\u201374) referencing text message exchanges, court hearings, and formal filings. It includes citations such as ODC-A 104 and mentions dates like January 21, 2015. The text discusses whether communications were improper ex parte contacts and references cases like Horan and Best.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSuspensionOrder-18.png\" data-caption-title=\"Document excerpt detailing admissions regarding improper communications with judges.\" data-caption-desc=\"This image shows a single page (numbered 17) from a formal legal document, likely a suspension order or disciplinary report. The text consists of numbered paragraphs (75-81) describing an individual&#039;s admitted violations of professional conduct rules through email and text messages to judges in various matters.\" data-attachment-id=\"2218\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSuspensionOrder-18\/3432437341.png\" alt=\"A scanned page from a legal document containing numbered paragraphs discussing ex parte communications and violations of professional conduct rules.\" title=\"Document excerpt detailing admissions regarding improper communications with judges.\" width=\"640\" height=\"640\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Document excerpt detailing admissions regarding improper communications with judges.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">This image shows a single page (numbered 17) from a formal legal document, likely a suspension order or disciplinary report. The text consists of numbered paragraphs (75-81) describing an individual's admitted violations of professional conduct rules through email and text messages to judges in various matters.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSuspensionOrder-19.png\" data-caption-title=\"Legal document excerpt detailing respondent&#039;s actions regarding Judge Grine and a fake Facebook page.\" data-caption-desc=\"This is a scanned page from a legal document, likely a court opinion or judgment, containing numbered paragraphs (82\u201387) that describe communications between the respondent and Judge Grine concerning a criminal prosecution. It also details how the respondent created a fictitious Facebook account named &#039;Britney Bella&#039; in May 2011 to monitor establishments selling illegal bath salts by liking their pages and accepting friend requests.\" data-attachment-id=\"2219\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSuspensionOrder-19\/1375837703.png\" alt=\"A scanned legal document page showing numbered paragraphs discussing communications with Judge Grine and the creation of a fictitious Facebook account for tracking bath salt sales.\" title=\"Legal document excerpt detailing respondent&#039;s actions regarding Judge Grine and a fake Facebook page.\" width=\"640\" height=\"640\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Legal document excerpt detailing respondent's actions regarding Judge Grine and a fake Facebook page.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">This is a scanned page from a legal document, likely a court opinion or judgment, containing numbered paragraphs (82\u201387) that describe communications between the respondent and Judge Grine concerning a criminal prosecution. It also details how the respondent created a fictitious Facebook account named 'Britney Bella' in May 2011 to monitor establishments selling illegal bath salts by liking their pages and accepting friend requests.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSuspensionOrder-20.png\" data-caption-title=\"Legal document excerpt detailing the creation and use of a fake Facebook account for investigative purposes.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image displays a single page from a legal filing or court document, featuring numbered paragraphs (88\u201394) that describe the establishment of a Facebook page under the name &#039;Britney Bella&#039; by a respondent. The text references communications with law enforcement, including an email dated May 17, 2011, and a Form DB-7 from January 21, 2015. It also notes the respondent\u2019s later denial of using such language in their verified answer dated February 27, 2015.\" data-attachment-id=\"2220\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSuspensionOrder-20\/2770073516.png\" alt=\"A scanned legal document page showing numbered paragraphs discussing a Facebook account named &#039;Britney Bella&#039;, email communications, and law enforcement concerns.\" title=\"Legal document excerpt detailing the creation and use of a fake Facebook account for investigative purposes.\" width=\"640\" height=\"640\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Legal document excerpt detailing the creation and use of a fake Facebook account for investigative purposes.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image displays a single page from a legal filing or court document, featuring numbered paragraphs (88\u201394) that describe the establishment of a Facebook page under the name 'Britney Bella' by a respondent. The text references communications with law enforcement, including an email dated May 17, 2011, and a Form DB-7 from January 21, 2015. It also notes the respondent\u2019s later denial of using such language in their verified answer dated February 27, 2015.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSuspensionOrder-21.png\" data-caption-title=\"Scanned legal document excerpt detailing criminal investigations and court proceedings.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows a single page of a legal document containing numbered paragraphs (95\u2013100) that reference Facebook accounts, store raids, and criminal cases involving Samuel Hill and Jalene McClure. The text cites case numbers such as Commonwealth v. Hill and mentions dates in 2012 related to charges, pleas, and sentencing.\" data-attachment-id=\"2221\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSuspensionOrder-21\/999079926.png\" alt=\"A scanned legal document page with numbered paragraphs discussing Facebook accounts, criminal matters, and court cases.\" title=\"Scanned legal document excerpt detailing criminal investigations and court proceedings.\" width=\"640\" height=\"640\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Scanned legal document excerpt detailing criminal investigations and court proceedings.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows a single page of a legal document containing numbered paragraphs (95\u2013100) that reference Facebook accounts, store raids, and criminal cases involving Samuel Hill and Jalene McClure. The text cites case numbers such as Commonwealth v. Hill and mentions dates in 2012 related to charges, pleas, and sentencing.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSuspensionOrder-22.png\" data-caption-title=\"Legal document excerpt detailing Ms. McClure\u2019s charges, Facebook interactions, and testimony on drug-related activities.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows a single page from a legal document containing numbered paragraphs (101\u2013106) that reference Ms. McClure\u2019s September 2012 criminal charges, November 2012 court transfer, and use of the \u2018Britney Bella\u2019 Facebook account to search for her and her sons. Paragraphs also include references to friend requests, verified answers from February 2015, and testimony about curbing a bath salts epidemic.\" data-attachment-id=\"2222\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSuspensionOrder-22\/1128554841.png\" alt=\"A scanned legal document page with numbered paragraphs discussing Ms. McClure&#039;s criminal case and Facebook activity.\" title=\"Legal document excerpt detailing Ms. McClure\u2019s charges, Facebook interactions, and testimony on drug-related activities.\" width=\"640\" height=\"640\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Legal document excerpt detailing Ms. McClure\u2019s charges, Facebook interactions, and testimony on drug-related activities.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows a single page from a legal document containing numbered paragraphs (101\u2013106) that reference Ms. McClure\u2019s September 2012 criminal charges, November 2012 court transfer, and use of the \u2018Britney Bella\u2019 Facebook account to search for her and her sons. Paragraphs also include references to friend requests, verified answers from February 2015, and testimony about curbing a bath salts epidemic.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSuspensionOrder-23.png\" data-caption-title=\"Page 22 of a legal document detailing miscellaneous findings from a disciplinary hearing.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows a printed legal document page with the heading &#039;Miscellaneous Findings&#039; and numbered paragraphs 107 through 113. The text discusses respondent remorse, misconduct acknowledgments, character witnesses, and testimony from Thomas R. Kline regarding professional conduct.\" data-attachment-id=\"2223\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSuspensionOrder-23\/3721603331.png\" alt=\"A scanned legal document page titled Miscellaneous Findings containing numbered paragraphs discussing disciplinary hearings and witness testimony.\" title=\"Page 22 of a legal document detailing miscellaneous findings from a disciplinary hearing.\" width=\"640\" height=\"640\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Page 22 of a legal document detailing miscellaneous findings from a disciplinary hearing.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows a printed legal document page with the heading 'Miscellaneous Findings' and numbered paragraphs 107 through 113. The text discusses respondent remorse, misconduct acknowledgments, character witnesses, and testimony from Thomas R. Kline regarding professional conduct.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSuspensionOrder-24.png\" data-caption-title=\"Legal document excerpts detailing witness accounts regarding the respondent&#039;s professional behavior.\" data-caption-desc=\"This is a single-page scan of a legal document, likely a court opinion or brief, containing numbered paragraphs from 114 to 123. The text discusses testimonies from individuals such as Kristin Ann Shirey and Jeffrey S. Helffrich Esquire regarding the respondent&#039;s character and disciplinary history.\" data-attachment-id=\"2224\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSuspensionOrder-24\/3000359943.png\" alt=\"A scanned legal document page showing numbered paragraphs describing witness testimonies about a respondent&#039;s character and conduct.\" title=\"Legal document excerpts detailing witness accounts regarding the respondent&#039;s professional behavior.\" width=\"640\" height=\"640\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Legal document excerpts detailing witness accounts regarding the respondent's professional behavior.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">This is a single-page scan of a legal document, likely a court opinion or brief, containing numbered paragraphs from 114 to 123. The text discusses testimonies from individuals such as Kristin Ann Shirey and Jeffrey S. Helffrich Esquire regarding the respondent's character and disciplinary history.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSuspensionOrder-25.png\" data-caption-title=\"Page from a suspension order detailing legal conclusions regarding professional conduct violations.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows a printed legal document with text referencing court testimony, rules of professional conduct, and specific rule citations. The visible section is titled &#039;CONCLUSIONS OF LAW&#039; and lists five numbered points under the heading &#039;The Ex parte Matters&#039;.\" data-attachment-id=\"2225\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSuspensionOrder-25\/742560861.png\" alt=\"A scanned legal document page showing numbered paragraphs and a section titled &#039;CONCLUSIONS OF LAW&#039; listing Rules of Professional Conduct violations.\" title=\"Page from a suspension order detailing legal conclusions regarding professional conduct violations.\" width=\"640\" height=\"640\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Page from a suspension order detailing legal conclusions regarding professional conduct violations.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows a printed legal document with text referencing court testimony, rules of professional conduct, and specific rule citations. The visible section is titled 'CONCLUSIONS OF LAW' and lists five numbered points under the heading 'The Ex parte Matters'.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSuspensionOrder-26.png\" data-caption-title=\"Page 25 of a suspension order discussing lawyer conduct rules.\" data-caption-desc=\"This is a scanned page from a legal document titled &#039;ParksMillerSuspensionOrder-26&#039;. It lists specific Rules of Professional Conduct (RPC) numbered 6, 1, 2, 3, and 4. The text mentions the &#039;Facebook Matter&#039; and discusses violations related to judicial conduct and unrepresented persons.\" data-attachment-id=\"2226\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSuspensionOrder-26\/1418349298.png\" alt=\"A scanned legal document page showing text about RPC rules, including references to Facebook Matter and professional misconduct.\" title=\"Page 25 of a suspension order discussing lawyer conduct rules.\" width=\"640\" height=\"640\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Page 25 of a suspension order discussing lawyer conduct rules.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">This is a scanned page from a legal document titled 'ParksMillerSuspensionOrder-26'. It lists specific Rules of Professional Conduct (RPC) numbered 6, 1, 2, 3, and 4. The text mentions the 'Facebook Matter' and discusses violations related to judicial conduct and unrepresented persons.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSuspensionOrder-27.png\" data-caption-title=\"Page excerpt from a suspension order detailing lawyer conduct rules and case background.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows a printed legal document, likely a court order or disciplinary report. It lists specific RPC violations including responsibility for others&#039; conduct, false statements, aiding violations, dishonesty, and prejudicial conduct. A discussion section begins below, mentioning a Petition for Discipline filed on February 23, 2017.\" data-attachment-id=\"2227\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSuspensionOrder-27\/3390898856.png\" alt=\"A scanned legal document page listing Rules of Professional Conduct (RPC) violations and a discussion section regarding disciplinary proceedings.\" title=\"Page excerpt from a suspension order detailing lawyer conduct rules and case background.\" width=\"640\" height=\"640\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Page excerpt from a suspension order detailing lawyer conduct rules and case background.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows a printed legal document, likely a court order or disciplinary report. It lists specific RPC violations including responsibility for others' conduct, false statements, aiding violations, dishonesty, and prejudicial conduct. A discussion section begins below, mentioning a Petition for Discipline filed on February 23, 2017.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSuspensionOrder-28.png\" data-caption-title=\"Page 27 of a disciplinary proceeding recommending one-year-one-day suspension for the Respondent.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows a printed legal document discussing ethical misconduct involving a fake Facebook page and improper email communications. It cites case law from Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. John Grigsby (1981) and references specific RPC violations including 4.3(a), 4.3(c), 5.4(b), 5.3(c)(1), 5.3(c)(2), 8.1(a), 8.4(a), 8.4(c), and 8.4(d). The text concludes with a recommendation for suspension based on clear and satisfactory evidence.\" data-attachment-id=\"2228\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSuspensionOrder-28\/2324144378.png\" alt=\"A scanned page from a legal disciplinary order containing text about ethical misconduct, Facebook usage, and suspension recommendations.\" title=\"Page 27 of a disciplinary proceeding recommending one-year-one-day suspension for the Respondent.\" width=\"640\" height=\"640\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Page 27 of a disciplinary proceeding recommending one-year-one-day suspension for the Respondent.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows a printed legal document discussing ethical misconduct involving a fake Facebook page and improper email communications. It cites case law from Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. John Grigsby (1981) and references specific RPC violations including 4.3(a), 4.3(c), 5.4(b), 5.3(c)(1), 5.3(c)(2), 8.1(a), 8.4(a), 8.4(c), and 8.4(d). The text concludes with a recommendation for suspension based on clear and satisfactory evidence.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSuspensionOrder-29.png\" data-caption-title=\"Page excerpt detailing violations of professional conduct rules involving ex parte communications.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows a printed page (numbered 28) from a legal document or court opinion. It contains four paragraphs describing how the Respondent engaged in improper text message and email communications with judges during various criminal proceedings, including references to cases named Cluck, Best, Shirk, Horan, and matters involving Judge Lunsford and Judge Grine.\" data-attachment-id=\"2229\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSuspensionOrder-29\/336652448.png\" alt=\"A scanned page from a legal document discussing improper communications with judges in criminal proceedings.\" title=\"Page excerpt detailing violations of professional conduct rules involving ex parte communications.\" width=\"640\" height=\"640\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Page excerpt detailing violations of professional conduct rules involving ex parte communications.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows a printed page (numbered 28) from a legal document or court opinion. It contains four paragraphs describing how the Respondent engaged in improper text message and email communications with judges during various criminal proceedings, including references to cases named Cluck, Best, Shirk, Horan, and matters involving Judge Lunsford and Judge Grine.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSuspensionOrder-30.png\" data-caption-title=\"Page 29 of a legal document detailing communications and social media activities.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows a single page from a legal document with three paragraphs describing false responses to inquiries, the creation of a fake Facebook page for law enforcement purposes, and lack of ethical guidance. The text references Judge Lunsford, Centre County, bath salts sales, and staff masquerading as &#039;Britney Bella&#039;. Page number 29 is visible at the bottom.\" data-attachment-id=\"2230\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSuspensionOrder-30\/775673870.png\" alt=\"A scanned page from a legal document discussing communications, false responses, Facebook activity, and law enforcement operations.\" title=\"Page 29 of a legal document detailing communications and social media activities.\" width=\"640\" height=\"640\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Page 29 of a legal document detailing communications and social media activities.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows a single page from a legal document with three paragraphs describing false responses to inquiries, the creation of a fake Facebook page for law enforcement purposes, and lack of ethical guidance. The text references Judge Lunsford, Centre County, bath salts sales, and staff masquerading as 'Britney Bella'. Page number 29 is visible at the bottom.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSuspensionOrder-31.png\" data-caption-title=\"Page 30 of a suspension order detailing committee conclusions on professional conduct violations.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows a printed page from a legal document, likely a court or disciplinary report. It discusses the Respondent&#039;s use of a Facebook account for ex parte communications and concludes with a three-month suspension recommendation. The text references specific rules (RPC 3.5(a), etc.) and mentions the Horan matter.\" data-attachment-id=\"2231\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSuspensionOrder-31\/2964099156.png\" alt=\"A scanned page from a legal document discussing committee findings on ex parte communications and Facebook usage violations.\" title=\"Page 30 of a suspension order detailing committee conclusions on professional conduct violations.\" width=\"640\" height=\"640\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Page 30 of a suspension order detailing committee conclusions on professional conduct violations.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows a printed page from a legal document, likely a court or disciplinary report. It discusses the Respondent's use of a Facebook account for ex parte communications and concludes with a three-month suspension recommendation. The text references specific rules (RPC 3.5(a), etc.) and mentions the Horan matter.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSuspensionOrder-32.png\" data-caption-title=\"Legal analysis of prosecutorial ethics regarding covert activity on social media.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows a printed page (numbered 31) from a formal legal opinion or order. It discusses whether prosecutors violate Rules of Professional Conduct by using fictitious Facebook pages and references case law like In re Pautler. Footnotes at the bottom provide additional context about suspension recommendations and jurisdictional exceptions.\" data-attachment-id=\"2232\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSuspensionOrder-32\/3362017019.png\" alt=\"A scanned page from a legal document discussing prosecutor conduct rules and social media use.\" title=\"Legal analysis of prosecutorial ethics regarding covert activity on social media.\" width=\"640\" height=\"640\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Legal analysis of prosecutorial ethics regarding covert activity on social media.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows a printed page (numbered 31) from a formal legal opinion or order. It discusses whether prosecutors violate Rules of Professional Conduct by using fictitious Facebook pages and references case law like In re Pautler. Footnotes at the bottom provide additional context about suspension recommendations and jurisdictional exceptions.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSuspensionOrder-33.png\" data-caption-title=\"Legal text excerpt detailing disciplinary actions against attorneys for deceptive investigative conduct.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows a single page of a legal document, likely part of a suspension order or case brief. It discusses the Ohio Supreme Court case Disciplinary Counsel v. Brockler and Pennsylvania ethics opinions regarding covert access to social media via fake personas. The text references Rules of Professional Conduct and describes how attorneys may be penalized for deceiving witnesses through fabricated online identities.\" data-attachment-id=\"2233\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSuspensionOrder-33\/1458767521.png\" alt=\"A scanned page from a legal document discussing attorney ethics cases involving covert social media investigation tactics.\" title=\"Legal text excerpt detailing disciplinary actions against attorneys for deceptive investigative conduct.\" width=\"640\" height=\"640\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Legal text excerpt detailing disciplinary actions against attorneys for deceptive investigative conduct.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows a single page of a legal document, likely part of a suspension order or case brief. It discusses the Ohio Supreme Court case Disciplinary Counsel v. Brockler and Pennsylvania ethics opinions regarding covert access to social media via fake personas. The text references Rules of Professional Conduct and describes how attorneys may be penalized for deceiving witnesses through fabricated online identities.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSuspensionOrder-34.png\" data-caption-title=\"Legal text describing unethical Facebook practices by the Respondent.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows a scanned page (page 33) of a legal opinion or suspension order. The visible text discusses how the Respondent created a fake Facebook page to appear legitimate, used pictures of an unrelated individual, and sent friend requests to individuals involved in criminal proceedings. It cites RPC 8.4(c) regarding fraudulent conduct and references Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. John Grigsby.\" data-attachment-id=\"2234\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSuspensionOrder-34\/972420005.png\" alt=\"A page from a legal document discussing Facebook operations by the District Attorney&#039;s office and ethical violations.\" title=\"Legal text describing unethical Facebook practices by the Respondent.\" width=\"640\" height=\"640\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Legal text describing unethical Facebook practices by the Respondent.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows a scanned page (page 33) of a legal opinion or suspension order. The visible text discusses how the Respondent created a fake Facebook page to appear legitimate, used pictures of an unrelated individual, and sent friend requests to individuals involved in criminal proceedings. It cites RPC 8.4(c) regarding fraudulent conduct and references Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. John Grigsby.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSuspensionOrder-35.png\" data-caption-title=\"Page 34 of a legal decision regarding disciplinary suspension and procedural objections.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows a printed page from a formal legal document, likely a court or board order. It contains text addressing exceptions raised by a &#039;Respondent&#039; concerning admission of evidence, counsel withdrawal, and grand jury investigation findings. The footer displays the page number 34.\" data-attachment-id=\"2235\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSuspensionOrder-35\/2808265727.png\" alt=\"A page from a legal document discussing disciplinary proceedings, mentioning RPC rules, respondent exceptions, and committee findings.\" title=\"Page 34 of a legal decision regarding disciplinary suspension and procedural objections.\" width=\"640\" height=\"640\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Page 34 of a legal decision regarding disciplinary suspension and procedural objections.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows a printed page from a formal legal document, likely a court or board order. It contains text addressing exceptions raised by a 'Respondent' concerning admission of evidence, counsel withdrawal, and grand jury investigation findings. The footer displays the page number 34.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSuspensionOrder-36.png\" data-caption-title=\"Page 35 of a legal opinion regarding disciplinary actions and suspension retroactivity.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows a printed page from a legal document, likely part of an appellate court opinion or brief. It discusses findings by a Committee regarding misconduct, cites case law on witness credibility, and addresses a respondent\u2019s request for retroactive suspension effective January 1, 2018. The text references the Pennsylvania Rules of Disciplinary Enforcement.\" data-attachment-id=\"2236\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSuspensionOrder-36\/3752486224.png\" alt=\"A scanned page from a legal document discussing disciplinary proceedings, mentioning the Horan matter and retroactive suspension.\" title=\"Page 35 of a legal opinion regarding disciplinary actions and suspension retroactivity.\" width=\"640\" height=\"640\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Page 35 of a legal opinion regarding disciplinary actions and suspension retroactivity.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows a printed page from a legal document, likely part of an appellate court opinion or brief. It discusses findings by a Committee regarding misconduct, cites case law on witness credibility, and addresses a respondent\u2019s request for retroactive suspension effective January 1, 2018. The text references the Pennsylvania Rules of Disciplinary Enforcement.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSuspensionOrder-37.png\" data-caption-title=\"Page 36 of a legal opinion addressing disciplinary proceedings.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows a printed page (numbered 36) from a legal decision or order. The text discusses the retroactivity of suspensions, arguments regarding the admissibility of exhibits like newspaper articles and docket entries, and cites cases such as Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Jeff Foreman. A footnote at the bottom references the weight given to newspaper articles by the Committee.\" data-attachment-id=\"2237\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSuspensionOrder-37\/1094528266.png\" alt=\"A scanned page from a legal document discussing suspension retroactivity, evidence admissibility, and professional misconduct.\" title=\"Page 36 of a legal opinion addressing disciplinary proceedings.\" width=\"640\" height=\"640\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Page 36 of a legal opinion addressing disciplinary proceedings.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows a printed page (numbered 36) from a legal decision or order. The text discusses the retroactivity of suspensions, arguments regarding the admissibility of exhibits like newspaper articles and docket entries, and cites cases such as Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Jeff Foreman. A footnote at the bottom references the weight given to newspaper articles by the Committee.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSuspensionOrder-38.png\" data-caption-title=\"Page 37 of a disciplinary order discussing attorney misconduct.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows a printed page (numbered 37) from a legal document, likely a suspension or disciplinary order. The text discusses general considerations for imposing discipline, cites several Pennsylvania cases (e.g., Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Robert Lucarini), and identifies aggravating factors such as the respondent serving as District Attorney of Centre County at the time of misconduct.\" data-attachment-id=\"2238\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSuspensionOrder-38\/27758424.png\" alt=\"A scanned page from a legal document discussing lawyer discipline in Pennsylvania, citing case law and describing aggravating factors of misconduct.\" title=\"Page 37 of a disciplinary order discussing attorney misconduct.\" width=\"640\" height=\"640\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Page 37 of a disciplinary order discussing attorney misconduct.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows a printed page (numbered 37) from a legal document, likely a suspension or disciplinary order. The text discusses general considerations for imposing discipline, cites several Pennsylvania cases (e.g., Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Robert Lucarini), and identifies aggravating factors such as the respondent serving as District Attorney of Centre County at the time of misconduct.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSuspensionOrder-39.png\" data-caption-title=\"Legal text analyzing the respondent&#039;s role as District Attorney in assessing discipline.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows a scanned page of a legal opinion or brief discussing attorney misconduct. It cites cases like Cappuccio and Preski regarding public trust and mentions the respondent\u2019s position as an aggravating factor. The text references ex parte communication and remorse issues.\" data-attachment-id=\"2239\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSuspensionOrder-39\/2670774018.png\" alt=\"A page from a legal document discussing attorney misconduct, public trust, and disciplinary assessment.\" title=\"Legal text analyzing the respondent&#039;s role as District Attorney in assessing discipline.\" width=\"640\" height=\"640\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Legal text analyzing the respondent's role as District Attorney in assessing discipline.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows a scanned page of a legal opinion or brief discussing attorney misconduct. It cites cases like Cappuccio and Preski regarding public trust and mentions the respondent\u2019s position as an aggravating factor. The text references ex parte communication and remorse issues.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSuspensionOrder-40.png\" data-caption-title=\"Page 39 of a suspension order detailing witness testimony and comparative case law.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows a single page (numbered 39) from a formal legal document, likely a disciplinary suspension order. The text discusses mitigation evidence presented by the respondent, including testimony from five witnesses regarding their representation of victims and competency as litigators. It also references prior Pennsylvania disciplinary cases, specifically citing Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Ronald James Gross.\" data-attachment-id=\"2240\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSuspensionOrder-40\/691608290.png\" alt=\"A scanned page from a legal document discussing respondent&#039;s character evidence and prior disciplinary cases in Pennsylvania.\" title=\"Page 39 of a suspension order detailing witness testimony and comparative case law.\" width=\"640\" height=\"640\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Page 39 of a suspension order detailing witness testimony and comparative case law.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows a single page (numbered 39) from a formal legal document, likely a disciplinary suspension order. The text discusses mitigation evidence presented by the respondent, including testimony from five witnesses regarding their representation of victims and competency as litigators. It also references prior Pennsylvania disciplinary cases, specifically citing Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Ronald James Gross.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSuspensionOrder-41.png\" data-caption-title=\"Page 40 of a legal review detailing disciplinary actions against prosecutors for criminal conduct.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows a printed page (numbered 40) from a legal document or report. It discusses the Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Gary Scott Silver and mentions prior cases involving prosecutors like Cappuccio and Pazuhanich, citing case numbers and dates. The text is in standard serif font on white paper.\" data-attachment-id=\"2241\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSuspensionOrder-41\/3081654968.png\" alt=\"A scanned page from a legal document discussing disciplinary cases against prosecutors, including Gary Scott Silver and Mark Peter Pazuhanich.\" title=\"Page 40 of a legal review detailing disciplinary actions against prosecutors for criminal conduct.\" width=\"640\" height=\"640\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Page 40 of a legal review detailing disciplinary actions against prosecutors for criminal conduct.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows a printed page (numbered 40) from a legal document or report. It discusses the Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Gary Scott Silver and mentions prior cases involving prosecutors like Cappuccio and Pazuhanich, citing case numbers and dates. The text is in standard serif font on white paper.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSuspensionOrder-42.png\" data-caption-title=\"Page 41 of a suspension order detailing attorney misconduct cases.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows a printed page (numbered 41) from a legal document, likely a court order or disciplinary report. It contains two paragraphs describing the conduct of attorneys Pazuhanich and Carbone, including their roles, specific violations, and resulting sanctions such as disbarment or suspension.\" data-attachment-id=\"2242\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSuspensionOrder-42\/3479604247.png\" alt=\"A scanned page from a legal document discussing disciplinary actions against attorneys Pazuhanich and Carbone.\" title=\"Page 41 of a suspension order detailing attorney misconduct cases.\" width=\"640\" height=\"640\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Page 41 of a suspension order detailing attorney misconduct cases.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows a printed page (numbered 41) from a legal document, likely a court order or disciplinary report. It contains two paragraphs describing the conduct of attorneys Pazuhanich and Carbone, including their roles, specific violations, and resulting sanctions such as disbarment or suspension.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSuspensionOrder-43.png\" data-caption-title=\"Page excerpt detailing attorney misconduct cases and suspension orders.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows a printed page (numbered 42) from a legal opinion or court order. It discusses disciplinary matters involving John T. Olshock and Charles J. Allano, citing specific case numbers and dates. The text mentions professional conduct violations but does not depict any physical objects like oversized bank checks.\" data-attachment-id=\"2243\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSuspensionOrder-43\/1374798925.png\" alt=\"A scanned page from a legal document discussing disciplinary actions against attorneys, including references to Olshock and Allano cases.\" title=\"Page excerpt detailing attorney misconduct cases and suspension orders.\" width=\"640\" height=\"640\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Page excerpt detailing attorney misconduct cases and suspension orders.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows a printed page (numbered 42) from a legal opinion or court order. It discusses disciplinary matters involving John T. Olshock and Charles J. Allano, citing specific case numbers and dates. The text mentions professional conduct violations but does not depict any physical objects like oversized bank checks.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSuspensionOrder-44.png\" data-caption-title=\"Page 43 of a suspension order detailing misconduct involving ex parte communications and a fictitious Facebook page.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows a single page of text from a formal legal document, likely a court order or disciplinary decision. The visible content describes serious misconduct by the Respondent, including improper communications with judges and use of a fake social media page, resulting in a one-year-one-day suspension.\" data-attachment-id=\"2244\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSuspensionOrder-44\/1056387401.png\" alt=\"A scanned page from a legal document discussing misconduct and suspension order.\" title=\"Page 43 of a suspension order detailing misconduct involving ex parte communications and a fictitious Facebook page.\" width=\"640\" height=\"640\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Page 43 of a suspension order detailing misconduct involving ex parte communications and a fictitious Facebook page.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows a single page of text from a formal legal document, likely a court order or disciplinary decision. The visible content describes serious misconduct by the Respondent, including improper communications with judges and use of a fake social media page, resulting in a one-year-one-day suspension.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSuspensionOrder-45.png\" data-caption-title=\"Recommendation section of a disciplinary order recommending suspension for Stacy Parks Miller.\" data-caption-desc=\"This is a scanned page (numbered 45) from a formal legal document titled &#039;RECOMMENDATION&#039; by the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. It recommends suspending Respondent Stacy Parks Miller for one year and one day, with expenses to be paid by her. The document includes a signature line signed by Dion G. Rassias, Member, dated 12.6.18, and notes that three members were recused.\" data-attachment-id=\"2245\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/ParksMillerSuspensionOrder-45\/2690677011.png\" alt=\"A scanned page from a legal document showing the recommendation section of a disciplinary board decision against Stacy Parks Miller, including signatures and date.\" title=\"Recommendation section of a disciplinary order recommending suspension for Stacy Parks Miller.\" width=\"640\" height=\"640\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Recommendation section of a disciplinary order recommending suspension for Stacy Parks Miller.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">This is a scanned page (numbered 45) from a formal legal document titled 'RECOMMENDATION' by the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. It recommends suspending Respondent Stacy Parks Miller for one year and one day, with expenses to be paid by her. The document includes a signature line signed by Dion G. Rassias, Member, dated 12.6.18, and notes that three members were recused.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div>\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<div class=\"fiv-ctrls\">\n\t\t\t<button type=\"button\" class=\"fiv-prev\" title=\"Prev\"><span>Prev<\/span><\/button>\n\t\t\t<label class=\"fiv-count\"><span class=\"fiv-count-current\">1<\/span>of<span class=\"fiv-count-total\">58<\/span><\/label>\n\t\t\t<button type=\"button\" class=\"fiv-next\" title=\"Next\"><span>Next<\/span><\/button>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n<p>After the county voted Parks Miller out, the Disciplinary Board finally <a href=\"https:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20210702181618\/https:\/\/theappeal.org\/pstacy-parks-miller-faces-discipline-9b792f43833\/\">took action<\/a> against her <a href=\"https:\/\/www.yahoo.com\/now\/process-procedure-prosecutorial-misconduct-stacy-013221555.html\">eight years<\/a> after the first documented misconduct report. I have included the order suspending her law license below. The suspension was for one year, after which she could apply for reinstatement. I believe the committee denied her first application, and she is still not allowed to practice law. That&#8217;s not stopped her from plastering Tinder and Bumble with trashy photos; see below. In the misconduct report, you can read about all the other misconduct Parks Miller committed in the 13-page committee recommendation and 45-page order contained in the image gallery. In particular, as noted by the Disciplinary Board, the role of a prosecutor is to serve the public and seek justice, not convictions or victim advocacy, and that &#8220;She&#8217;s harmed the public perception of the judiciary and the level of trust in the criminal justice system.&#8221; I wonder how many district attorneys see their role as truth and justice seekers and not punishers; I suspect few.<\/p><p><!--nextpage--><\/p><audio class=\"wp-audio-shortcode\" id=\"audio-353-3\" preload=\"none\" style=\"width: 100%;\" controls=\"controls\"><source type=\"audio\/mpeg\" src=\"https:\/\/unstablefocus.mynetgear.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/Intermission-353-P03.mp3?_=3\" \/><a href=\"https:\/\/unstablefocus.mynetgear.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/Intermission-353-P03.mp3\">https:\/\/unstablefocus.mynetgear.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/Intermission-353-P03.mp3<\/a><\/audio>\r\n<div id=\"attachment_354\" style=\"width: 167px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-354\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-354\" src=\"https:\/\/unstablefocus.mynetgear.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/Kane-157x300.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"157\" height=\"300\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/Kane-157x300.jpg 157w, https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/Kane-535x1024.jpg 535w, https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/Kane.jpg 751w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 157px) 100vw, 157px\" \/><p id=\"caption-attachment-354\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Kathleen Kane entering the courtroom as a defendant.<\/p><\/div>\r\n<p>It is unclear why the board waited until she was out of the office to discipline her or if they would have done so had she been re-elected. I suspect they didn&#8217;t want to interfere with the will of the county&#8217;s people who elected her to represent them. However, I think it was clear long before her term ran out that the people of Centre County were not happy with her actions. The Disciplinary Board did not seem to have a problem <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2015\/09\/22\/us\/kathleen-kane-pennsylvania-attorney-general-is-suspended-from-practicing-law.html\">revoking<\/a> the law license of Pennsylvania&#8217;s Attorney General, Kathleen Kane, mid-term.<\/p>\r\n<div style=\"display: flex; float: left; width: 400px; padding-right: 10pt;\">\r\n<style type=\"text\/css\">\n#foogallery-gallery-2178 .fg-image { width: 360px; }<\/style>\n\t\t\t<div class=\"foogallery foogallery-container foogallery-image-viewer foogallery-link-image foogallery-lightbox-foobox fg-center fg-image-viewer fg-ready fg-dark fg-border-thin fg-shadow-outline fg-loading-default fg-loaded-fade-in fg-caption-hover fg-hover-fade fg-hover-zoom fg-no-js\" id=\"foogallery-gallery-2178\" data-foogallery=\"{&quot;item&quot;:{&quot;showCaptionTitle&quot;:true,&quot;showCaptionDescription&quot;:true},&quot;lazy&quot;:true,&quot;src&quot;:&quot;src&quot;,&quot;srcset&quot;:&quot;srcset&quot;,&quot;template&quot;:{&quot;loop&quot;:true,&quot;autoplay&quot;:0}}\" style=\"--fg-title-line-clamp: 0; --fg-description-line-clamp: 0;\" >\n\t<div class=\"fiv-inner\">\n\t\t<div class=\"fiv-inner-container\">\n\t\t\t<div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/IMG_4079.png\" data-caption-title=\"A Bumble profile screenshot featuring two photos of a person.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image is a screenshot of the Bumble mobile app interface displaying a user&#039;s profile. The top photo shows a pair of feet in black shoes on a wooden floor, while the bottom photo is a close-up selfie of a blonde woman with makeup and a black jacket. No text or documents are clearly visible.\" data-attachment-id=\"1984\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/IMG_4079\/564840324.png\" alt=\"Screenshot of the Bumble app showing a profile with two photos: one of feet in black shoes on wood flooring, and one of a blonde woman wearing makeup and a black jacket.\" title=\"A Bumble profile screenshot featuring two photos of a person.\" width=\"360\" height=\"360\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">A Bumble profile screenshot featuring two photos of a person.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image is a screenshot of the Bumble mobile app interface displaying a user's profile. The top photo shows a pair of feet in black shoes on a wooden floor, while the bottom photo is a close-up selfie of a blonde woman with makeup and a black jacket. No text or documents are clearly visible.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/IMG_4080.png\" data-caption-title=\"A selfie-style photo from the Bumble app featuring a woman with wavy blonde hair.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image is a screenshot of the Bumble mobile application displaying a profile photo. The central subject is a woman with long, wavy blonde hair, wearing a black top and a necklace; she is looking directly at the camera. The background includes a bedroom setting with a bed and wooden flooring.\" data-attachment-id=\"1983\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/IMG_4080\/3935309668.png\" alt=\"Screenshot of Bumble app showing a woman with blonde hair in a black top, part of her face and upper body visible.\" title=\"A selfie-style photo from the Bumble app featuring a woman with wavy blonde hair.\" width=\"360\" height=\"360\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">A selfie-style photo from the Bumble app featuring a woman with wavy blonde hair.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image is a screenshot of the Bumble mobile application displaying a profile photo. The central subject is a woman with long, wavy blonde hair, wearing a black top and a necklace; she is looking directly at the camera. The background includes a bedroom setting with a bed and wooden flooring.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/IMG_4081.png\" data-caption-title=\"Selfie of a woman in a black sports bra indoors.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image is a screenshot from the Bumble app showing a selfie of a woman with long blonde hair, blue eyes, and light makeup. She is wearing a black sports bra with white floral embroidery on the side and a thin gold necklace with a small pendant. The background includes a dark flat-screen TV on a white cabinet with wooden paneling behind it.\" data-attachment-id=\"1982\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/IMG_4081\/1625188159.png\" alt=\"A woman with blonde hair wearing a black sports bra taking a selfie in a room with a TV and wooden furniture.\" title=\"Selfie of a woman in a black sports bra indoors.\" width=\"360\" height=\"360\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Selfie of a woman in a black sports bra indoors.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image is a screenshot from the Bumble app showing a selfie of a woman with long blonde hair, blue eyes, and light makeup. She is wearing a black sports bra with white floral embroidery on the side and a thin gold necklace with a small pendant. The background includes a dark flat-screen TV on a white cabinet with wooden paneling behind it.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/IMG_4082.png\" data-caption-title=\"A Bumble profile featuring photos of a woman in casual and sporty outfits.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image is a screenshot of the Bumble dating app interface displaying three vertical photos. The top photo shows a close-up of a person wearing a red sports bra over purple leggings. The middle photo features a smiling blonde woman in sunglasses, black tank top, and blue jeans holding a blue cup near wooden bird cages. The bottom photo is a close-up selfie of her face with blue eyes.\" data-attachment-id=\"1981\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/IMG_4082\/629004691.png\" alt=\"Screenshot of Bumble app showing three photos of a blonde woman in athletic wear, sunglasses, and jeans near bird cages.\" title=\"A Bumble profile featuring photos of a woman in casual and sporty outfits.\" width=\"360\" height=\"360\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">A Bumble profile featuring photos of a woman in casual and sporty outfits.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image is a screenshot of the Bumble dating app interface displaying three vertical photos. The top photo shows a close-up of a person wearing a red sports bra over purple leggings. The middle photo features a smiling blonde woman in sunglasses, black tank top, and blue jeans holding a blue cup near wooden bird cages. The bottom photo is a close-up selfie of her face with blue eyes.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/IMG_4083.png\" data-caption-title=\"Woman in red bikini top on Bumble profile photo.\" data-caption-desc=\"Screenshot of a Bumble dating app profile showing a woman with long blonde hair wearing a red patterned bikini top. The interface displays filters for height, activity status, education level, and social preferences. A second photo at the bottom shows her wearing sunglasses in front of a fence.\" data-attachment-id=\"1980\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/IMG_4083\/2939400648.png\" alt=\"A woman with blonde hair wearing a red bikini top, smiling at the camera on a Bumble dating app interface.\" title=\"Woman in red bikini top on Bumble profile photo.\" width=\"360\" height=\"360\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Woman in red bikini top on Bumble profile photo.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">Screenshot of a Bumble dating app profile showing a woman with long blonde hair wearing a red patterned bikini top. The interface displays filters for height, activity status, education level, and social preferences. A second photo at the bottom shows her wearing sunglasses in front of a fence.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/IMG_4084.png\" data-caption-title=\"Profile photo of Poppy, 51, on Bumble.\" data-caption-desc=\"This is a screenshot of the Bumble dating app showing a profile for &#039;Poppy, 51&#039;. The image features a woman with long blonde hair wearing a camouflage tank top and holding a green glass jar. The background shows an outdoor setting with palm trees and a building. There are no visible oversized bank checks or related objects in the image.\" data-attachment-id=\"1979\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/IMG_4084\/1934172709.png\" alt=\"A woman with long blonde hair wearing a camouflage tank top, holding a green glass jar, displayed on the Bumble app interface.\" title=\"Profile photo of Poppy, 51, on Bumble.\" width=\"360\" height=\"360\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Profile photo of Poppy, 51, on Bumble.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">This is a screenshot of the Bumble dating app showing a profile for 'Poppy, 51'. The image features a woman with long blonde hair wearing a camouflage tank top and holding a green glass jar. The background shows an outdoor setting with palm trees and a building. There are no visible oversized bank checks or related objects in the image.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/IMG_4085.png\" data-caption-title=\"Bumble profile page for user named Poppy, 51.\" data-caption-desc=\"A mobile screenshot of the Bumble dating app displaying a profile for &#039;Poppy, 51&#039;. The visible text includes height (5&#039; 5&quot;), activity status (Active), education (Graduate degree), social preference (Socially), and relationship goal (Never). A partial second photo is shown at the bottom.\" data-attachment-id=\"1978\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/IMG_4085\/4178004606.png\" alt=\"Screenshot of Bumble dating app profile for Poppy, 51, showing photo and bio details.\" title=\"Bumble profile page for user named Poppy, 51.\" width=\"360\" height=\"360\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Bumble profile page for user named Poppy, 51.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">A mobile screenshot of the Bumble dating app displaying a profile for 'Poppy, 51'. The visible text includes height (5' 5\"), activity status (Active), education (Graduate degree), social preference (Socially), and relationship goal (Never). A partial second photo is shown at the bottom.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/IMG_4388.png\" data-caption-title=\"Dating app profile showing a woman named Poppy, 51 years old.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image is a screenshot of a mobile dating application interface displaying a user profile. The visible text includes the name &#039;Poppy&#039;, age &#039;51&#039;, and location indicator &#039;3 miles away&#039;. A small information icon is present in the bottom right corner of the profile card.\" data-attachment-id=\"1977\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/IMG_4388\/3628708957.png\" alt=\"A woman with blonde hair wearing a black top and necklace in a dating app profile view\" title=\"Dating app profile showing a woman named Poppy, 51 years old.\" width=\"360\" height=\"360\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Dating app profile showing a woman named Poppy, 51 years old.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image is a screenshot of a mobile dating application interface displaying a user profile. The visible text includes the name 'Poppy', age '51', and location indicator '3 miles away'. A small information icon is present in the bottom right corner of the profile card.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/IMG_4389.png\" data-caption-title=\"A casual indoor selfie featuring a woman and a small white cat.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows a close-up of a woman with long blonde hair wearing a black top and a delicate necklace. In the background, there is a small white cat walking on a wooden floor near some household items. The scene appears to be taken indoors in a home setting.\" data-attachment-id=\"1976\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/IMG_4389\/1376246790.png\" alt=\"A woman with blonde hair wearing a black top, smiling at the camera, with a small white cat walking nearby in a room.\" title=\"A casual indoor selfie featuring a woman and a small white cat.\" width=\"360\" height=\"360\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">A casual indoor selfie featuring a woman and a small white cat.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows a close-up of a woman with long blonde hair wearing a black top and a delicate necklace. In the background, there is a small white cat walking on a wooden floor near some household items. The scene appears to be taken indoors in a home setting.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/IMG_4390.png\" data-caption-title=\"Woman posing in a car while Dua Lipa\u2019s song plays.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows a screenshot of a social media interface featuring a woman with blonde braided hair wearing aviator sunglasses and a black crop top. She is seated in the driver&#039;s seat of a vehicle, with her hand raised near her head. A music player overlay displays &#039;Don&#039;t Start Now&#039; by Dua Lipa.\" data-attachment-id=\"1975\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/IMG_4390\/2434755105.png\" alt=\"A woman with blonde hair in a braid wearing sunglasses and a black top, sitting inside a vehicle with music playing.\" title=\"Woman posing in a car while Dua Lipa\u2019s song plays.\" width=\"360\" height=\"360\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Woman posing in a car while Dua Lipa\u2019s song plays.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows a screenshot of a social media interface featuring a woman with blonde braided hair wearing aviator sunglasses and a black crop top. She is seated in the driver's seat of a vehicle, with her hand raised near her head. A music player overlay displays 'Don't Start Now' by Dua Lipa.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/IMG_4391.png\" data-caption-title=\"A casual photo of a woman posing indoors with music playing.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows a screenshot of a social media interface featuring a woman seated on a dark leather couch. She is wearing a black strappy top and red pants, looking directly at the camera. A Spotify widget displays Dua Lipa&#039;s song &#039;Don&#039;t Start Now&#039; in the lower left corner.\" data-attachment-id=\"1974\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/IMG_4391\/458293882.png\" alt=\"A woman with blonde hair wearing a black top and red pants sitting on a couch in a living room setting.\" title=\"A casual photo of a woman posing indoors with music playing.\" width=\"360\" height=\"360\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">A casual photo of a woman posing indoors with music playing.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows a screenshot of a social media interface featuring a woman seated on a dark leather couch. She is wearing a black strappy top and red pants, looking directly at the camera. A Spotify widget displays Dua Lipa's song 'Don't Start Now' in the lower left corner.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/IMG_4393.png\" data-caption-title=\"Profile card showing Poppy, age 51, with a music track displayed over an outdoor photo.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image is a screenshot of a mobile app profile page featuring a woman named Poppy, aged 51. She has long blonde hair and is holding a green glass jar containing ice and liquid. An overlay displays her name, age, and a Spotify song titled &#039;Don&#039;t Start Now&#039; by Dua Lipa.\" data-attachment-id=\"1972\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/IMG_4393\/341602776.png\" alt=\"A woman with long blonde hair holding a green glass jar outdoors; interface overlay shows name &#039;Poppy&#039;, age &#039;51&#039;, and music track info.\" title=\"Profile card showing Poppy, age 51, with a music track displayed over an outdoor photo.\" width=\"360\" height=\"360\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">Profile card showing Poppy, age 51, with a music track displayed over an outdoor photo.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image is a screenshot of a mobile app profile page featuring a woman named Poppy, aged 51. She has long blonde hair and is holding a green glass jar containing ice and liquid. An overlay displays her name, age, and a Spotify song titled 'Don't Start Now' by Dua Lipa.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fg-item fg-type-image fg-loading\"><figure class=\"fg-item-inner\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/IMG_4394.png\" data-caption-title=\"A social media-style photo featuring a woman in athletic wear with overlay text.\" data-caption-desc=\"The image shows a close-up of a woman with blonde hair wearing a grey textured sports bra. Overlaid on the bottom left is white text reading &#039;Poppy 51&#039;, and below that, album art for Dua Lipa\u2019s song &#039;Don&#039;t Start Now&#039; appears alongside Spotify branding. The interface resembles a mobile app screen with icons at top and bottom.\" data-attachment-id=\"1971\" data-type=\"image\" class=\"fg-thumb\"><span class=\"fg-image-wrap\"><img src=\"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/cache\/2021\/10\/IMG_4394\/3585458574.png\" alt=\"A woman with blonde hair wearing a grey sports bra, overlaid with text &#039;Poppy 51&#039; and music info for Dua Lipa&#039;s song &#039;Don&#039;t Start Now&#039;.\" title=\"A social media-style photo featuring a woman in athletic wear with overlay text.\" width=\"360\" height=\"360\" class=\"skip-lazy fg-image\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/span><span class=\"fg-image-overlay\"><\/span><\/a><figcaption class=\"fg-caption\"><div class=\"fg-caption-inner\"><div class=\"fg-caption-title\">A social media-style photo featuring a woman in athletic wear with overlay text.<\/div><div class=\"fg-caption-desc\">The image shows a close-up of a woman with blonde hair wearing a grey textured sports bra. Overlaid on the bottom left is white text reading 'Poppy 51', and below that, album art for Dua Lipa\u2019s song 'Don't Start Now' appears alongside Spotify branding. The interface resembles a mobile app screen with icons at top and bottom.<\/div><\/div><\/figcaption><\/figure><div class=\"fg-loader\"><\/div><\/div>\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<div class=\"fiv-ctrls\">\n\t\t\t<button type=\"button\" class=\"fiv-prev\" title=\"Prev\"><span>Prev<\/span><\/button>\n\t\t\t<label class=\"fiv-count\"><span class=\"fiv-count-current\">1<\/span>of<span class=\"fiv-count-total\">13<\/span><\/label>\n\t\t\t<button type=\"button\" class=\"fiv-next\" title=\"Next\"><span>Next<\/span><\/button>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n<p>Another issue that became clear, and I would assume is an issue in all small-town legal systems, is that the attorneys are very much indebted to the judges, especially the defense attorneys. Small counties only have a few judges; in Centre County, there are four. Thus, attorneys are constantly in front of the same judge. The attorneys seem hesitant to in any way annoy a judge because there might be repercussions on other cases and even their careers. When attorneys do not have to be afraid of these repercussions, they can more vigorously defend their clients.<\/p>\r\n<p>In a small legal system where everyone knows everyone, social relationships become part of the system. You have read and will read much more about <i>&#8220;ex parte<\/i>&#8221; communications in the coming chapters. Recall, these are communications between lawyers and judges in which only one party participates. It seems like they are commonplace in Centre County as people are constantly running into one another. Sometimes these communications are harmless, and sometimes they are even helpful. However, there is a reason they are not supposed to happen.<\/p><p><!--nextpage--><\/p><audio class=\"wp-audio-shortcode\" id=\"audio-353-4\" preload=\"none\" style=\"width: 100%;\" controls=\"controls\"><source type=\"audio\/mpeg\" src=\"https:\/\/unstablefocus.mynetgear.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/Intermission-353-P04.mp3?_=4\" \/><a href=\"https:\/\/unstablefocus.mynetgear.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/Intermission-353-P04.mp3\">https:\/\/unstablefocus.mynetgear.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/Intermission-353-P04.mp3<\/a><\/audio>I have, at this point, had interactions with the legal systems of Centre County, Pennsylvania, and Monroe County, Michigan, which both have populations of roughly 150,000; although when you include Penn State University students, the population of Centre County grows to nearly 200,000. Thus, I feel comparing the legal systems in the counties is fair. Much of the difference comes from how the two states organize their courts.<\/p>\r\n<p>Monroe County has the 1st District Court, which &#8220;[has] exclusive jurisdiction of all civil litigation up to $25,000 and handles garnishments, eviction proceedings, land contract and mortgage foreclosures, and other proceedings&#8230;[and]&#8230;handles all misdemeanors where punishment does not exceed one year, including arraignment, setting and acceptance of bail, trial, and sentencing, and conducts preliminary examinations in felony cases.&#8221; These lower courts are similar to Pennsylvania&#8217;s Magisterial District Courts, in which judges handle most of these things, besides all but the most minor of misdemeanors. In Michigan, all judges have to have practiced law for at least five years, but in Pennsylvania, laws do not require district magistrates to have law degrees, although most do. Centre County has six district magistrates, while Monroe County has three district court judges.<\/p>\r\n<p>The 38th Circuit Court &#8220;has original jurisdiction in all civil cases involving more than $25,000 and in all criminal cases where the offense is a felony or certain serious misdemeanors&#8221; and hears appeals from the District Court. The 38th Circuit also includes the Domestic Relations Section, which handles custody cases. The 38th Circuit Court has five judges, two of which handle juvenile cases in the Probate Court, and one handles domestic relations cases. The Circuit Courts in Michigan are equivalent to the Common Pleas Courts in Pennsylvania. The Common Pleas Court in Centre County has four judges. Thus, Centre County has two more judges than Monroe County, but one fewer judge to handle more severe and domestic cases. Additionally, Monroe County appears to assign specific types of cases to particular judges. There are, of course, pros and cons to this, but I believe the Michigan system is superior.<\/p>\r\n<p>Part of the Michigan Circuit Courts is called The Friend of the Court (FOC), and from what I can tell, it consists of a group of mediators that help resolve disputes before they ever get to a courtroom. According to Monroe County&#8217;s website, &#8220;The main function of the Friend of the Court is to enforce the court orders issued by the Circuit Court for Child Support, Custody, and Parenting Time.&#8221; It lists only one member, but there are many more.<\/p>\r\n<p>When you have a hearing involving child support, custody, or parenting time, you first meet with the FOC. Both parties and attorneys meet with the FOC to determine if the responding party objects to the moving party&#8217;s request. If they do, then the FOC tries to negotiate a compromise. With no objections, the FOC writes a new order, and the judge signs it. If the parties cannot settle, they go into a courtroom and speak with a judge. Frequently this is just a minor issue, and the FOC briefs the judge on the dispute. The judge asks some questions and makes a ruling. The FOC then writes a new order for the judge to sign. Often, they make handwritten adjustments to the preliminary order the FOC had already written.<\/p>\r\n<p>This system seems better in many ways than the Pennsylvania system, which has nothing like the FOC. I&#8217;m not sure how many states have a system like Michigan&#8217;s FOC, but they <i>all<\/i> should. It is such a better and more efficient way of getting things done. Meetings with the FOC do get contentious at times, but the state appears to have trained FOCs to handle this, and with experience, they know how to suggest compromises. As I was trying to increase parenting time after the move, I filed many petitions. The FOC negotiated a settlement to Rita&#8217;s objections most of the time, and we never even saw the judge. We usually spent less than 10 minutes in the courtroom when we couldn&#8217;t settle on a solution. However, I&#8217;m sure plenty of Michigan residents may feel differently about the FOC, and I have not always agreed with their decisions.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I now have two small-town (county) legal systems to compare. However, I am more familiar with the Centre County (PA) legal system than the Monroe County (MI) legal system. My experiences with the Monroe County system have been much better than my experiences with the Centre County system. While things seem to be turning around [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"_oasis_is_in_workflow":0,"_oasis_original":0,"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-353","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/353","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=353"}],"version-history":[{"count":40,"href":"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/353\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3065,"href":"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/353\/revisions\/3065"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.unstablefocus.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=353"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}